Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
No, la base giuridica del trattamento nelle banche dati pubbliche è da rinvenirsi nella legge e nell'interesse pubblico. Il diritto di cancellazione, di cui all'articolo 17 GDPR, consente all'interessato di ottenere la cancellazione dei propri dati in alcune circostanze e a condizione che non si applichino le eccezioni. Tra le eccezioni, l'art. 17 paragrafo 3 lett. b) GDPR include l'interesse pubblico ed è il motivo per cui non è possibile ottenere la cancellazione.
Se vuoi sapere di più sui diritti dell'interessato, qui puoi trovare un articolo:
Se invece vuoi saperne di più su come implementare il GDPR, puoi iscriverti al corso EU GDPR Foundations Course: https://advisera.com/training/eu-gdpr-foundations-course/
In your second paragraph, I’m assuming you are referring to control A.8.3.2, instead of A.8.2.3.
Considering that, please note that these controls have different coverages:
You can think of control A.11.2.7 as a specific application of control A.8.3.2, although these controls can be applied independently of each other.
For further information, see:
First, design and development are not something only applicable to products. It is also applicable to services.
You wrote “sale of electronic products and provides technical assistance services”. I think that the answer to your question
“I would like to know if the procedure for design and development can be applied in my company?”
Depends on how your organization writes the scope of the management system. If the scope is closed, it lists all the technical assistance services provided under the management system, all services are already designed and developed. Any new services provided will not be included under the scope. In that case, design and development are not applicable. However, if your scope is open, if it is more generic, to be applicable to new services to be designed and developed in the future, then design and development are applicable.
For more information about exclusion, the right ISO wording is applicability, consider the following:
To meet ISO 17025 requirements, the testing laboratory must label, code or identify in some way that allows the user of the equipment to identify the calibration status or period of validity. As long as this is very clear to the user, there is no mandatory need to have a sticker placed by the third party calibration laboratory. The relevant documention (calibration certifcate) must also be available to the user.
For more information see What does ISO 17025:2017 require for laboratory measurement equipment and related procedures? at https://advisera.com/17025academy/blog/2019/07/25/iso-17025-measurement-requirements-of-the-standard/
There are differences in requirements for ISO 17025 accreditation and GMP certification. It is outside of the scope of the ISO 17025 Academy to comment on regulatory requirements, for example that of Health Canada. I suggest you contact the regulatory body.
For more information on ISO 17025, have a look at What is ISO 17025 at
https://advisera.com/17025academy/what-is-iso-17025/
Multi-site or group certifications are possible for management systems, although they are not common across continents. The real determination is the applicability of the QMS rules and polices across the different locations, if this is too different then a multi-site certification can be difficult. The certification comes down to the scope identified for the QMS, and this scope can include one location or several, but as stated if the multiple locations are very different from each other in processes, products or services this can be difficult. Additionally, legal requirements may be different across locations on different continents.
It is also important to note that not all certification bodies will be willing to do a certification like this. To certify multiple locations, you will need all locations audited and this may not be possible or accepted for all certification bodies.
You can read a bit more on scope of the QMS in these articles from the 9001Academy which are applicable: How to define the scope of the QMS according to ISO 9001:2015, https://advisera.com/9001academy/blog/2015/10/13/how-to-define-the-scope-of-the-qms-according-to-iso-90012015/ and Certifying different legal entities under one certification scope in ISO 9001, https://advisera.com/9001academy/blog/2018/03/27/certifying-different-legal-entities-under-one-certification-scope-in-iso-9001/
For small companies (up to 50 employees) it is not critical that the project sponsor do not get directly involved with the project. This “no involvement” is normally defined because the project sponsor is often part of top management, and if he gets to involved with the project (i.e., acts as a project manager), this situation may end impacting his other functions.
In case the managing director (MD) has the necessary authority to solve problems that can make the project stuck, and make decisions to ensure project success, there is no problem for this role to be assigned as the project sponsor, instead of the chairman.
For further information, see:
I am working on implementing the ISO 9001 standard for an Information Technology company. They do not have any in-house manufacturing of equipment or hardware. They only offer IT services such as Managed Services, Cybersecurity, reseller or Hardware, a reseller of Software, VoIP, Access control.
What clauses will be applicable for them in ISO9001?
Answer:
ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.5 is not only about manufacturing, it is about “Production and service provision”. So, 8.5 applies to service provision. It’s like a delivery services company being ISO 9001 certified.
While implementing ISO 9001 for certification, only clauses from section 8 can be candidates for classification as non-applicable. ISO 9001:2015 is a generic standard applicable to all kinds of organizations. The company:
Inside 8.5 typical candidates for non-applicability are:
Also, do you have a toolkit that is specifically for IT industry?
Answer:
No, we do not have an ISO 9001 toolkit specific to the IT industry. However, support 1on1 is provided to clients. Perhaps, in your case, this tool kit “ITIL® AND ISO 20000 DOCUMENTATION” - https://advisera.com/20000academy/ used together with this free document - “ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011 vs. ISO 9001:2015 matrix”
- https://info.advisera.com/20000academy/free-download/iso-iec-20000-1-2011-vs-iso-9001-2015-matrix?_gl=1*ud8gcr*_ga*MTI5NjM5NjM3LjE2MjcyOTkzOTY.*_ga_4P5GYSBRB2*MTYzMTAwMDYyNi4zMS4xLjE2MzEwMDIwNTQuNjA. This document is being updated according to ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018
While considering the use of ISO 9001 for software development activities, consider this support ISO/IEC/IEEE 90003:2018 - Software engineering — Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:2015 to computer software - https://www.iso.org/standard/74348.html
please go on
According to the Article 32. Safety and clinical performance must be performed only for implantable devices and for class III devices, other than custom-made or investigational devices. Therefore, this article and this requirement from GSPR are not applicable to you.