Answer:
Every issue included in the SWOT matrix can be used to determine risks and opportunities.
Consider, as an example, a small sample of a SWOT matrix of an organization
Remember the ISO 9000:2015 definition of risk - risk as the effect of uncertainty. And then, in a note, the standard states that an effect is a deviation from the expected – positive or negative.
So, consider an overall desired outcome for the quality management system, an expected result: Win more sales from new customers.
Risks will work against meeting that expected a result. Opportunities will work helping in meeting that expected a result.
The organization can match the Opportunity with the Strength at the SWOT matrix above, and raise an opportunity:
Win new customers that were served by the now-closed competitor making use of our fast sampling skills; htt ps://
The organization can match the Threat with the Weakness at the SWOT matrix above, and raise a risk:
Economically weaker subcontractor could no longer be profitable and close without orders from the now-closed competitor. Our orders alone don’t sustain him. Without that subcontractor capacity, we can win orders that we cannot serve due to our assembling capacity shortage
How to identify aspects & impacts department wise. e.g Quality, Purchase, assembly, store etc.
It will be good if you explain through example.”
Answer:
When working with an organization, during the environmental assessment of aspects and impacts I use two ways:
Check the processes; and
Check the locations.
By checking the process, I mean: draw a flowchart of what is being done and start to list aspects first and then potential impacts. To list potential impacts, one has to walk and visit the shop floor because impacts depend on the real situation.
By checking the location, I mean: walk through the installation, walk through the facilities and see what the present condition is, and if there is any situation, independent of processes that can be related with aspects and impacts.
For example, I’m implementing a management system in a company that builds steel structures. An initial flowchart allowed us to draw this first list of aspects.https://
When I went to their warehouse, I saw that there was a leaking water tap, that there were several liquids in drums without prevention against leaks and spills, I saw that different kinds of wastes were being mixed together.
The Risk Treatment Plan and the Implementation Plan
Answer:
First we apologize for the confusion.
The Risk Treatment Plan and the Implementation Plan are the same thing.
The "Risk Treatment Plan" template on section 10 is more related to the "do" phase of the project, when you are in fact implementing the controls, while the Risk Assessment and Risk Treatment process, which documents are described on section 7 are related to the "planning"phase of the project. That's why these documents are on separated sections.
In your scenario, the RTO refers to the time required to resume an application operation, while the RPO refers to the acceptable data loss on a database.
Considering that, you can establish a single pair of RTO and RPO for the most critical applications and databases in your BIA, and from those you can derive other RTO's and RPO's for specific application and database when needed. For example you can set a RTO of 4h for an application and a RPO of 1 day for a database from your most critical activities, but you can identify that for other activities you can define a RTO of 1 day for applications and a RPO of 5 days for databases. This way you can optimize your resources, allocating them where they are more needed to recover from a disruptive event.
Some examples of possible events that may happen in a Intensive Care Unit are:
- Failure in ventilator´s alarm
- A patient falls from the bed
- Not following correctly hand washing procedures
Many causes can be associated to the above risks, for instance nursing failure due to fatigue, patient´s sensibility or equipment malfunctioning.
My recommendation is to conduct a FMEA analysis , a technique carried out to better identify and reduce errors. It is a systematic tool used to define, detect, prevent, eliminate or control failures, causes and effects of potential errors.
The GDPR requires controllers only to engage processors that are able to ensure that the personal data passed to them is processed in a secure and lawful manner.
The questionnaire you are asking about is meant to provide some basic information to controllers on the way in which potential or existing processors are handling personal data. So, you can use it as a part of your due diligence process for new processors or you can use it to check on your current processors.
For a small change on the SoA you only have to keep the evidences that the impact of the changes was evaluated (e.g., by means of an additional management review) and that the required changes on implemented controls were properly planned and implemented. These evidences must be presented on the next surveillance audit.
For big changes on SoA, we recommend you to contact your certification body so it can evaluate if an extra surveillance audit is necessary, or if the certification auditor can leave this verification for the scheduled surveillance audit.
I'm assuming you are referring to ISO 27001. Considering that, assets are classified based on the information they store, transmit or process, which in turn are classified in terms of legal requirements, value to the organization, criticality and sensitivity to unauthorized disclosure or modification.
For example, a storage unit which stores public and confidential information must be classified as confidential, because this is the highest classification of information it handles.