I am thinking whether I can approach the Cybersecurity in a risk management framework , from risk management strategy to identify and access the risk , build Cybersecurity program and security assurance architecture , mitigate the risk from Cybersecurity plan with security control in ISO 27001 Annex A against the control category in NIST CSF which comply with NERC CIP 02-09.
and since the correlation between NIST CSF and NERC CIP is already mapped, the integration between these three would follow the same logic.
Risks on software development
Answer: The specific risks perceived by an organization regarding its processes (e.g., software development) and provided services (e.g., CRAM software on a SaaS environment) are unique considering its organizational context and objectives, and should be supported by a risk assessment process, but broadly speaking you should consider these references:
- Top Threats to Cloud Computing Plus: Industry Insights https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/download/top-threats-cloud-computing-plus-industry-insights/
- OWASP Top Ten 2017 Project https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10-2017_Top_10
Respuesta: Los indicadores son muy importantes porque puedes usarlos para medir y monitorizar los procesos y los controles de seguridad de la información, que es un requerimiento en la ISO 27001, de acuerdo al punto 9.1 Seguimiento, medición, análisis y evaluación.
Consider auditing a process – what ISO 9001:2015 clauses do you consider?
Auditing process performance (9.1.1 and 9.1.3);
Auditing process control (8.5.1);
Auditing quality control (8.6);
Auditing nonconformities control (8.7);
Auditing order control (8.4)
Auditing documentation control (7.5)
Auditing monitoring resources (7.1.5)
Auditing identification and traceability (8.5.2)
As you can see, you can use several ISO 9001 clauses to audit a process, outsourced or not.
The following material will provide you information about scope definition:
All the data subject requests including the “right to be forgotten request” would be dealt with according to the “Data Subject Access Request Procedure”.
In ISO world, mandatory requirements/documents are related to the words "must" or "shall", while non mandatory requirements/documents are related to words "may"or "should". In ISO 27002, since it provides recommendations for the implementation of controls that may be required as a result of a risk assessment, you will find the guidance ruled by "should", i.e., you only have to consider the recommendations that will help handle the risks you identified as unacceptable.
From your perspective, is it possible to take only the exam for ISO23001 lead auditor and not do once again the training? Is it something your company is offering?
Answer: The ISO 22301 Lead Auditor exam is the final part of the ISO 22301 Lead Auditor course, so you cannot take the exam without attending the course, unless you are taking a second exam after failing the first one in the allowed time interval.
Besides that, the content about audit methodologies and techniques are only part of the course. You will be presented to ISO 22301 concepts and requirements, as well as the exercises developed during the course are different.
At this moment we are not providing the ISO 22301 Lead Auditor course.