Answer: Considering your interest in information security, ISO 27001 certification will be of great help to your career, because not only it presents a systematic way to implement, operate and improve an information security management system, but it is also a world-wide recognized and accepted standard, which will allow you to work in any part of the world.
2 - Which should be pursued first LI/LA as per my case? I have shortlisted onto 3 certification bodies nearer to my place here in New Delhi(India) i.e. PECB / BSI / SGS. PECB is the most expensive and SGS as the least expensive.
Answer: Let's start with the differences:
- ISO 27001 Lead Implementer – this certification recognizes people who have competency on the ISO 27001 implementation process.
- ISO 27001 Lead Auditor – this certification recognizes people who have competency on auditing an ISMS against ISO 27001 requirements and want to become certification auditor (and with this provides more confidence to an organization for being certified).
Considering your stated background, the decision about which one to take will depend on your professional purposes. If you plan to work on the implementation of information Security Management Systems, then you should consider the Lead Implementer certification. If you plan to work on certifying ISMSs, or to ensure implemented ISMSs are complaint with ISO 27001 requirements, then you should consider the Lead Auditor certification.
Regarding certification bodies, world-wide recognized LI/LA courses (also known as accredited courses), which are the first step to LI/LA certification, need to be compliant with ISO 17024 (General requirements for bodies operating certification schemes for persons), which helps ensure that even with different approaches their courses can provide confidence in the skills acquired by the people who pass their exams (PECB, BSI and SGS have accredited courses), so good criteria to select your training provider, besides cost, are the certification body reputation in your country and references from previous students (you may find these on professional social networks like LinkedIn).
For the internal audit there are no specific mandatory documents besides those included in the standard and that should have been introduced with the implementation.
The following material will provide you information about mandatory documents:
Unless you want to store the data locally there is not much you can do. As long as Dropbox keeps its end of the deal to keep the personal data safe you should be fine.
Don`t forget to mention in your privacy notice(s) the fact that you are using a third party to store personal data.
2) Do we have to review our Terms and Conditions as well? Or is the privacy notice along with our Terms and conditions enough?
Answers:
For your existing users notifying them would be enough. Basically, the notice is an informative document to let know the data subjects what personal data you use when they are using your platform so if they don`t agree they can choose not to use it.
Depends what is written in the Terms and Conditions. If they refer only to what the customers are allowed to do on the platform and what their liabilities are most likely you don’t need to review them. However, if you have references to data protection matters then you should remove those and only have them separate in your Privacy Notice.
The template can work for website privacy notices as well. Just bear in mind that the website privacy notice may be different than other privacy notices if you collect other personal data such as IPs for example. You can have different privacy notices for different processing activities such as or your customers, website visitors, employees, etc.
Document controlling is what clause 7.5 of ISO 9001:2015 speaks about when it mentions documented information.
Clause 7.5.2 is about document creation – you want clear documents, consistent format and authorized approval and review
Clause 7.5.3.1 is about how to assure access to the documents to those that need to use them and how to protect them from loss of integrity and misuse
Clause 7.5.3.2 is about versions change control and about controlling records
The following material will provide you information about documented information:
Yes, you are. Objectivity is an important issue when we speak about audits. Do not forget other issues like training about the standard and training about internal audits.
The following material will provide you information about the internal audits:
Considering your strategic orientation your organization will determine relevant internal and external issues.
As an example of internal issues, you can have:
Quality problems;
Low productivity;
Delay problems;
New subcontractor.
As an example of external issues, you can have:
Raw materials price evolution;
New legislation that will affect what your customers, or your customers’ customers will buy;
New technology that will affect how you manufacture, or how you sell;
New consumer trends that will affect demand quality and volume.
With this kind of issues in stake, we can look at them also as uncertainty generators. And risk is the effect of uncertainty on expected results.
Quality problems, low productivity and delays can be viewed as the manifestation of risks. If your organization want to reduce the probability or frequency of those risks one good way to accomplish that is to change, to improve the processes where those risks are generated
New consumer trends are an external issue that can be viewed as a risk, or an opportunity, perhaps your organization can focus production on a particular category where demand is increasing, and you have a competitive advantage. Do you need to make changes in the production? Or in the commercial approach to the market? Do you need changes in how to buy, or whom to subcontract?
The following material will provide you information about the context and risks:
I'm understanding that in your context the P.A.R./C.A.R. is considered relevant and/or mandatory to be used, regardless of the ISO 27001 requirements.
If this is the case, then you can use the PAR to handle the implementation of the controls (it will be your Risk Treatment Plan).
The CAR can be used to handle security incidents or non conformances identified in audits, but not security threats (if the threat did not occur you should use the PAR).
Again it is important to note that CAR and PAR documents are not required by ISO 27001 and this approach works as a mean to integrate ISO 27001 practices to your working framework.
This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember you. We use this information in order to improve and customize your browsing experience and for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy.
If you decline, your information won't be tracked when you visit this website. A single cookie will be used in your browser to remember your preference not to be tracked.