Answer:
There are no specific ISO 45001 requirements for the design process, however, like all other processes within your company you would need to assess the hazards and risks that are present in the design processes just as you would for any other process. This is true of many other requirements such as assessing legal requirement, etc.
For a better understanding of the ISO45001:2018 clauses, see this whitepaper: Clause-by-clause explanation of ISO 45001:2018, https://info.advisera.com/45001academy/free-download/clause-by-clause-explanation-of-iso-45001
AS9100 Equipment for reference measurement
Answer:
Clause 7.1.5.2 on measurement traceability requires calibration for any equipment that is essential to providing confidence of the validity of measurement results, or in other words measuring equipment used to make official measurements. If the tools you are speaking of are used to make the final measurements that are ensuring final validation measurement on a product then they would need to be calibrated. If they are only reference measurements to ensure that future official measurements are correct then deeming them as calibration not required would not be against AS9100 requirements.
For a better understanding of the AS9100 Rev D clauses, see this whitepaper: Clause-by-clause explanation of AS9100 Rev D, https://info.advisera.com/9100academy/free-download/clause-by-clause-explanation-of-as9100-rev-d
Answer:
With the 2015 versions, either ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 no longer require or mention the role of a Management Representative (MR). Being so, organizations wanting to keep these functions are free to consider the best option for their own case.
Answer:
You can determine risks related with: the compliance obligations you will have identified as relevant to your EMS and business; the environmental aspects you have identified for your EMS; and the stakeholders and interested parties identified when you considered the scope and context of the organization on establishment and review of your EMS. For each determined risk you should evaluate if there is the need for taking action. That means, you should evaluate if the risk is critical. Each organization should define its own way of evaluating environmental risks. For example, an organization can set as evaluating parameters: probability of risk occurrence and impact of risk occurrence. Each parameter can be evaluated as LOW, MEDIUM or HIGH and set a matrix like the following one:
“In clause 9.1.2 evaluation of compliance the returns submitted as per compliance register is to be checked in auditing EMS. Please explain.”
Answ er:
While auditing an EMS, evaluation of compliance according to clause 9.1.2 of ISO 14001:2015, is audited. As an audit, a sample will be taken and verified by the auditors. The implementation of clause 9.1.2 must ensure that all items included in the compliance register are verified. Once audits work with samples, audits cannot be used to perform evaluation of compliance according to clause 9.1.2.
You should submit one report of this product if the all the 200 individually wrapped product belongs to a single lot . You should also refer to your local regulatory guideline for clarification.
Deviation from requirements for batch identification
What I mean is: what will happen in an audit if the batch codification does not accomplish the requirements?
can you help me with this?
Answer:
During an audit, when there is a finding, the auditor would first want to know look at your documented procedure and followed by checking with you whether any appropriate justification can be provided for the deviation.
In the case of a minor deviation from the requirement, they would want to know whether any correction has been taken and documented in the form of CAPA. If this has been addressed appropriately, the auditor would likely put it as an observation.
In the case where no corrections are taken, the auditor would require a justification as to why no actions are being taken. A non conformity will be raised in which the auditee would be given a reasonable period of time to perform the corrections.
Answer:
Every issue included in the SWOT matrix can be used to determine risks and opportunities.
Consider, as an example, a small sample of a SWOT matrix of an organization
Remember the ISO 9000:2015 definition of risk - risk as the effect of uncertainty. And then, in a note, the standard states that an effect is a deviation from the expected – positive or negative.
So, consider an overall desired outcome for the quality management system, an expected result: Win more sales from new customers.
Risks will work against meeting that expected a result. Opportunities will work helping in meeting that expected a result.
The organization can match the Opportunity with the Strength at the SWOT matrix above, and raise an opportunity:
Win new customers that were served by the now-closed competitor making use of our fast sampling skills; htt ps://
The organization can match the Threat with the Weakness at the SWOT matrix above, and raise a risk:
Economically weaker subcontractor could no longer be profitable and close without orders from the now-closed competitor. Our orders alone don’t sustain him. Without that subcontractor capacity, we can win orders that we cannot serve due to our assembling capacity shortage
How to identify aspects & impacts department wise. e.g Quality, Purchase, assembly, store etc.
It will be good if you explain through example.”
Answer:
When working with an organization, during the environmental assessment of aspects and impacts I use two ways:
Check the processes; and
Check the locations.
By checking the process, I mean: draw a flowchart of what is being done and start to list aspects first and then potential impacts. To list potential impacts, one has to walk and visit the shop floor because impacts depend on the real situation.
By checking the location, I mean: walk through the installation, walk through the facilities and see what the present condition is, and if there is any situation, independent of processes that can be related with aspects and impacts.
For example, I’m implementing a management system in a company that builds steel structures. An initial flowchart allowed us to draw this first list of aspects.https://
When I went to their warehouse, I saw that there was a leaking water tap, that there were several liquids in drums without prevention against leaks and spills, I saw that different kinds of wastes were being mixed together.