Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
If there are changes in the SOA after certifying the company you have to:
Basically, you have to perform the risk assessment and treatment again.
For further information, see:
Regarding the external audit, when the SoA is changed you need to inform the certification body about the changes made, so it can verify if the surveillance audit needs adjustment, either in duration or in the number of required auditors, due to the change in the number of applicable controls. You need to communicate this as soon as possible.
I am sorry but your case does not involve the GDPR aspect, but it involves how the Union fulfilled the obligation of providing legal assistance. You should verify with a lawyer if the Union abused somehow of powers of representation you provided to handle the case. From your question I understand that you asked for legal aid, not for legal representation, you provided your personal data, so the Union has the right to process your data. If they misrepresented you, in front of your employer it is an aspect that does not involve data processing. You should contact a lawyer to verify if the Union acted correctly.
Here you can find more information on the legal basis to process personal data according to the GDPR:
If you want to learn how personal data are processed under the EU GDPR you may consider enrolling in our free training EU GDPR Foundations: https://advisera.com/training/eu-gdpr-foundations-course//
Let us use ISO 9001:2015 as our guide. After a non-conformity being detected, a supplier may decide to ask for a derogation by the customer. According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.7 the supplier must keep records evidencing that the customer authorized the derogation. There is no requirement about what kind of record is to be used. The supplier may use its own internal NC and ask the customer to use it for evidence approval, or the supplier may annex an e-mail from the customer to evidence that approval.
You can find more information about improvement in the following links:
1. Is there an ISO certification we should look at?
Please note that ISO certifications are not mandatory by themselves, although some countries have established laws and regulations that are easier to be fulfilled by adopting them, and an increased number of customers are preferring ISO-certified organizations as suppliers because they consider such organizations are more capable to help them.
Considering that, you need to evaluate your legal environment and customers’ profile to see if an ISO certification is interesting to you.
Broadly speaking, IT Managed Service Providers, should consider the following certifications:
These standards share many common requirements, so you can implement them in an integrated way.
These articles will provide you a further explanation about ISO standards:
This article can provide you a customer point of view (the same general concept applies to all ISO management standards):
2. What would be involved to get certified and what sort of costs would we expect?
After the implementation of documents and controls required by the specific standard, you need to make sure that everyone in the company is complying with documents, i.e., performing all the activities prescribed there. After that, you can work on selecting your certification body.
Our toolkit can help you with the implementation:
These articles will provide you a further explanation about the ISO 27001 implementation process:
Regarding costs, without detailed information about the certification scope it is not possible to give you a precise answer, but broadly speaking, what I can tell you is that these are some cost issues you should consider:
These materials can provide you more information:
For the duration of the implementation:
These materials will also help you regarding ISO 27001 project:
Besides our webinars, to support your ISO 27001 implementation in Advisera you can find:
Regarding specialists, you may consider a specialist in the ISO 27001 standard (with our toolkit this need is reduced to a minimum) and specialists in your core processes and technologies.
These articles will provide you a further explanation about ISO 27001:
These materials will also help you regarding ISO 27001:
Besides information about specific controls in our blog (https://advisera.com/iso-27001/), and how to apply them, these materials may also help you:
Além de informações sobre controles específicos em nosso blog (https://advisera.com/iso-27001/) e como aplicá-los, esses materiais também podem ajudá-lo:
Visão geral do Anexo A da ISO 27001:2013 https://advisera.com/27001academy/pt-br/knowledgebase/visao-geral-do-anexo-a-da-iso-270012013/
ISO 27001 Annex A Controls in Plain English https://advisera.com/books/iso-27001-annex-controls-plain-english/
Simply stated, measurement uncertainty cannot be ignored when it comes to conformity statements reported under accreditation. During contract review a laboratory must confirm with the customer that it can meet the requirements for accuracy and are able to perform the measurements. The issue of Measurement uncertainty must be discussed and evaluated to avoid the risk of false pass (acceptance), as the uncertainty could result in the measurement reported being larger than the specification, due to the uncertainty component,
If the expanded measurement uncertainty is smaller than the accuracy requirements of the regulators or client, then the agreed decision rule could, for example, be: “PASS” indicates that the test method conforms with the accuracy requirements of the testing standard. The expanded measurement uncertainty (k = 2 ,95 % probability) is not greater than the accuracy requirements defined as <value>. You could also refer to a table.
For more information, refer to the ILAC guideline G8:09/2019 Guidelines on Decision Rules and Statements of Conformity available for download from https://ilac.org/publications-and-resources/ilac-guidance-series/ and refer to your accreditation body requirements. A good example of a guideline from an accreditation body is the UKAS Lab 48 Decision Rules and Statements of Conformity, available from hhttps://www.ukas.com/resources/publications/laboratory-accreditation/
1 - They've asked if there's any way they can be certified, considering they're already ISO 27001 certified. I've been researching the topic for a while and i've only seen this type of compliance statement being given to Cloud service providers.
Answer: First it is important to note that ISO 27017 is not a certifiable standard (some certification bodies "certify" against ISO 27017, but only during an ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 certification processes, because ISO 27001 and ISO 27701 are the only certifiable standards in the ISO 27000 series).
Considering that, to be "certified" against ISO 27017 all an organization needs to do is to include the applicable controls related to ISO 27017 in its Statement of Applicability (of course, as a result of performing the risk assessment and risk treatment process) and implement the risk treatment plan also considering the ISO 27017 controls.
These articles can provide further information:
- What is ISO 27001 https://advisera.com/27001academy/what-is-iso-27001/
- Relationship between ISO 27701, ISO 27001, and ISO 27002 https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2019/12/10/relationship-between-iso-27701-iso-27001-and-iso-27002/
- ISO 27001 vs. ISO 27017 – Information security controls for cloud services https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2015/11/30/iso-27001-vs-iso-27017-information-security-controls-for-cloud-services/
2 - I wanted to ask if you have seen this attestation being requested and given to any company that is only a cloud consumer.
Thank you in advance for your attention!
Answer: Please note that ISO 27017 also has controls applicable considering the point of view of the customer, so cloud consumers also can request to be “certified” as explained in the previous question.
Yes, you can reduce the number of sampling sites. It is recommended that you perform validation of that process, where you will analyze all data that you have collected so far and explain why is it justified to reduce the number of sampling sites.
For more information, please see the following link: