Hello. Thank you. I have another question. The auditor for ISO 14001 2015 asked us if we take into consideration sustainable materials when we buy packaging products. My question is is sustainable materials part of the ISO 14001 2015 audit? unless we consider it a big environmental aspect. Please advise. Thanks.
Maria
New Quality Processes
I would use a “master list” of all “how we do it” procedures: with their name, current version, where they are used and the owner for approval of changes
Inventory of assets
Regarding ISO 27001, the inventory of assets must consider only assets associated with information and information processing facilities, including fixed assets like safes, shredders and others, so you can leave non related furniture and fixed assets out of this inventory.
New question:
"Thanks for this information – You’ve answered my Question.
I’ve asked this question as Company 1 is the Head Office and they do the design – Thus Holding the ISO Certificate for Design & Development– Company B is the Sister company which only does repairs and they claim they are not doing design but my argument was that they are redesigning the Original Design down to something else therefore their ISO Certificate should include design even if they use the design engineers at company A but documented Information must be in place.
Do you agree?"
My answer:
If Company B only does repairs, repairs are not considered design. Perhaps one should clarify the meaning of “repairs”, presently I’m working with a company that sell new machines, buy used machines from customers, if both parts agree, and then they repair them and sometimes do changes because, for example, new safety requirements, better components, to sell them as second-hand machines. In tha t case design is a must!
Another important point is: who is ordering the design changes? If they do the design changes but the order with the indications come from Company 1, design is not an issue for Company B.
Controls in third party facility
We received this question:
>I have a further question. Some of the properties and free, public and we do not have a contract. How will this impact your suggestion?
Answer: Without a contract you will not have any support to enforce the properties responsible to implement the security controls you require, and you will be at risk of being legally processed for modifying the facilities to implement the controls by yourself without authorization.
Risk treatment plan
Answer: The Risk Treatment Plan must include actions only to:
- treat risks evaluated as unacceptable (as result of risk assessment)
- improve the performance of already existing controls (based on a top management decision)
Answer: The performing of vulnerability scanning or penetration testing, either by the organization itself or by a 3rd party, are options to be considered only if the control A.18.2.3 (Technical compliance review) is considered applicable as result of risk assessment or because of a top management decision. It is important to understand that vulnerability scanning or penetration testing are only options. If other means, like manual reviews, can fulfill your needs, the performing of vulnerability scanning or penetration testing are not necessary.
Yes! If your organization has not yet performed an internal audit and a management review certification auditors cannot verify that your organization complies with all ISO 9001 requirements.
The following material will provide you information about internal audits:
Answer: For ISO the main standard for business continuity management is the ISO 22301, which defines the requirements for the business continuity management system. For complementary guidance and recommendations there are supporting standards such as ISO 22313 and ISO 27031 (Guidelines for information and communication technology readiness for business continuity)
Other organizations have their own standards that an organization should consider according to its own context, like National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and its NFPA 1600
2- The requirements state what SHOULD be done and not HOW to do it right?
Answer: Your assumption is partially correct. ISO 22301, like other ISO management standards, has mandatory requirements (associated to the words must/shall) and also optional requirements (associated to the words may/should), and these only define what must/should be done, and not how. This is like this way to allow each organization to freely define how to implement the requirements.