Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
The Validation procedure for the new machine consists of the following elements: installation qualification, operational qualification, and performance qualification. The purpose of the validation is to prove that the new machine works correctly and provide accurate and expected results. Installation qualification confirms that the exact required equipment has been received and installed, in the correct design or format in undamaged form with parts, spare parts, gauges, and other necessary elements. Operational qualification ensures that the installed equipment will function in accordance with all its operational specifications in the specified environmental conditions. Performance qualification ensures that the installed equipment consistently performs its functions in accordance with the specification corresponding to its daily/routine use.
For each validation, you need to have a validation plan and validation report. Validation report must have the following elements:
For more information, see:
As this apparatus was already in use, I assume that it was listed in the Record List_of_Laboratory_Equipment (8.1_Appendix_1). You could indicate in this record that it “removed or retired”, i.e. taken of service, by adding another column. I would use this option if you are a laboratory that has a big turnover of equipment. Otherwise just remove the entry from the record, strikeover the text or add a comment and save an updtated revision of the record. If you already have an Equipment_Maintenance_Record (Appendix_4) for the apparatus, record in there as well, that the apparatus is out of service.
Don’t forget if you are storing the item in the laboratory to mark it clearly as “out of service” as well.
Please note that ISO 27001 does not require "mapping" or documenting of each and every process in the Information Security Management System (ISMS) scope.
For example, the HR process does not need to be documented, but if you decide to write it, you only need to document it in the level necessary for the people using them to perform their jobs correctly and securely.
For example, the documentation detail level for experienced personnel will be much lesser than for novice personnel.
These articles will provide you a further explanation about documentation development:
- How detailed should the ISO 27001 documents be? https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2014/09/22/detailed-iso-27001-documents/
- 8 criteria to decide which ISO 27001 policies and procedures to write https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2014/07/28/8-criteria-to-decide-which-iso-27001-policies-and-procedures-to-write/
- List of mandatory documents required by ISO 27001 (2013 revision) https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/list-of-mandatory-documents-required-by-iso-27001-2013-revision/
A política de dispositivo móvel não foi revista. Uma atualização apropriada da política de acordo com o contexto da sua organização requer a realização de uma avaliação de riscos de segurança da informação para identificar quais novos riscos relevantes surgiram, para que se possa identificar os controles adequados a serem aplicados.
Este artigo fornecerá mais explicações sobre a avaliação de risco:
If a laboratory (the Conformity Assessment Body - CAB) performs sampling at the source, e.g a factory or river, to collect a sample for testing; only then does clause 7.3 Sampling apply. Another way of putting it is a laboratory is not responsible for sampling if the sample is taken by another party and brought in or delivered for testing. That is, clause 7.3 does not apply. The other party could for example, be either the production department, researchers or other clients. Typically laboratories will state in the Quality Manual that Clause 7.3 requirements of ISO 17025 are not applicable as they do not perform sampling,
There may be certain situations, where it is necessary, to meet Clients purpose of the test, for the laboratory to provide sampling and transport instructions or guidance to assist the client present a more representative, stable sample. This is to ensure the sample result is more representative of the source as a whole (e.g a drinking water well). The client should also be informed as to what information to record, like date of sampling. This is crucial information for the interpretation of many results. Once the sample arrives at the laboratory any sample splitting, aliquoting or handling is covered other the other technical requirements, including clause 7.4 Handling of test or calibration items.
For more information on the requirements of ISO 17025, download the free White Paper Clause-by-clause explanation of ISO 17025:2017 at https://info.advisera.com/17025academy/free-download/clause-by-clause-explanation-of-iso-17025
I’m assuming that by CSM you mean Customer Support Management.
Considering that, to be compliant with ISO 27001, besides the mandatory documents and records, to define which documents would be required, you would need to consider elements like:
- relevant risks
- compliance with legal requirements (e.g., laws, regulations, and contracts)
- company size
- process importance, complexity, and maturity
- number of people involved
- frequency of use
For example, regarding compliance with legal requirements, there might be a customer requirement to classify data exchanged through customer service which you would cover through Classification Policy, or there might be a regulation which requires the protection of customer personal data with encryption which you would cover through Encryption Policy.
This article will provide you a further explanation about which document to develop:
- 8 criteria to decide which ISO 27001 policies and procedures to write https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2014/07/28/8-criteria-to-decide-which-iso-27001-policies-and-procedures-to-write/
This article will provide you information about ISO 27001 mandatory documents and records, as well as the most commonly used documents:
- List of mandatory documents required by ISO 27001 (2013 revision) https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/list-of-mandatory-documents-required-by-iso-27001-2013-revision/
To fulfill ISO 27001 requirements related to competence (clause 7.2), you need to identify which competencies are necessary for doing work that affects information security performance.
While the Security Awareness Training, GDPR e-learning, and training about policies and procedures most probably will fulfill part of the requirement, you need to check if more specific activities are required. For example, training on a specific technology used by your organization, or on a new process that needs to be implemented, like a disaster recovery process.
This article will provide you a further explanation about training and awareness:
If there are certified calibrators for the test method then you could provide the traceability that way.
I suggest you contact the national accreditation body or preferred accreditation body and discuss what programme your work would fall under. Then you will know if you need to address traceabilty as a calibration test (i.e calibration lab) or equipment performance test (i.e a testing lab). At the same time, the accreditation body will be able to provide an estimate of the costs to apply for accreditation.
Then regarding your implementation costs, they will depend on your scope of work and whether you use a consultant or a toolkit. For more information have a look at my response to a similar question regrding costs; at https://community.advisera.com/topic/iso-17025-accreditation-2/. There are number of links there to assist with further.
Firstly, note that procedure can be either documented or not whereas all work instructions are documented. A documented procedure could be a Standard operating procedure (SOP) or a Test Method. A SOP documents a higher level of information to standardise a full procedure. It covers who is responsible for what, what and how activities are carried out and a certain amount of operational detail, especially if there are no separate Work instructions as appendices / attachments. An example would be a SOP for a particular test. This type of SOP would typically include several steps and tasks, such as preparing the sample, calibrating the instrument, analysing the sample, and reporting the results.
A work instruction on the other hand is used to document the detailed steps of how to perform a particular task, for example how to perform a daily verification of a balance. That said, bear in mind that documentation could include any media. Thus, a work instruction could be written out as text, a diagram, audio file or video; or a combination thereof. SOPs are typically written out as text, with diagrams and tables included.
Have a look at the following material where you can obtain more information about documentation structure:
ISO 9001 – How to structure quality management system documentation - https://advisera.com/9001academy/knowledgebase/how-to-structure-quality-management-system-documentation
Thanks for the quick reply, much appreciated 😀