must I finish the project that implements the controls selected for getting ISO
The implementation of controls must be planned through the Risk Treatment Plan - yes, you can plan to implement some of the controls after the certification audit, however you must make sure that you implement all the major controls before the certification audit.
This means that you can implement after the certification audit only the less important controls (those that decrease less significant risks); in such case the management must accept those risks because at the time of the certification those risks will be unacceptable.
Information Security Objectives and management support
Cesar,
Clause 5.2 of ISO 27001 requires you to include the things you mentioned in the top-level Information Security Policy:
- the management commitment to information security, and
- specify the information security objectives, or provide a framework for setting objectives (in this case, the objectives are documented separately)
Difference between Risk Treatment Plan and Risk Assessment Report
Risk Assessment Report simply reports the results of the risk assessment and risk treatment - therefore, it is reporting something from the past. On the other hand, the Risk Treatment Plan defines who will implement each control, with which resources, what are the deadlines, etc. - therefore, it is planning something for the future.
Control A.10.8.5 "Business Information Systems" existed in the old 2005 revision of ISO 27001 / ISO 27002, it does not exist any more in the 2013 revision of ISO 27001/27002.
All the requirements for transfer of information are now covered in the section A.13.2 called "Information transfer". To cover these requirements, you should prepare a policy which defines basic rules for exchanging the information with third parties, and then sign agreements with them which are compliant with your policy.
However, if you want to implement those standards separately, you can very easily separate the templates as well:
1) For implementation of any of the standards you need to use folders 0, 1, 2, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12
2) For implementation of ISO 27001 only, you need to use folders 3, 4, 6, 7 and 08 Annex A (A.6 to A.16)
3) For implementation of ISO 22301 only, you need to use folders 08 Annex A - A.17
Also I am wondering why the total templates is now 63 for the combo (ISO 22701 + 22301) while if I buy individuall y the ISO 27001 documentation templates would have been 43 and ISO 22301 templates are 33 making total of 76.
Answer: This is because some of the documents are the same for both standards - e.g. Procedure for Document and Record Control, Procedure for Internal Audit, etc.
ISO 27001 - must you implement all the 133 controls?
We do not use risk risk assessment tools because we are focused mainly on smaller and mid-sized companies - for such companies I think it is easier to use Excel sheets because it makes risk assessment much quicker; of course, larger companies will find it easier to perform risk analysis using some tool, but currently we cannot recommend any.
The 27000:2013 refers to preventive actions as an action aimed at getting rid of a potential noncompliance. But no trace of preventive in 27001:2013. But in my opinion, there is no such thing as a potential noncompliance.
Or you detect it and then it is a detected noncompliance requiring a corrective action. Or you do not detect it and then it has no existence.
Answer: It is true that in ISO 27001:2013 there are no requirements for preventive actions, however preventive actions are in fact included in risk assessment and treatment because the essence of risk management is to recognize a potential problem before it happens, and by treating it to prevent such an incident from happening.
There are examples of potential noncompliance - e.g. if the top management is not investing enough in training and awareness, the nonconformit ies will not happen right away, they will happen in the future. Therefore, in this case the preventive action would be to invest more in training and awareness.
Clause to requires status of control in 27001:2013 SOA
Chattavut,
ISO 27001:2013 defines Statement of Applicability in clause 6.1.3 d), and it requires that SoA should state for each control "whether they are implemented or not" - therefore, you need to document their status in SoA.
Does the scope exclusions allow in 27001:2013
Chattavut,
ISO 27001:2013 allows the scope of the ISMS to defined per the company decision - there are no restrictions whatsoever to which part of the company your ISMS is implemented. However, ISO 27001:2013 says that you need to implement all the clauses of the standard from 4 to 10 - you cannot exclude any of these clauses from the implementation.