Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
1. What should be important considerations while defining Out of Scope in Statement of applicability?
I'm assuming that by "Out of Scope" you are meaning controls that are not applicable.
Considering that, for a control to be considered not applicable in the Statement of applicability you have to be sure that:
For further information, see:
2. If I have some systems which are currently running on obsolete technology or not in support technology, what does that mean for my ISO 27001 Stage 2 assessment and what impact it can have on certification?
If the information security risks related to these systems running in this situation are identified and evaluated as acceptable by your organization, then this situation won't have an impact in your certification process, because you performed the risk assessment and risk treatment required by the standard (ISO 27001 does not require you to treat all risks, only those considered unacceptable)
On the other hand, if you consider the risks related to this technology as not acceptable, you will have to implement applicable controls (safeguards) before going to the Stage 2 certification audit.
These articles will provide you a further explanation about the certification audit:
The control of records must satisfy statutory, regulatory, organizational, and customer requirements.
If there is no such requirement, the organization must establish its record retention periods. My advice is the periodic testing or simulation test records should keep between 3 and 5 years.
ISO 9001:2015 mentions "strategic direction" in clauses 4.1, 5.1.1b), 5.2.1 a) and 9.3.1.
ISO 9000:2015 defines strategy as "plan to achieve a long-term or overall objective".
Strategy is about establishing a set of consistent rules about what to do and whom to serve, and about what not to do and whom not to serve. Adopting and following those rules sets a path, an orientation, a direction: the strategic direction.
For example, if an organization decides to serve customers that value the lowest price above all, it has to concentrate on efficiency, on volume, on big orders, and look for process innovations that reinforce those topics. Another organization, in the same economic sector, may decide to serve customers that value premium-service. These organizations are different, require different processes or are managed with different priorities in mind. Just compare the profiles, priorities, and processes of a low-cost carrier with a top of the line carrier.
Please check these two free webinars on-demand where we relate quality policy and indicators
The Process Approach - What it is, why it is important, and how to do it - https://advisera.com/9001academy/webinar/iso-9001-process-approach-free-webinar-on-demand/
Measurement, analysis, and improvement according to ISO 9001:2015 - https://advisera.com/9001academy/webinar/measurement-analysis-and-improvement-according-to-iso-9001-2015-free-webinar/
The following material will provide you information about strategic orientation:
We are not experts in FedRAMP, SOC2, and NITS, but this situation is more like "adjustment" than "transition" because the safeguards required/used by the frameworks you mentioned can be used for ISO 27001 implementation (some of them can be linked to controls form the standard's Annex A). Your main concern should be compliance with the main clauses of the standard.
These articles will provide you a further explanation about the implementation of ISO 27001 and use of NIST framework:
These materials will also help you regarding ISO 27001 implementation:
ISO 27001 does not prescribe the content of the risk treatment plan, but as good practice, it should consider at least:
To see how a risk treatment plan looks like, please access the free demo of our Risk Treatment Plan at this link: https://advisera.com/27001academy/documentation/risk-treatment-plan/
This article will provide you further explanation about the risk treatment plan:
This is different from one certification body to the other - some require you to have ISMS in full operation for at least 3 months, while others do not have such a criteria. The best would be if you ask for proposals from a couple of certification bodies, and ask them this specific question.
These articles may also help you:
Good metrics are SMART:
These articles can provide you some examples:
Once the decision is made by Top management, if it impacts BCP procedures or policies guidelines, then you have to document the exception, according to your procedure for documents and records control.
As a suggestion for the text, you should consider include this exception as a sub-clause in the main topic of your document, defining it the details about how to handle this situation. For example:
Clause x - Backup
Clause x.x - Backup procedure during a pandemic
In case of a pandemic, the backup procedure must be made as follows: <from this point you must include the procedure specific for this case>
For every proposed corrective action the auditor must look for implementation evidence.
For example, if the proposed action is training, the auditor must look for certifications, attendance lists, or interview employees about the training topic. If the proposed action is a system update, the auditor must look for a change record or information about which is the most updated version of the system and verify if it is the same version in the system. If the proposed action is the installation of a CCTV system, the auditor must look for the installed cameras and see if they are operational.
This article will provide you further explanation about Corrective actions:
In the following diagram you can see the main steps of an audit and the outcomes of each step:
In the following diagram you can see the key inputs for any audit: the scope, the criteria and the objectives:
You can get much more information in the following links: