Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
For risk assessment you can consult these materials:
To see how documents for risk assessment compliant with ISO 7001 looks like, see: ISO 27001/ISO 22301 Risk Assessment Toolkit https://advisera.com/27001academy/iso-27001-22301-risk-assessment-toolkit/
For controls self-assessment, see:
The documents you are looking for which cover the mentioned clauses can be found in the following folders:
By the way, included in your toolkit there is a List of Documents file which points out which document covers which clauses and controls from these standards.
Attention, you are using correction and corrective action interchangeably. That is not right. First, you develop a correction to eliminate the nonconformity and its consequences. Then, if your organization decides to develop a corrective action, after determining the reason for the problem, the root cause(s), you have to implement a corrective action and, according to ISO 9001:2015 clause 10.2.1 d), you should review the effectiveness of the corrective action. So, you should state both criteria and a timeline to evaluate the effectiveness of the action.
Please check the following information:
According to requirement 7.5.6 Validation of processes for production and service provision, validation must be done for processes in which the resulting output cannot be verified by subsequent monitoring or measurement. It means that, for example, validation is not necessary when the mass of the medical device is in question, because you can weigh each product and check is the mass according to the specification. However, if you have a sterile product, it is not easy to check the sterility of the product. In that case, you need to dexterous the product and make an analysis of sterility. This is not convenient because you will destroy all your products and have a lot of costs. For such processes, validation must be performed.
Therefore, validation is documented evidence that declares a process or system will consistently meet a predetermined specification. It is a series of documented tests and gathered information that proves a system will produce a product that meets all specifications and standards.
Very often, there are standards that guide you on what has to be done to validate certain processes. Some of the most used standards for validations for medical devices are the following:
For more information about this topic, please see the following articles:
In terms of ISO 17025; Sampling (clause 7.3), Handling of Samples (clause 7.4) and Facilities and environmental conditions (clause 6.3) conditions must be met. Record keeping, including chain of custody records are crucial. The actual best practices will depend on the parameter to be tested, and your sector / regulations. All will, however, cover sampling, preservation, handling, transport and storage. The requirements for microbiological, chemical, toxicological and biological assays differ widely, and cannot unfortunately be detailed in this response. There are International and National standards available, as well as guidance from organisations such as WHO, EPA and FDA; that you can look at.
Have a look at the ISO International Classification for Standards (ICS) 13, for Environment, Health protection and Safety (https://www.iso.org/ics/13/x/) with 13.060 covering Water Quality (https://www.iso.org/ics/13.060/x/). Here, for example, you will find access to ISO 5667-3:2018 Water quality — Sampling — Part 3: Preservation and handling of water samples. For microbiology look at ISO 19458:2006 Water quality — Sampling for microbiological analysis.
For WHO, EPA and FDA guidelines, I suggest you got their websites and search, based on your specific criteria. For example https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P1000PUE.PDF?Dockey=P1000PUE.PDF provides the latest Supplement 1to the Fifth Edition of the Manual for the Certification of Laboratories Analyzing Drinking Water.
For more information on ISO 17025 requirements for Sampling (clause 7.3), Handling of Samples (clause 7.4) and Facilities and environmental conditions (clause 6.3), see the ISO 17025 toolkit at https://advisera.com/17025academy/iso-17025-documentation-toolkit/
Customer-specific requirement (CSR) is very important for the IATF 16949: 2016 standard. The standard requires customer-specific requirements (CSR) to be evaluated and adapted to the quality management system.
After reviewing the CSRs, it is also important to document an action plan about the issues you cannot comply with. This means that the CSR has been reviewed by the organization and there is awareness. Open actions should be completed as soon as possible.
For more information, see:
No, it will not be a reason for nonconformity during an external audit, unless it is something that the company does systematically. For example, in a year like 2020 with events like the coronavirus, it is natural that many objectives, depending on the context, are not attainable.
The following material will provide you more information:
Not all clauses are applicable in every area of an organization. I recommend starting from the process map. Organizations should develop a model based on the process approach. So, for each process study what are the applicable clauses from ISO 9001:2015 and what are the applicable internal documents. Please check these two free webinars on demand:
You can find more information below:
I'm assuming by your question that you are not considering certification, only compliance with the standard.
Considering that, to align the stated policies with ISO 27001 you need to:
To see how similar policies compliant with ISO 27001 looks like, please see:
These articles will provide you further information:
These materials will also help you regarding risk assessment and ISO 27001 Annex A controls: