From a business point of view, you should first finish the implementation that will bring your organization the biggest benefits, then go for the other implementation. You should avoid implement standards together if you understand this can increase the difficulties without bringing proportional benefits.
Dear Sir,
Many thanks for your response and explain.
Regards,
Life cycle consideration
I am wondering to what extent we are expected to control/influence these outsourced processes. We ensure any relevant products are CE complaint etc, are transported correctly, and do not contain any banned substances. But what we don't do is control/monitor the processes within their factories to ensure they are environmentally friendly.
I am worried when we get audited the auditor will find some non-conformances because of this. Do you have any advice as to what is expected by this clause for a small business like ourselves? In this scenario would a simple statement be sufficient to explain this and state that we have asked the supplier to consider all environmental impacts it is causing? I would much appreciate any advice?”
According to your organization’s particular context, you should determine which stages of the lifecycle you can control or influence. Remember that the word used by ISO 14001:2015 is “consideration” not a very strong requirement. Therefore, it is necessary to realistically assess what is actually controllable and what can be influenced and act accordingly.
The following material will provide you with information about the life cycle perspective:
Answer:
Internal audit can be done with internal audit certificate, that certificate is proof of competence for a person to conduct an internal audit.
2. Where could I find info on this matter?
Answer:
Internal audit against requirements of IATF 16949 must be performed by a competent person as defined in chapter 7, 7.2.3 Internal auditor competency. Based on it organization shall retain documented information to demonstrate the trainer's competency with these requirements.
Maintenance and improvement must be verified by:
• Minimum number of audits per year – as defined by the organization
• Maintaining knowledge of the relevant requirements (technology, standards, methods, customer-specific requirements)
So, if internal auditor left the company and wants to do the internal audit as an external party, he can do it if he can prove that he has the minimum number of audits and maintaining knowledge of relevant requirements (especially customer-specific requirements)
Or the types of questions to direct to CISO, CIO, or CTO to identify the types of technologies they have implemented to mitigate future cyberattacks.
Answer:
First it is important to understand that in general the C-level will not think directly about risk (neither they have to), so you have to make questions about their concerns regarding the business objectives (which are them, which are the most important, and why) and how information can help achieve these objectives, or prevent these of being achieved. From these answers you will be able to identify their risk posture, the most relevant risks and what you can do to treat them.
Another important issue is that in general these questions are as ked by the responsible for the information security (i.e., the CISO or similar role).
They can guide you on how to define the purpose, direction, principles and basic rules for information security management, and how to manage the security of cloud environment infrastructure.
You need to perform an internal audit and corrective actions for identified nonconformities before applying for certification so you can provide evidences of audits results required by the standard (e.g., audit report, nonconformities action plans, etc.). Additionally, the results of internal audit are required for the management review, another mandatory requirement for certification.
P – Profit
Q – Quantity
P – Productivity
D – Development
Q – Quality
C – Cost
D – Delivery
M – Morale (including safety, training, attrition, rewards/awards/appreciation)
The very first parameter is not easy to calculate. Pl. suggest”
Answer:
These things are not calculated sequentially but iteratively. I arrange your items according to the figure below in a sort of cause-effect relationship map.
Be aware of which items are critical to winning your target customers. Customers are not all alike, some value innovation and development, others value service and flexibility, and others value price above all. Operational perspective topics should be a function of your target-customers and not a general list.
Personally, I look into profit as a consequence of all other things. Your organization invests in resources and infrastructures, in order to be excellent at the operational perspective, to have results at the customer perspective translated into financial results. Your organization may need a certain level of profit to be sustainable or attractive to investors, you can start with a figure and see what level of sales, costs, and prices you need and evaluate if it is reasonable and attainable. Perhaps your organization concludes that it has to change its strategy in order to meet a certain level of profit.
According ISO 27001, clause 7.2 (Competence), competences are based on appropriate education, training, or experience, which can be evidenced by means of certificates (e.g., ISO 27001 Lead Auditor or ISO 27001 Internal auditor), registered hours of work on specific activities (in this case audits on ISO 27001 or other ISO management systems), and records of attended trainings.
These materials will also help you with internal audit issues:
- ISO 27001:2013 Internal Auditor Course htt ps://advisera.com/training/iso-27001-internal-auditor-course/
- ISO Internal Audit: A Plain English Guide https://advisera.com/books/iso-internal-audit-plain-english-guide/
Incident response plan
Answer:
I'm assuming you are referring to the Incident Response Plan mentioned on section 3.4 of the Incident Management Procedure template. Considering that, first is important to note that an Incident Response Plan is needed only if you have an incident where activities are disrupted for a time above which is considered acceptable by business. If you have no situations like that, you do not have to develop an Incident Response Plan.
In case an Incident Response Plan is needed, it must include actions to:
- contain or stop the incident, in case it is still occurring
- minimize the im pacts of the incident
- recover minimal service levels
- recover normal operational conditions
And of course for each activity you have to define who will perform them.