For more about IATF 16949, I would recommend reading our blog posts on our IATF 16949 Blog that seem interesting to you and your business case in the production department: https://advisera.com/16949academy/blog/
Product recall requirements and Drinking water standard in Cambodia
Answer:
There is an ASEAN medical device directive where, in Article 12 and Annex 5, is described product recall process. You can find this directive on the following link: https://asean.org/book/asean-medical-device-directive/
Is it a viable statement to say that “Control of Work Transfers” is not applicable to our situation?"
Answer:
Transfer of work, as mentioned in clause 8.1, is referring to moving a process which is normally done in one place to another. As per the note it can be from your facility to a supplier, from one supplier to another, etc. In other words, it is in changing the original plan of where work will be done, and the requirements are that when you do this you have a process in place to ensure that the original conformity of the products or services is not maintained and risks are managed. When you are talking about sending a product out to be heat treated or plated as a regular function, this would fall under clause 8.4, Control of externally provided processes, products and services.
From your explanation it could be argued that this transfer of work is not applicable to you, but if you do choose to do this in the future you would need to plan the transfer and not just move work without assessing the risks.
Since the reason for this requirement is to ensure process validation is maintained when work is transferred, you can learn more on process validation in this article: What is process validation in AS9100 Rev D?, https://advisera.com/9100academy/blog/2017/10/02/what-is-process-validation-in-as9100-rev-d/
Statement of Applicability
We've received additional question:
>While I am waiting for your reply, I looked at the 27000 standard and para 6.1.3 C, D specifically requires to review all 114 control and include justification if we didn't use one. So does that mean that the declaration will include all the controls and for each ?
Answer:
Your assumption is correct. The Statement of Applicability must include all controls from Annex A, including justification for those considered applicable, their implementation status and the justification for those considered not applicable.
Risk assessment approach
I’m ready to purchase the BCMS templates, but since the RA Toolkit is a separate product, I want to make sure that I find the right RA solution before I move forward with the ISO 22301 Toolkit.
Could you please let me know if your experts have any suggestions on alternative RA solutions? Or if they think the RA Toolkit can be edited to focus on processes rather than assets?
Answer:
The Risk Assessment Table and the Risk Treatment Table from our Risk Assessment Toolkit are based on the asset-vulnerability-threat methodology, but the columns related to assets, vulnerabilities and threats can be changed by a single column describing the risks in a process based approach. All other elements can be kept.
Please note that risk management documents are included in the ISO 22301 Toolkit , and you can take a look how this change would look like by seeing the free demo of our ISO 22301 Toolkit at this link: https://advisera.com/27001academy/iso22301-documentation-toolkit/
This article will provide you further explanation about alternative risk assessment approaches:
In the toolkit there is a template for Incident log, located in folder 08 Annex A -Security Controls, subfolder A.16 Information Security Incident Management, defining which information must be recorded about information security incidents.
Regarding storage and management of such record, in the Incident Management Policy, located on the same folder, there is a section called "Managing records kept on the basis of this document", which defines the required information to record, store and manage about information related to information security incidents.
Please note that there are no other templates for records, and if you need a different record you will need to develop it based on guidelines from our procedure.
If we make recommendation to change the process and forms used for their procurement process, will this affect their ISO status and require more audit by the ISO Auditor?
Answer
No, changes made after an internal audit do not affect ISO status nor require more audits by the certification body, unless those changes are very profound. Let me add that I, as a certification body auditor, see very positively a quality management system where changes are made after internal audits. For me that is a sign of a caring organization and caring internal auditor team.
ISO 27001 Internal Auditor is someone with competence to audit an ISMS against ISO 27001 so he/she can perform audits for his/her organization, while the ISO 27001 Lead Auditor is someone who has competency on auditing an ISMS against ISO 27001 requirements and is qualified to become a certification auditor (i.e., capable to work for a certification body).