Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
If you investigate Annex A.3 from ISO 9001:2015 you can read in its last paragraph:
“It is for the organization to decide if a particular requirement of a relevant interested party is relevant to its quality management system.”
So, determining the needs and expectations of a particular interested party is not an exercise to be done in the abstract. It must be grounded on each organization’s reality and its purpose and strategic direction. Two similar organizations on the outside, due to different strategic orientations may hope to work and satisfy different segments within a generic group of interested parties.
Some examples can be:
Investors
Regulators
Your list is very long, and I cannot provide detailed information here. Remember, ISO 9001:2015 uses the word determine, not the word identify. Identify means that they exist independently of the observer, and the observer's work is to find them. Determine means that the observer, considering strategic orientation and context, decides what is relevant. It is a management decision, not a technical decision.
Please, check this free webinar on-demand - ISO 9001:2015 clause 4 - Context of the organization, interested parties, and scope - https://advisera.com/9001academy/webinar/iso-90012015-clause-4-context-of-the-organization-interested-parties-and-scope-free-webinar/ - where you can see examples of context and interested parties analysis.
You can find more information below:
I gather you are referring to an ISO 17025 internal Audit?
In that case, the person performing the audit needs to know what the Scope of work is (what tests or calibrations are accredited, is sampling included etc) and what processes are involved. Thereafter the audit criteria (the requirements being assessed) need to be documented. The simplest way to achieve this is to use a suitable checklist. This could be your own checklist based on the ISO 17025, however the most straightforward approach is to use the accreditation bodies checklist (which they use for their assessments) or the Advisera toolkit. Witnessing and vertical assessment should also be performed.
For further information see the article ISO 17025 technical internal audit: The basics
at https://advisera.com/17025academy/blog/2020/11/10/iso-17025-technical-internal-audit-the-basics/
The following will provide more information:
ISO 17025 document template: Internal Audit Procedure at https://advisera.com/17025academy/documentation/internal-audit-procedure/
The Five Internal Audit Procedure appendices Internal Audit Program, Internal Audit Checklist, Audit Nonconformity Report, Internal Audit Process Checklist and Internal Audit Report available separately from the procedure link above; or included in the toolkit at https://advisera.com/17025academy/iso-17025-documentation-toolkit/
1 - Do I list each requirement separately or put all 30 of the items in the "Description of the requirement" field?
The way of handling this situation will depend on who will be responsible for fulfilling the requirements. If a single role will be responsible for all requirements, then you can include a single register. In case the specific requirements are to be treated by different roles (e.g., there are privacy requirements, continuity requirements, compliance, requirements, etc.), that it is better to split the requirements into different records.
To not make the description excessively long, you can only identify a clause instead of including all of its text.
2 - Do I limit the items to just those that are security related ?
For ISO 27001 compliance purposes you only need to include the requirements related to information security.
3 - Most of our customers are banks , and we fill out a SIG that has 100's of security related questions, it seems impractical to list all of these in the register for each customer.
Suggestions?
In cases like this one you only need to refer to the customer Standardized Information Gathering (SIG). You do not need to include in the platform each question, only the reference to the document that contains them so that the person responsible for fulfilling them can know where to find them.
1 - How do I get this going in my company?
The first thing you need to do is identify which gaps of incompetence you have (i.e., which knowledge, or skills your employees need to have). Some examples are:
Second, you need to define the method to be applied: training sessions, workshops, newsletters? What will work best for your company? On which frequency to perform them (e.g., weekly, monthly, annually?)
After that, you need to evaluate if these gaps can be fulfilled by internal personnel, or you will need external support.
Once you have these answers, you can start defining your training and awareness plan.
These articles will provide you a further explanation about awareness:
This material will also help you regarding awareness:
2 - What will the auditor be looking for in this requirement?
For clause 7.2 (competence), the auditor will be looking for evidence that you have:
For further information, see:
Please note that “documents regarding risk treatment” can mean documents related to ISO 27001 clauses 6.1.3 and 8.3), and documents related to ISO 27001 Annex A.
Documents related to clauses 6.1.3 and 8.3 cannot be ignored because they are mandatory documentation. You need to develop them to be compliant with the standard. You need to document the results of risk treatment, even if you already have implemented controls. Documents required by these clauses are:
- Risk treatment plan (clauses 6.1.3 e, 6.2, and 8.3)
- Risk assessment report (clauses 8.2 and 8.3)
Regarding ISO 27001 Annex A, some controls, when defined as applicable, also require documents to be written:
- Definition of security roles and responsibilities (clauses A.7.1.2 and A.13.2.4)
- Inventory of assets (clause A.8.1.1)
- Acceptable use of assets (clause A.8.1.3)
- Access control policy (clause A.9.1.1)
- Operating procedures for IT management (clause A.12.1.1)
- Secure system engineering principles (clause A.14.2.5)
- Supplier security policy (clause A.15.1.1)
- Incident management procedure (clause A.16.1.5)
- Business continuity procedures (clause A.17.1.2)
- Statutory, regulatory, and contractual requirements (clause A.18.1.1)
In case you have implemented any of the abovementioned controls you need to develop related documents. For other controls no documentation is defined as mandatory, and you do not need to develop documents for them.
This article will provide you a further explanation about risk management and mandatory documents:
- ISO 27001/ISO 27005 risk assessment & treatment – 6 basic steps https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/iso-27001-risk-assessment-treatment-6-basic-steps/
- List of mandatory documents required by ISO 27001 (2013 revision) https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/list-of-mandatory-documents-required-by-iso-27001-2013-revision/
These materials will also help you regarding risk management:
- The basics of risk assessment and treatment according to ISO 27001 [free webinar on demand] https://advisera.com/27001academy/webinar/basics-risk-assessment-treatment-according-iso-27001-free-webinar-demand/
- Book ISO 27001 Risk Management in Plain English https://advisera.com/books/iso-27001-risk-management-in-plain-english/
All surgically invasive instruments can be classified according to Rule 6 and Rule 7 of Annex 8 – Classification rules in the MDR 2017/745. But, before answering your question, I have to state that according to Advisera's policy, we are not authorized to define the classification of medical devices. Therefore, I ask you to consider this answer only as a guideline.
Reusable surgical instruments are classified in a new class according to the MDR – class Ir.Rationale: Rule 6
All surgically invasive devices intended for transient use are classified as class IIa unless they:
- are reusable surgical instruments, in which case they are classified as Class I.
A drill bit or reamer attached to a power drill and jig used in knee surgery is class IIa:
Rationale: Rule 6 - All surgically invasive devices intended for transient use are classified as class IIa unless they...
or
Rule 7 - All surgically invasive devices intended for short-term use are classified as class IIa unless they...
Under which rule drill bit or reamer will go depends on how long it is used during the operation - if it is below 60 minutes then Rule 6 is valid, and if it is longer than 60 minutes then rule 7 is valid.
Retractors, Gouges, forceps are all reusable surgical instruments and goes under the same classification path as any other reusable surgical instruments – so class Ir.
For more information, see:
I’m assuming you meant to say “Identification of applicable legislation and contractual requirements” for control A.18.1.1 ( “Inventory of assets” is the control A.8.1.1, and it is not directly related to clause 4.2 - Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties).
To see a document that can fulfill control A.18.1.1, please take a look at this free demo: https://advisera.com/27001academy/documentation/list-of-legal-regulatory-contractual-and-other-requirements/
These articles will provide you a further explanation about the identification of legal requirements:
- How to identify interested parties according to ISO 27001 and ISO 22301 https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/how-to-identify-interested-parties-according-to-iso-27001-and-iso-22301/
- How to identify ISMS requirements of interested parties in ISO 27001 https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2017/02/06/how-to-identify-isms-requirements-of-interested-parties-in-iso-27001/
ISO 19011 is the standard used for auditing ISO management systems, including ISO 27001. You can find this standard here: https://www.iso.org/standard/70017.html
For certification audits the ISO 27006 needs to be taken into account. This standard specifies requirements and provides guidance for bodies providing audit and certification of an information security management system (ISMS).
For further information, see:
- How to perform an internal audit using ISO 19011 (PDF) https://info.advisera.com/free-download/how-to-perform-an-internal-audit-using-iso-19011
These materials will also help you regarding audits:
- ISO Internal Audit: A Plain English Guide https://advisera.com/books/iso-internal-audit-plain-english-guide/
- ISO 27001:2013 Internal Auditor Course https://advisera.com/training/iso-27001-internal-auditor-course/
The term Key Performance Indicator refers to measurements you used to determine the performance and effectiveness of the QMS. This is completely up to you, but the main question you need to ask yourself is "What do I need to measure to know that my QMS processes are performing as expected and that they are effective?". KPIs also depend on what is a company’s strategy and competitive advantage.
For example, the following questions can be asked for defining the KPI for production:How long does it take to produce a product? When you define that time (e.g. 2 hours), then your KPI is to produce by that time or less. If you want the production time to be shorter (eg 1.5 hours), then it is necessary to analyze which step can be shortened without affecting the final quality of the productHow much waste is during production? The KPI is that you want the waste to be around 2% for example.
For more information regarding the KPI, please see the following article, regardless of what is their mention of the ISO 9001 standard:
The main differences are:
These articles will provide you a further explanation about ISO 27001 and ISO 27002:
These materials will also help you regarding ISO 27001 and ISO 27002: