Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
You asked
as a lab expert, do I also need ISO17025 certification in order to audit laboratories? Or is 9001 is sufficient?
There are very few options to obtain ISO 17025 auditing certification. As ISO 9001 is incorporated into the ISO 17025:2017 Management requirements and ISO 17025 Lead Auditor certification courses may not be as readily available, the ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Training Course is a good option. (see https://advisera.com/training/iso-9001-lead-auditor-course/)
There are two components to auditing to consider:
Auditing basics, roles and the principles of auditing covered in the ISO 9001 auditing course will be applicable to auditing ISO 17025 as well. In ISO 17025 auditing the lead auditor should have appropriate auditing skills to assess the management clauses, meaning all those that do not have a technical component. The technical auditor also needs to also have appropriate auditing skills but must also have the ability to audit the technical aspects, including method validation and measurement uncertainty, quality control. In other words the depth of knowledge and skill to delve deep enough into the risks and assess technical validity and competency. This experience comes from hands on working in a laboratory and attending additional training on technical matters. Based on your comments, this is experience you have.
If you choose to obtain ISO 17025:2017 Lead Auditor certification; select a suitable course offered by an approved Training Partners of an international certification body such as Exemplar Global (formally RABQSA) or IRCA (The International Register of Certificated Auditors).
Have a look at Advisera’s Certification FAQs at https://advisera.com/training/eu-gdpr-courses/ for further information regarding certification
We do not have a checklist, but here are some questions that you can ask:
For more information regarding storage, please see the following articles:
Glad you found the webinar interesting.
In terms of ISO 17025, the Quality Manager needs to be impartial, but need not, if the risk is accepted, be independent. There may however, for certain sectors be regulatory requirements or other standards; that require independence of the QM. What is important is the functional role in ISO 17025, for example the appointed laboratory manager my function as the QM as well, as long as risk is managed, and impartiality is evident.
There are some activities, where you should appoint an independent person; even a person reporting to you, or a colleague; to review for example, documents you author. Furthermore internal auditing requires independence so you will need to contract an independent third party consultant or an independent competent person from another department or sister company to assist with audits.
I think that MRM stands for Management Review Meeting:
Consider also the following information:
I think MOM for Manufacturing Operations Management:
Consider the following information:
Please check ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.5.2 c). Each organization has the authority to determine what is to be considered the appropriate review and approval for suitability and adequacy. Many smaller or centralized organizations decide that all procedures are approved by the owner or General Manager. Bigger and or more decentralized organizations determine that different documents can be approved by different functions and one or more functions. As a consultant, I ask organizations to write a document register where the authority to sign off each procedure is written, and that document is approved by top management. Showing clearly who has the authority to approve each document.
You can find more information about the documentation below:
If your organization wants to implement a quality management system (QMS) according to ISO 9001:2015 requirements you can start by reading this article - How to get ISO 9001 certified - https://advisera.com/9001academy/iso-9001-certification/
A possible approach to implement a QMS can be:
Then, an important step is to design a model of how your organization works as a set of interrelated processes. For example:
Decide how to describe and monitor those processes.
From there it is implementation in order to close the gaps found. Then, perform an internal audit and the management review. There you can decide if your organization is ready for a certification audit.
If you need to speed-up your implementation process you can consider our Documentation Toolkit for the implementation of ISO 9001:2015 here - https://advisera.com/9001academy/iso-9001-documentation-toolkit/ and check the free previews. You can also watch this free webinar on-demand - How to use a Documentation Toolkit for the implementation of ISO 9001 - https://advisera.com/9001academy/webinar/how-to-use-a-documentation-toolkit-for-the-implementation-of-iso-9001-free-webinar-on-demand/
This is a very short description of the journey but below you can find more detailed information:
You can find more information below:
You can find all enforcement decision issued by the Information Commissioner's Office on its website: https://ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/
There is also this Enforcement tracker where you can filter by country: https://www.enforcementtracker.com/
If you need more information about GDPR enforcement and how the Supervisory Authorities work, you can consider enrolling in our free online training EU GDPR Foundations Course: https://advisera.com/training/eu-gdpr-foundations-course//
I do not have enough information here, but the following requirements can be marked as non-applicable :
Maybe there are some more requirements that can be marked as non-applicable, but for defining that I need more information regarding the product.
For more information regarding the ISO 13485:2016, please see following articles:
For any other question regarding the ISO 13485:2016, please do not hesitate to ask us.
Although ISO 27001 requires the storage of specific documents and records (clause 7.5.3 d), and that changes on them are controlled (clause 7.5.3 e), it does not prescribe how to store them or control changes on them, so organizations are free to define the methods that best suit their needs.
Considering that, storing documents in Excel or Word form is acceptable by the standard. However, the version history feature in Office365 may not be sufficient, because it can help detect an unauthorized change, but cannot prevent it. One way to make your solution more robust, you can limit the users that can edit a document to a small group of users.
These articles will provide you a further explanation about documentation management:
These materials will also help you regarding documentation management:
By “system” you should understand software or set of software. For example, operational systems, Office 365, and SaaS applications are examples of systems.
When control A.13.1.1 (Network controls) requires a system to be authenticated, it means that the system must show proof that it is the system it claims to be (much like a human user must prove his identity when accessing a system or physical area), by means of presenting a password or one-time code provided by a token along with its identification. By adopting this control, you can ensure that only systems you know and have authorized can access your network. For example, when you access your organization’s network you need to provide your identification and authentication information, right? It is the same thing, only applied to systems (each system should have its own identification and authentication information).
When we talk about the restriction of system connection, we mean that a system should access only what is necessary for its activities. For example, a payment application should have access to the organization’s finance systems and customer databases, but most probably should not have access to HR systems or R&D applications.
These articles will provide you a further explanation about network controls:
These materials will also help you regarding network controls: