Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
... Please note that for Business Impact Analysis you do not need to take into account risks, only the impact of the disruption over the processes. Risk identification (so you can identify the ones with the most chance to occur) can be performed either before or after BIA, but it is a completely different and independent process.
For further information, see:
You need to confirm this information with your certification body, but if the ISO 27017 ISO 27018 controls were audited during your ISO 27001 certification audit this information can be included in your customer certificate.
These articles can provide further information:
... ISO 27001 vs. ISO 27002 https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/iso-27001-vs-iso-27002/
This material can also provide additional information:
- ISO 27001 Annex A Controls in Plain English https://advisera.com/books/iso-27001-annex-controls-plain-english/
... sk owners vs. asset owners in ISO 27001:2013 https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/risk-owners-vs-asset-owners-in-iso-270012013/
These materials will also help you regarding risk management:
... te>
Answer: Please note that breaking down the internal audit into sections is valid only after the certification audit (i.e., for surveillance audits). For the certification audit, you need to have performed an internal audit over all the ISMS scope.
This article will provide you a further explanation about certification and surveillance audits:
- Surveillance visits vs. certification audits https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/surveillance-visits-vs-certification-audits/
... c: EU MDR vs. MDD – What has changed? https://advisera.com/13485academy/blog/2020/11/24/infographic-eu-mdr-vs-mdd-what-has-changed/
For more information, see:
To help you in the preparation of the technical documentation, please read the following article:
... ISO 27001 vs. ISO 27017 – Information security controls for cloud services https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2015/11/30/iso-27001-vs-iso-27017-information-security-controls-for-cloud-services/
- ISO 27001 vs. ISO 27018 – Standard for protecting privacy in the cloud https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2015/11/16/iso-27001-vs-iso-27018-standard-for-protecting-privacy-in-the-cloud/
... ssessment vs. business impact analysis https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/risk-assessment-vs-business-impact-analysis/
- How to implement business impact analysis (BIA) according to ISO 22301 https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/how-to-implement-business-impact-analysis-bia-according-to-iso-22301/
2 - Also as per you answer, should I perform RA only for the process which I have in BIA? If that’s the case, should I consider RA w.r.t People , process and technologies boundaries? or should I consider operational and business risks as well?
Thanks
Answer: In case your purpose is to ensure business continuity, considering the ISO 22301 standard, which provides requirements for business continuity management, then you should apply RA only for the process which you have in BIA (which are all the processes included in the Business Continuity Management System scope).
Regarding risk categories, ISO 22301 does not prescribe which ones to apply, so you can define the ones that better fit your needs.
To see how documents compliant with ISO 22301 BIA and RA looks like, please take a look at the free demos of these toolkits:
- ISO 22301 Business Impact Analysis Toolkit https://advisera.com/27001academy/iso22301-business-impact-analysis-documentation-toolkit/
- ISO 27001/ISO 22301 Risk Assessment Toolkit https://advisera.com/27001academy/iso-27001-22301-risk-assessment-toolkit/
... ssessment vs. business impact analysis https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/risk-assessment-vs-business-impact-analysis/
These materials will also help you regarding risk assessment and BIA: