Audit in one location and continue in another location
Answer:
If your question is about that a part of the audit is performed in one location, and the audit can continue on another location in couple of days, yes, it can be possible, there is no problem from my point of view, and it can be established in the audit plan. It is valid not only for internal audits, but for certification audits as well.
Answer:
From my point of view, if your company is complex, in your case can be a recommendation to limit the scope of the ISMS. I mean, the implementation of the ISMS in your company could be gradual, so maybe the first year you can implement the ISMS in a sector of the organization, next year you can implement the ISMS in another sector, and so on. Although, generally, our recommendation is , if the company is small, that the scope is for the entire organization (but I think that your case is different).
Answer:
The first thing, and the more important thing, is to obtain the management support. Other important things are to treat the implementation as a project, define the scope, etc. Here you can find an article with a checklist with 16 steps to implement in order, establishing top priorities (from the most critically important to the less significant issues), the ISO 27001 in your organization “ISO 27001 implementation checklist” : https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/iso-27001-implementation-checklist/
By the way, in our free download section, you can find a template for a Project plan for ISO 27001 / ISO 22301 implementation (MS Word), a Diagram of ISO 27001:2013 Implementation (PDF) (you can use it to create a flow chart), a Project checklist for ISO 2 7001 implementation (MS Word), so I recommend you to visit our section here : https://advisera.com/27001academy/free-downloads/
Finally, our online course can be also very interesting for you because we give detailed information about the implementation process of ISO 27001 in your organization “ISO 27001:2013 Foundations Course” : https://advisera.com/training/iso-27001-foundations-course/
More information about the SOA
Answer:
I am sorry but I am not sure what you mean. Anyway, the SOA is an important document –and a mandatory document- in the implementation of the ISO 27001. This document simply includes the 114 controls of the Annex A of ISO 27001:2013, establishing the applicability of each control (and the justification of each applicability). If you need more information about the SOA, this article can be interesting for you “The importance of Statement of Applicability for ISO 27001” : https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/the-importance-of-statement-of-applicability-for-iso-27001/
Finally, our online course can be also interesting for you because we also give more information about the identification of interested parties “ISO 27001:2013 Foundations Course” : https://advisera.com/training/iso-27001-foundations-course/
Specific requirements about the qualifications of an internal auditor?
Answer:
There is no specific requirements about the qualifications of an internal auditor, but ISO 27001 requires from the organization to select auditors to perform the internal audit. And generally, companies want - and need - auditors with experience and knowledge about ISO 27001.
If the person is ISO 27001:2013 certified, I mean, is a Lead Auditor accredited by a company, it can be very good, but it is not mandatory, although you need to demonstrate your experience and knowledge, and for this a course can be a good option. For more information about the qualifications about an internal auditor, this article can be interesting for you “Qualifications for an ISO 27001 Internal Auditor” : https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2015/03/30/qualifications-for-an-iso-27001-internal-auditor/
No - there is no best practice because each company needs to determine their acceptable level of risk based on the methodology, based on the industry they are in, based on the management intention, etc. This article may help you: Why is residual risk so important? https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/why-is-residual-risk-so-important/
However, I noticed some inconsistencies in your calculation of risk: asset value is basically the same thing as the impact, so you calculate the same value twice in your risk which is unnecessary; further, you calculate both likelihood and vulnerability, however vulnerability is (together with the threat) part of calculating the likelihood - again you have duplication.
What if supplier refuses to apply security measures?
Answer: This depends on your reaction - if you initiated certain corrective actions, for example: warning letter to the supplier, applying some penalties, searching for a new supplier, etc. then the certification auditor will see that you manage the situation. If you stay passive, then you will have a problem with the certification.
Initiating failover to the secondary site
Answer:
I'm not sure if I understood your question correctly, but your RTO has to be calculated in such a way to provide maximum time of disruption that you can sustain for particular system, process, or part of the company. Therefore, the moment that you get disrupted (i.e. the moment when the incident strikes), the clock for your RTO starts ticking.
The point is - you have to be very careful if you calculate very short RTO like 30 minutes - what will be the cost to prepare to be able to achieve such short recovery time? Maybe it would be better to accept higher risk and decrease the costs.
That is probably a mistake because the project plan was in the folder 00 in previous version of the toolkit so we probably delivered you previous version of "How to start using the toolkit info". Thank you for the feedback