Thank you for your note, and for the very useful procedures and supporting records.
From my point of view, one item which is not fully covered in the suite of templates is a procedure to define how impartiality is dealt with (refence 17025:4.1.4).
I guess that the procedural steps would be something like:
- Document anticipated risks which compromise the effective management of impartiality
- Develop counter-measures to those mitigate risks which are currently unacceptable
- Monitor and improve as time goes by, especially by making this an agenda item for management review
Do you have a draft procedure which I could use as a starting point for this area?