Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
First of all, we're sorry about this misunderstanding.
In the context of ISO 27001, "analysis" means the assessment of consequences and likelihood to define how big a risk is, and there is no need to perform any additional analysis. The Methodology document in your toolkit explains the criteria for assessing consequences and likelihood, and the Excel sheet enables you to do it quickly by selecting the values and the risks are calculated automatically.
For further information, see:
- ISO 27001/ISO 27005 risk assessment & treatment – 6 basic steps https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/iso-27001-risk-assessment-treatment-6-basic-steps/
- How to assess consequences and likelihood in ISO 27001 risk analysis https://advisera.com/27001academy/iso-27001-risk-assessment-treatment-management/#assessment
Roughly speaking, ISO 27001 implementation steps can be resumed in:
This article will provide you a further explanation about ISMS implementation:
ISO 27001 implementation checklist https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/iso-27001-implementation-checklist/
To see how documents compliant with ISO 27001 looks like, please take a look at the free demo of our ISO 27001 Documentation Toolkit: https://advisera.com/27001academy/iso-27001-documentation-toolkit/
These materials will also help you regarding the ISO 27001 implementation:
Book Secure & Simple: A Small-Business Guide to Implementing ISO 27001 On Your Own https://advisera.com/books/secure-and-simple-a-small-business-guide-to-implementing-iso-27001-on-your-own/
Free online training ISO 27001 Foundations Course https://advisera.com/training/iso-27001-foundations-course/
Regarding the selection of a consultant, the process needs to consider their experience & skills, reputation, and customized service.
For more information, please read this article:
- 5 criteria for choosing an ISO 22301 / ISO 27001 consultant https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2013/03/25/5-criteria-for-choosing-a-iso-22301-iso-27001-consultant/
The duration from starting implementation to achieving accreditation depends on the size of the scope of work to be accredited and the resources available for the project. Typically it can take from 12 to 24 months. The process involves adopting and implementing all the mandatory activities and documenting the mandatory procedures to meet the requirements of ISO 17025. Then it involves actively recording evidence using forms and having records available before applying for accreditation.
For more information on ISO 17025 see What is ISO 17025?at https://advisera.com/17025academy/what-is-iso-17025/ and the Free webinar – What are the steps in the ISO 17025 accreditation process? at https://advisera.com/17025academy/webinar/what-are-the-steps-in-the-iso-17025-accreditation-process-free-webinar/
It is better to avoid any conflict of interest, but if you work in a small company, and you are the only person that has the knowledge to act as a Data Processor Officer (DPO), your company may take some organizational measures to avoid any conflict of interest (i.e., implementing authorization process for some decision that may conflict with your role as DPO).
Here you can find some information about the DPO role:
No, la base giuridica del trattamento nelle banche dati pubbliche è da rinvenirsi nella legge e nell'interesse pubblico. Il diritto di cancellazione, di cui all'articolo 17 GDPR, consente all'interessato di ottenere la cancellazione dei propri dati in alcune circostanze e a condizione che non si applichino le eccezioni. Tra le eccezioni, l'art. 17 paragrafo 3 lett. b) GDPR include l'interesse pubblico ed è il motivo per cui non è possibile ottenere la cancellazione.
Se vuoi sapere di più sui diritti dell'interessato, qui puoi trovare un articolo:
Se invece vuoi saperne di più su come implementare il GDPR, puoi iscriverti al corso EU GDPR Foundations Course: https://advisera.com/training/eu-gdpr-foundations-course/
In your second paragraph, I’m assuming you are referring to control A.8.3.2, instead of A.8.2.3.
Considering that, please note that these controls have different coverages:
You can think of control A.11.2.7 as a specific application of control A.8.3.2, although these controls can be applied independently of each other.
For further information, see:
First, design and development are not something only applicable to products. It is also applicable to services.
You wrote “sale of electronic products and provides technical assistance services”. I think that the answer to your question
“I would like to know if the procedure for design and development can be applied in my company?”
Depends on how your organization writes the scope of the management system. If the scope is closed, it lists all the technical assistance services provided under the management system, all services are already designed and developed. Any new services provided will not be included under the scope. In that case, design and development are not applicable. However, if your scope is open, if it is more generic, to be applicable to new services to be designed and developed in the future, then design and development are applicable.
For more information about exclusion, the right ISO wording is applicability, consider the following:
To meet ISO 17025 requirements, the testing laboratory must label, code or identify in some way that allows the user of the equipment to identify the calibration status or period of validity. As long as this is very clear to the user, there is no mandatory need to have a sticker placed by the third party calibration laboratory. The relevant documention (calibration certifcate) must also be available to the user.
For more information see What does ISO 17025:2017 require for laboratory measurement equipment and related procedures? at https://advisera.com/17025academy/blog/2019/07/25/iso-17025-measurement-requirements-of-the-standard/
There are differences in requirements for ISO 17025 accreditation and GMP certification. It is outside of the scope of the ISO 17025 Academy to comment on regulatory requirements, for example that of Health Canada. I suggest you contact the regulatory body.
For more information on ISO 17025, have a look at What is ISO 17025 at
https://advisera.com/17025academy/what-is-iso-17025/
Multi-site or group certifications are possible for management systems, although they are not common across continents. The real determination is the applicability of the QMS rules and polices across the different locations, if this is too different then a multi-site certification can be difficult. The certification comes down to the scope identified for the QMS, and this scope can include one location or several, but as stated if the multiple locations are very different from each other in processes, products or services this can be difficult. Additionally, legal requirements may be different across locations on different continents.
It is also important to note that not all certification bodies will be willing to do a certification like this. To certify multiple locations, you will need all locations audited and this may not be possible or accepted for all certification bodies.
You can read a bit more on scope of the QMS in these articles from the 9001Academy which are applicable: How to define the scope of the QMS according to ISO 9001:2015, https://advisera.com/9001academy/blog/2015/10/13/how-to-define-the-scope-of-the-qms-according-to-iso-90012015/ and Certifying different legal entities under one certification scope in ISO 9001, https://advisera.com/9001academy/blog/2018/03/27/certifying-different-legal-entities-under-one-certification-scope-in-iso-9001/