Since ISO 9001:2015 has no mandatory requirements about retaining documented information about risks and opportunities we are free to decide how to do it.
Working with organizations, I recommend using a Risk and Opportunities Register where we centralize all risks and opportunities determined (related with products and services, related with quality objectives and with management system’s processes), their evaluation (for example about probability and severity), the decision about doing something or not, and an overall description of what will be done (when applicable)
The following material will provide you information about the risk-based approach:
No, certification audits are not free. You can check if in your country your government has any program in place to help with the costs of certification, because that happens in some countries.
The following material will provide you information about certification costs:
Yes, you still need to do an internal audit. Internal audits and gap analysis are different things and have different purposes. A gap analysis identifies what is missing when it is supposed that something is missing. An internal audit is performed on a process that is supposed to be already operating according to the audit criteria. There is a before and after the gap analysis, there is no assurance that the changes needed were implemented and effective.
Normally, the Quality Policy is included in the Quality Manual. Nevertheless, the Quality Policy should be, also, a stand-alone document if there are employees that have no access to the Quality Manual. Normally, the Quality Objectives are not included in the Quality Manual because they can change every year. There are no requirements against including them in the Quality Manual it is just the practical side of having to change it frequently that stops most of the people of doing it.
The following material will provide you information about the Quality Manual:
Yes, environmental audit and environmental monitoring and evaluation are different things, although both are used to evaluate performance. An environmental audit is a systematic process of obtaining evidences to determine if audit criteria are fulfilled. For example; are procedures being followed, are desired results being attained? Audits are done by auditors, they check documentation, they observe, they ask questions to people doing the jobs. Environmental monitoring is about determining the status of a process or system, comparing actual results with desired results, the specifications, and after evaluation deciding if anything should be done. For example, independently of what is being done an organization can monitor the amount of solid wastes that generates, or the quality of its air emissions.
The following material will provide you information about monitoring and auditing:
To define samples for a BCMS internal audit you should consider:
- contracts and regulations you must comply with (policies and procedures related to the most critical or most frequent requirements should be sampled)
- the results of business impact assessment (policies and procedures related to the most critical elements identified in the BIA should be sampled)
- Business continuity plans and related records
Lack of information in non-conformance description
Answer:
Any non-conformance issued during an audit should include the clause that is not being respected. If I received a non-conformance during a surveillance audit, I would contact the certification body and politely ask them to identify the clause being violated or asking them if my interpretation of what clause is not being respected is was correct.
The following material will provide you information about the non-conformances issued during audits:
The EU GDPR states that the consent should be “a freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous indication of the individual’s wishes’ this means that consent must consist of a clear affirmative action. Inactivity or silence is not enough and the use of “pre-ticked boxes” is not permitted.
However, the use of cookies is regulated by the ePrivacy Directive which s tates that you only need to inform the visitors about the cookies you are using not obtaining their consent but this also depends on the types of cookies you are using as well as the personal data collected and the purposes for which is used.
First is important to note that information flow is not mentioned in the whole ISO 27001 standard.
Regarding risk assessment, the information flow is only one of the inputs used to understand the context on which the risk assessment will be performed. So you still have to define an approach to the risk assessment process, and for information security risk assessment the asset-based risk assessment is still one of the most common approaches.
Answer: If you need a procedure for monitoring information processing servers, I suggest you to take a look at the free demo of our Operating Procedures for Information and Communication Technology template to see if it can fulfill your needs. You can access the demo at this link: https://advisera.com/27001academy/documentation/security-procedures-for-it-department/
Regarding Code of Ethics, the requirements of ISO 27001 do not require such document.
This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember you. We use this information in order to improve and customize your browsing experience and for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy.
If you decline, your information won't be tracked when you visit this website. A single cookie will be used in your browser to remember your preference not to be tracked.