Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
From your question is not clear if you are referring to an internal auditor or a certification auditor, so the answer will cover both situations.
The “DIY with expert support” approach does not change the main points you need to consider.
When looking for an auditor to perform an internal audit you should consider:
We are not aware of specific jobs, boards, or professional associations of ISO 27001 internal auditors, so your best approach would be looking for them on professional social networks like LinkedIn, ISO 27001 security group on Google Groups, or organizations which issue certificates for information security professionals like ISC2 or ISACA.
For further information, see:
When looking for an auditor to perform a certification audit you need in fact to look for a certification body, and for this, there are several factors you should take into account when selecting a certification body, please read this article:
The main certification bodies for ISO 27001 are:
You can also find a proper certification body at this link: https://advisera.com/blog/2021/01/11/how-to-choose-an-iso-certification-body/
You can use this link to enter your profile, and we will find the certification body that best fits your needs.
No, records should be reviewed by the function with the authority to do it. If we are speaking of records from the purchasing area perhaps your quality system determines that review for content and approval is made by a function in the purchasing department.
During internal audits, auditors can audit records for content and approval.
You can find more information about documentation below:
ISO 9001 in its latest version of 2015 does not require a quality manual. So, a quality manual is no longer mandatory. However, as a consultant working with organizations, I recommend developing a quality manual.
Since it is no longer mandatory, we are free to design its content. I recommend designing a document that presents the quality management system. Presenting:
In plain English would be something like:
The following material will provide you information about the quality manual:
I´m assuming that by registrar you are referring to a certification body.
Considering that, the main certification bodies for ISO 27001 are:
From their main site, you can verify if they have offices in your country.
To help you select a certification body, I recommend these materials:
This material will also help you regarding preparation for certification:
The best way to calculate the Return on Security Investment (ROSI) is to relate the investment in information security with the economic benefits that this will bring to the business. The calculation of the ROSI can be based on:
This free tool can be very useful to give you an idea of how to calculate ROSI:
This article can be also interesting for you:
Please note that the “shall” word in this clause refers to all documents defined as mandatory by the standard and to those considered necessary by the organization. It does not specifically define a procedure for documentation control as mandatory.
So a documentation control procedure is not mandatory.
This article will provide you a further explanation about ISO 27001 mandatory documents:
- List of mandatory documents required by ISO 27001 (2013 revision) https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/list-of-mandatory-documents-required-by-iso-27001-2013-revision/
These materials will also help you regarding ISO 27001 documents:
- Managing ISO Documentation: A Plain English Guide https://advisera.com/books/managing-iso-documentation-plain-english-guide/
- Free online training ISO 27001 Foundations Course https://advisera.com/training/iso-27001-foundations-course/
The applicable standard for all non-medical testing laboratories is ISO 17025:2017. Depending on the country and accreditation body, a specific program may be on offer. For example, under Life Sciences where the accreditation body will have mandatory additional criteria and recommendations for testing genetically modified (GM) material. An accreditation body could offer a flexible scope of accreditation for laboratories quantifying GMOs. In the European Union for example, there is a published guideline for such flexible scopes. You can go to https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publications-list and search for the keywords “flexible scope GMO”.
In some cases the program would be under General Testing, where accreditation would be per test; for example Material type: Foods and Food Products – Rice: Detection of genetically modified organism; or under the Biological program, for example Screening for Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) by Immunoassay. I suggest you contact your accreditation body to find out the specific program and additional criteria.
For general information regarding ISO 17025, have a look at the article What is ISO 17025? at https://advisera.com/17025academy/what-is-iso-17025/
First is important to note that only because you are transferring the risk to a cloud provider, it does not mean the risk will be automatically lower. It only means that it will be handled by other entities, which in most cases will have a better cost-benefit relation when comparing to treating the risk yourself.
Considering that, to get by extension the benefits of a certified cloud provider, and ensure the provider will handle your data properly, you need to have a contract or service agreement with it covering your security needs. So, instead of implementing controls related directly to the identified risks, you will need to consider for them controls to handle supplier relationships.
These articles will provide you a further explanation about supplier security:
These materials will also help you regarding supplier security:
I’m assuming that by compliance you mean activities related to ISO 27001 audit.
Considering that, you have two options:
These articles will provide you a further explanation about ISO 27001 personnel certifications:
For courses related to these certifications, please see: