Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
Although ISO 9001 requirements are very integrated into ISO 17025, as the approach and purpose are different (being customer focussed), you need to assess whether your compliance for certain ISO 9001 requirements is adequate. If your laboratory went straight to ISO 17025 accreditation, i.e Option A (not preceded with ISO 9001 certification) there may be gaps that exist. Depending on the extent a laboratory develops its QMS beyond the minimum requirements of ISO 17025, the level of ISO 9001 compliance differ. I suggest you do a gap analysis of your current QMS to the specific requirements of ISO 9001.
Look at the article ISO 17025 vs. ISO 9001 – Similarities and differences at https://advisera.com/17025academy/blog/2019/07/11/iso-17025-vs-iso-9001-main-differences-and-similarities/
Also have a look at the Advisera 9001 academy resources at https://advisera.com/9001academy/, which includes resources to assist, such as whitepaper Clause-by-clause explanation of ISO 9001:2015 and the ISO 9001:2015 Gap Analysis Tool.
ISO 27001 Leal Auditor certification issued by an accredited training provider is a globally recognized certification, being accepted all Europe and US.
We are not aware of any specific legislation enforcing or forbidding the acceptance of such certification, however, the lead auditor certification is a requirement for people who want to work for certification bodies as certification auditors.
To determine whether ISO 27001 Lead Auditor certification is enforced or forbidden in specific countries, you should look for expert legal advice in the countries where you want to operate.
This article will provide you with further explanation about the ISO27001 lead auditor course:
- What does ISO 27001 Lead Auditor training look like? https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2016/08/29/what-does-iso-27001-lead-auditor-training-look-like/
This material will also help you regarding the ISO27001 lead auditor course:
- ISO 27001 Lead Auditor course https://advisera.com/training/iso-27001-lead-auditor-course/
No, process capability analysis for the use of process control is not a requirement in ISO 9001:2015
However, if it is a client requirement it must be performed.
The Recovery Time Objective (RTO) means how fast after a disaster an organization wants its business to resume operations, and its definition is made through the Business Impact Analysis, which helps you understand the level of resources are required and the evolution of losses over time (in shorth, the faster the losses increases over time, the shorter the RTO needs to be, and more resources will be required).
As a reference to evaluate how much resources are enough, you should consider the losses to the organization if the operations are not resumed in a given time. For example, if the losses for not returning in 12h are US$ 200k, and the resources required to return operations at this time cost US$ 250k, then it is not practical to define an RTO of 12h. On the other hand, if the losses for not returning in 14h are US$ 1M, and the resources required to return operations at this time cost US$ 750k, then it is practical to define an RTO of 24h.
These articles will provide you with a further explanation about business continuity concepts:
First of all, congratulations on your approval.
Included in the toolkit you purchased you are entitled to receive free updates for one year after your purchase date. In this situation, you will receive documents considering the appropriate changes. We will send you the updated toolkit shortly after the ISO 27001 update is officially published.
Considering the explicitly stated missing parts, please note that ISO 22301 does not require policy statements, definitions, compliance, and consequences for Non-Compliance.
While we agree that such items could be considered, our templates are designed to fulfill the standard’s requirements with minimum overhead to minimize administrative effort to keep and maintain them.
In terms of policy, ISO 22301 clause 5.2.1 requires: alignment with the organization’s purpose, an approach to defining business continuity objectives, commitment to fulfilling legal requirements, and commitment to the continual improvement of the Business Continuity Management System.
In case you want to include such items in your own policy, you can schedule a meeting with one of our experts so he can help you develop them.
For further information, see:
- The purpose of Business continuity policy according to ISO 22301 https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2013/06/04/the-purpose-of-business-continuity-policy-according-to-iso-22301/
1. How should we treat the risk assessment process? Should we consider all the risks within our company and go over a bit or should we be more conservative? For example, should we consider our CEO being on leave as a risk while doing the risk assessment?
Considering the Conformio platform, first, you need to define your Risk Assessment and Risk Treatment Methodology. In the document provided by Conformio, you will define the risk acceptance criteria, i.e., when identified and analyzed risks must be treated. Conformio automatically determines which risks need to be treated based on the acceptance criteria you define.
For further information, see:
2. In terms of SoA should we mark all the controls as applicable? How should we approach this?
Considering the Conformio platform, Conformio automatically marks controls applicable based on the results of risk assessment and legal requirements.
For further information, see:
Please note that considering ISO 27001, if private information is part of the Information Security Management System scope, the CISO will have to protect it anyway. The fact that the organization may need to be compliant with some legal requirements related to private information (e.g., EU GDPR) will only mean that there are additional requirements to be considered by the CISO for the protection of this kind of information.
In cases where all private information handled by the organization is part of the ISMS scope, the CISO may also be designated as the DPO.
In such scenarios, you may want to consider the use of ISO 27701 which defines requirements for a Privacy Information Security Management System.
For further information, see:
I’m considering that when you mention “security concepts”, and the listed standards, you mean “information security” concepts.
Considering that, the three standards can be useful to you because together they cover concepts for both governance and management of information security:
- ISO 27000 covers the general concepts about information security
- ISO 27001 presents concepts related to information security management, i.e., how to identify and treat information security risks, and this standard requires the engagement of management
- ISO 27014 covers concepts of Information Security Governance, i.e., on how to evaluate, direct, monitor, and communicate the information security-related activities within the organization
You can also check this doctoral thesis from Dejan Kosutic that describes a holistic approach to cybersecurity management through a socio-technical system that balances strategic, organizational, risk & technology, and people aspects: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357826918_The_Impact_of_Cybersecurity_on_Competitive_Advantage
For further information, see:
- Should information security focus on asset protection, compliance, or corporate governance? https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2017/03/13/information-security-focus-asset-protection-compliance-corporate-governance/
- Integration of Information Security, IT and Corporate Governance https://info.advisera.com/27001academy/free-download/integration-of-information-security-it-and-corporate-governance
1 - I would like to know how these new controls affect our purchased toolkit (Cloud_EN)?
Reference: https://info.advisera.com/27001academy/free-download/overview-of-new-security-controls-in-fdis-iso-27002
Included in the toolkit you purchased you are entitled to receive free updates for one year after your purchase date. In this situation, you will receive documents considering the appropriate changes.
2 - Should we include this new change in our implementation?
Yes, you will need to implement the changes in controls.
Is important to note that any required changes will have a transition period to be implemented after the release of a new version of ISO 27001 (in general this transition period is of two years after a change in a management system standard, which is plenty of time to do this transition for most controls).