Or is there need for extending the questionnaire?
Can you help me with putting an sample example of one process in the DPIA register?
Answers:
The DPIA register is meant to be use as a tool to asses the risks related to a processing activity. Based on EU GDPR art. 35 – “Data protection impact assessment” ( https://advisera.com/eugdpracademy/gdpr/data-protection-impact-assessment/) the need to perform a DPIA is assessed by the controller and this first assessment is done through the first 5 questions in the DPIA register.
The questions within the DPIA register are consistent with the EU GDPR requirements but there is nothing keeping you in adding additional questions and to customize the document for your needs.
US is out of the question, Canada however because is one of the countries which was issued an adequacy decision may very well make some changes to its data protection legislation to match with the requirements of the EU GDPR.
Other countries such as Switzerland also announced that they will try to mirror the requirements of the EU GDPR in their own local laws.
I know too several variations of that acronym. There is no need for a leading authority, your organization is free to decide which variation suits best. Really important is taking care of clause 6.2.1 when defining quality objectives.
The following material will provide you information about Good Quality Objectives:
The standard gives some examples about what can be considered as format. Language – if your organization is present in several countries you have to handle the language issue.
Software version – Will all users have access to the software for consulting?
Graphics – Will all procedures have the same graphic look? Will all work instructions have the same graphic look? Will all forms have the same graphic look?
The following material will provide you information about the documented information:
1. Government Ministries
2. Small, Medium and Large business places.
Answer: The selection of an ISO standards depends on many factors, such as:
- Laws and regulations that must be followed
- Business (private or governmental) that must be achieved
- Customers / Users needs to be fulfilled
So, without more detailed information it is not possible to recommend specific ISO standards.
But it is important to note that ISO standards are designed to be implemented by organizations of any sector or size.
Answer: Besides a customer requirement, you also have to evaluate these two aspects:
- if there is any legal requirement such as laws or regulations that demands for this certification;
- if the benefits related to the ISO 20000 certification will be greater than the effort to implement it and maintained it.
If there is no applicable legal requirement, then you should consider if the benefits for your organization to certify against ISO 20000 to meet this client needs will be greater than effort and cost involved in the implementation and operation of a certified system.
2. Do we have separate documents or record for each or combined, eg Internal audit program and Audit reports. Can non- conformities discovered in 9001, 14001 and 45001 be recorded in a single template.”
Answer:
The most logical approach for an integrated management system is a common policy and whenever possible common documents like internal audit, audit report, corrective actions, and so on. Your organization can try a single template for non-conformities. In working with some organizations I have used a single template and worked, but I must confess that sometimes it does not work because some organizations want to keep simple templates and trying to answer to all standards and recording what is relevant about the context of the non-conformity is not easy.
The following material will provide you information about management systems integration:
If there is no QMS defined yet perhaps at this stage a Gap Analysis will more useful. Please check the links bellow where you can find a free checklist for a Gap Analysis and where Gap Analysis is compared with audits.
The following material will provide you information about the Gap Analysis tool:
Answer: First it is important to note that ISO 27001 does not prescribe any specific methodology for an ISMS, so organizations are free to choose the methodology that best fits their needs.
The most used approach is the asset-based risk assessment. Regarding FMEA, it is a good approach when you have a clear understanding of the processes being assessed.
This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember you. We use this information in order to improve and customize your browsing experience and for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy.
If you decline, your information won't be tracked when you visit this website. A single cookie will be used in your browser to remember your preference not to be tracked.