Answer: Since their publication, ISO 27017 and ISO 27018 have not been reviewed or updated (by means of corrigenda), so any information regarding them in our knowledge base is still updated.
Regarding ISO 27001, two updates have already been published through corrigenda, one in 2014 and the other in 2015, but they refer to minor corrections on the standard that do not affect ISMS based on this standard, or its relation with ISO 27017 or ISO 27018.
(1) Please check clause 6.1.1 – it is there that the standard establishes that organizations should determine risks and opportunities associated with environmental aspects. See also the note at the end of clause 6.1.2 and the annex A.6.1.1
(2) No. Please check annex A.8.1, first paragraph. That will depend on the risks and opportunities, significant environmental aspects and compliance obligations. For example, if you have non-significant environmental aspects without associated compliance obligations there is no need for operational control.
The following material will provide you information about operational control:
2. We have mapped all data our organisation processes. They fall into several categories (members, stakeholders, prospects, etc.) and the legal basis used to process data can be different in accordance (legitimate interest, contractual necessity, etc.). The description of the legitimate interest can also differ within the same group, according to the type of stakeholder approached. My question is the following: can we send out specific - and therefore different - privacy notices to data subjects according to their characteristics (legal basis used, reasons for processing), or do we need to have only one publicly available privacy notice that would consider every situation where we process data?
Answers:
1. The EU GDPR is applicable to your processing activity as long as the processing acti vity takes place in the Union regardless if the data subjects are in the Union or not.
2. Regarding your privacy notices, you can bundle them for similar processing activities even if for example the legal basis would be different.
Answer: There is no experience requirement to attend an ISO 27001 lead auditor course (although previous experience will help you in some aspects). The experience is only required if you want to become a lead auditor working as a certification auditor.
Answer: CISA and Lead Auditor cover different fields (information on systems are only a small intersection between them), so does not make much sense to compare demands between them. Your choice between them should be based on the type and depth of the activities you desire to perform. If your want to focus on information security management, you should consider ISO 27001 Lead Auditor. If you want to go beyond the scope of information security, and also consider the strategic relationships between information security and the information systems and business objectives you should consider CISA. Please note that these courses do not exclude each other, they only offer different perspectives about how information interacts with business.
Another alternative you should consider is the Lead Implementer course.
Respuesta: Disculpa, pero no estoy seguro si he entendido bien tu pregunta, porque la lógica de la ISO 27001 es identificar riesgos, y tratarlos, implementando los controles de seguridad que sean necesarios. Por tanto, básicamente los controles que pueden no ser obligatorios son aquellos que no necesitas para tratar los riesgos identificados, por ejemplo porque no son aplicables. Por ejemplo, si en tu organización no exise el teletrabajo, el control relacionado con el teletrabajo no será aplicable, y por tanto no será obligatorio implementarlo. Este artículo te puede resultar interesante “La lógica básica de ISO 27001: ¿cómo funciona la seguridad de la información?” https://advisera.com/27001academy/es/knowledgebase/la-logica-basica-de-iso-27001-como-funciona-la-seguridad-de-la-informacion/
To what extent should we use Annex 2 of the Cross-Border Data Processing Procedure for:
- the application of visas for countries such as America, India, China, etc.? Consulates will not be prepared to sign Annex 2.
- the reservation of hotels, renting cars in e.g. the above-mentioned countries?
Answer:
1. If you apply for visas you don`t need to have a data transfer mechanism in place as the transfer of data is regulated via International Agreements between countries.
2. If the data subject does that directly there is no need for such data transfer agreement. However, if a company in the EEA would be passing personal data to a car rental company outside the EEA a data transfer agreement would be needed between the two entities.
Yes, they were. Before ISO 9001:2000 there were three quality assurance standards: ISO 9001 for a company with design, commercial and production in the scope, ISO 9002 or a company with for a company with commercial and production in the scope, and 9003 basically for a company without neither design nor production, just commercial activity.
The following material will provide you information about standards history:
I recommend you concentrate on the areas with the most important changes in the 14001:2015 version. Particularly risks and opportunities; context of the organization, interested parties and the life cycle consideration during the identification of environmental aspects.