I want to know if there is no production of medical machine after successfully ISO 13485 and ISO 9001:2008 what will be the consequences in future surveillance audits, as ISO 9001:2015 is update from 2008 so it is necessary to implement ISO 9001:2015 in surveillance audit?
If you want to maintain your ISO 9001 certificate, you will need to make transition to the new version of the standard until September 2018. This can be done during surveillance audits or re-certification audits. In my opinion, it is better to conduct it during re-certification audit since the cost of the surveillance audit is smaller than the re-certification and getting certified against new version of ISO 9001 is practically a certification audit and will be charged appropriately. The same rule applies to ISO 13485 as well.
Since ISO 13485:2016 is developed according to ISO 9001:2008, you won't have too much problems making the transition because all elements of ISO 9001:2008 will remain in the new version. When making transition to ISO 9001:2015 you will basically only need to add new requirements (context of the organization, risks and opportunities, etc) and leave all the old elements (quality manual, preventive actions, etc) because they are still required by ISO 13485:2016.
Answer: The activities in a surveillance audit are practically the same as for a certification audit (opening meeting, documentation review, operations review, etc.), the difference being that the surveillance audit scope is smaller and they are more focused on daily management system operations, instead on the verification if all mandatory requirements are implemented.
2 - What requirements are evaluated during this audit?
Answer: The requirements to be reviewed will depend on the surveillance plan that is established after the certification audit by the certification body. But there are elements that are always present, like management review, SoA review, audit process review and non conformity and corrective actions review.
Answer: Only ISO 27001 is not enough. EU GDPR focus is on protection of personal information, and ISO 27001 focus is to protect information in general. From the ISO 27000 family, ISO/IEC 27018 should also be consulted (Code of practice for protection of personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds acting as PII processors).
“The organization shall establish, implement and maintain a design and development process that is appropriate to ensure the subsequent provision of products and services”.
My interpretation of this clause is; organisation should design and develop process FOR provision of products and services. The organisation I work for generate, transmit and distribute electricity. Am I wrong that the standard is not interested in the design of electricity but wants us to design and develop processes to provide that electricity and associated services?
Clause 6.1 reads as thus; “When planning for the quality management system, the organization shall consider the issues referred to in 4.1 and the requirements referred to in 4.2 and determine the risks and opportunities that need to be addressed.
The reading of the clause gives me an indication that risks and opportunities should first be Determined in relation to the “QMS Processes defined” in response to clause 4.4 and then ACTION taken.
Please help me in interpreting these clauses 6.1 and 8.3
Answer: Organization needs to consider risks and opportunities emerging from the context of the organization and that includes he QMS processes. Actions to address risks and opportunities cannot be defined or taken without identifying risks and opportunities first.
The article you've reading is written according to ISO 9001:2008 which required management representative as a mandatory role in QMS (Quality Management System). New version of the standard does not require management representative as a mandatory role, however the standard still requires roles and responsibilities within the QMS to be assigned.
Since the official version of ISO 45001 is not published yet (it is expected by the end of this year), I can only tell you what I know based on the draft version of the standard. Keep in mind that this is subjected to change and we cannot know with 100% certainty what will be requirements for documentation of the official ISO 45001 before it is published.
The most important group of documents needed for implementation of ISO 45001 are the ones explicitly required by the standard, the company must have these documents in order to be compliant with the standard. This includes the policy, objectives, procedures and records.
The second group of the documents are the ones that are not mandatory but the company finds them necessary for maintaining the Occupational Health and Safety Management System, this can be various procedures, policies, work instructions and records that can be useful for maintaining the system although they are not explicitly required by the standard.
Our management approach was to select a team and provide them with a training in order for this team to implement the system instead of hiring a consultant.
Therefore, it is a bit challenging; however, we are doing our best.
The question i would like to ask is when the certification body comes to audit the QMS in the organization will the audit be done only against the quality policy and the quality objectives stated in the QMS Manual? or will the audit also will be done against the policies and procedures published in the organization?
Answer:
The certification audit will cover the entire scope of your QMS (Quality Management System), this includes review of all your QMS documentation (1st stage of the audit) and auditing of your processes and activities against your procedures and requirements of the standard (2nd stage audit).
The standard itself doesn't require procedure for determining context of the organization to be documented, but if you choose to do so, the best way is to explain in the procedure how determining of the context will be conducted, who will participate, what elements of the context will be considered and so on. Here you can download a free preview of our Procedure for Determining Context of the Organization and Interested Parties https://advisera.com/14001academy/documentation/procedure-for-determining-context-of-the-organization-and-interested-parties/
Answer: What ISO 27001 requires is that an organization considers its context and assesses its risks to implement proper controls to bring risks to acceptable levels. So the decision for immediate removal of users access is up to each organization, based on its risk assessments, legal or contractual requirements.