Answer: ISO 27001 does not require you to assess assets, but it does require you to assess likelihood and impact of a risk. When the impact of a risk is assessed, you have to take into account the effects of this risk on the confidentialiy, integrity and availability of your data.
Q2: Does the RTP have to cover all risks identified against each of the controls or only high/medium risks identified from your risk assessment performed against the companies assets?
Answer: The Risk Treatment Plan (RTP) has to cover only the controls that have not yet been implemented - it doesn't matter to which assets or risks those controls are related to. The risk treatment process has a differentu purpose than the RTP - it has to cover only the unacceptable risks, i.e. the highest risks you identified during the risk assessment process.
The development of business continuity plans often requires the involvement of several persons, because the plan has to consider multiple views such as business, operation, financial, etc. Since these people normally have low experience on developing BCPs, it is the role of the BC manager / implementer to coordinate their efforts, guiding them on the identification of needed information and resources, defining objectives and activation/deactivation conditions, etc. On some cases, after gathering all the information, they can elaborate the part of the plan that involves the activities they will be involved with, while you can write the parts more related to the Business Continuity Management System (e.g., communication plan).
ISO 9001:2015 doesn´t state or require anything on how organizations should name the different documents, so then it will be up to the company how to do it. As you mention in your consultation, usually companies use the following documentation structure:
- level 1 - Quality Manual
- level 2 - Quality Policy
- level 3 - Procedures
- level 4 - Instructions
- level 5 - Records
When it comes to risk treatment, there are four general options: mitigate, avoid, transfer and accept. So, in a sense, even raw risks can be considered residual risks (when the chosen treatment for them is to accept the risk).
NIST 800-171, Aerospace standards, CIS 20, NIST 800-53 with ISO 27001 Standards
Answer:
NIST 800-171, NIST 800-53, and CIS 20 (Center for Internet Security) provide detailed information for implementation of some controls related to ISO 27001 Annex A, so to integrate these controls to ISO 27001 you have to map the relationship between them. NIST documents already have annexes that identify these relations (NIST 800-171 Annex D and NIST 800-53 Anex H). Unfortunately we are not experts on CIS 20 to inform you have such relations already been mapped.
Regarding Aerospace standards, without details about which one you are referring to, we are unable to provide a proper answer.
Usually internal auditors are consultants, professionals with experience and enough knowledge implementing and maintaning management systems. You can work for a company as a consultant where usually part of job is conducting internal audits, or if you have enough experience, work as a freelancer providing consulting services such as internal audits. In this latest case you will need to develop a contact network in order to gain new clients and advertise your services in specialized websites.
The best approach is to develop a checklist of which items you need to verify, and which results you have to find to define if there is a gap or not. Based on that approach it is easier to develop action plans to eliminate the gaps.
It was developed as a simple question-and-answer questionnaire so you can visualize which specific elements of an information security management system are already implemented, and what is still needed to do.
Ambas cláusulas, la cláusula 4.2 que versa sobre entender las necesidades y expectativas de las partes interesadas y la cláusula 6.1, sobre acciones para abordar los riesgos y las oportunidades son realmente cruciales en la implementación de la norma ISO 9001:2015. Informar a la alta dirección de forma clara ambas cláusulas, su importancia para que la implementación se realice con éxito, así como la relevancia de sus responsabilidades en estos dos procesos ayudará a la gerencia a concienciarse sobre estos puntos.
Para concienciar a la gerencia sobre el proceso de implementación de la norma pueden emplearse una serie de indicadores para demostrar que el SGC también es cuantificable, eligiendo aquellos indicadores que más importan a la dirección como son los gastos o las incidencias. Esto es especialmente evidente en actividades dentro de una organización como mantenimiento de equipos, seguimiento de procesos de fabricación, análisis de caus as de no conformidades, etc.
Que la alta dirección sea plenamente consciente de los beneficios de un sistema de gestión es fundamental pata que se traslade a los empleados, que lo verán de la misma forma.
The main points here are to focus on business benefits, low costs and quick wins.
To resume a poorly implemented ISMS, or convince management to implement security practices without external enforcement, you should focus on solving problems your areas are currently undergoing (e.g., low performance on KPIs, unplanned downtime, rework, non compliance fines, missed deadlines, etc.), by means of quick implementation of controls based on solid risk assessments (and less focus on the other elements of the management system).
It may seem odd to start like this, but the point is to try to gain/regain top management commitment and people's trust in information security (few but effective controls will help you with that), and only after achieving that you should try to demonstrate that in the long run the gains can only be maintained with the help of the other elements of the management system (e.g., in internal audit, management review).
Risk assessment should be monitored against recorded events, incidents and non-compliances, processes performance results, and changes on the context of the organization.
All these inputs can show trends on risks that may require risks on the risk assessment to be adjusted to fix it, either by means of including/excluding risks, changing probability and/or impact values of existent risks, or by changing the treatment or controls for those risks.
These inputs are often considered during periodic process performance evaluation or during management review.
This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember you. We use this information in order to improve and customize your browsing experience and for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy.
If you decline, your information won't be tracked when you visit this website. A single cookie will be used in your browser to remember your preference not to be tracked.