Please select user.Assign
There are no topics yet.
I want to set an industry standard for anilox volume measurement , We have developed a fully automated , closed loop process that is secure and accurate i think ISO 17025 would be the correct accreditation
Is it mandatory to write a specific procedure for impartiality?
There is a debate about the recalibration date, we perform our plan on monthly basis & the auditor insists to be done by day, so the calibration validity ends by the cal. month 1st.date. which method is more accurate?
I come from a cGMP background so DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ is standard for all equipment, but now I'm trying to set up an ISO 17025 compliant lab and am not sure if I need to do the same qualification. Would calibration and verification to make sure the equipment is functioning (using a lab developed reference standard, if CRM is not available) suffice?
Can you help me to found more reference about Measurment uncentrity .?
What are the best methods and procedure on handling samples according to International best practices. Example waste water (effluent) and potable water)?
Hope you are doing well,
Actually, I need your help to find the accurate and the most clear difference between validation and verification on the laboratory.
I really appreciate your answer.
Thank you for your time.
How to properly implement section 7.2 and 7.6 for a microbiological lab?
Please explain further sub-clause 6.4.2 for our reference.
Hi, I am revising my Quality Management Plan to include risk. How specific should certain risks be detailed in the QMP?