Sí, estoy de acuerdo contigo Marcelo. Tú podrías ser el propietario, desarrollando/adaptando los documentos, el miembro del consejo de administración los puede revisar, y gerencia puede aprobarlos.
Referring to the situation you described, if the parents are the ones filling in the details for their own children then they are actually acting on the children's behalf so no additional consent would be required.
Understanding ISO 27001
Is my fear true?
Answer: ISO 27001 is a management standard, so most of its requirements are about roles and responsibilities, and how process should be planned, implemented, controlled and improved, with only minimal requirements regarding technical issues like networking and penetration testing (basically what someone in management position should require from his technical staff). So a non technical education wouldn't be a problem to learn ISO 27001.
Answer:
If Incident was submitted as Service Request (or vice versa) it should be re-routed right at the beginning i.e. before further activities take place. This means that, usually Service Desk staff or technician who took over the ticket, should change Incident into Service Request (or vice versa) and "send" it to the right process.
What I understood, having a separate switch/network is not an option right now. Do you have any suggestions on what we can do to minimize or eliminate this risk?
Answer: If you do not have access to the switch and having a separate switch/network is not an option at the moment, your options are very limited.
If you want to treat the risk you could try to:
- Implement cryptography to protect communication between the computers in your network and to protect you files.
- Implement access control into the shared folders in your network.
- Make an agreement with company that controls the switch and specifying the security controls they need to implement.
Other alternatives in terms of risk management are accept the risk (and do nothing), and avoid the risk (e.g., by stopping using the switch).
Answer: The Management Representative is not a required role in the ISMS by ISO 27001, but an organization can assign one if it understands it can make its ISMS work better (for some scenarios, a person dedicated to the specific activities of the management system can better ensure and improve its results).
A CISO can assume the role of MR in an ISMS in case of need (if you have only ISO 27001 our recommendation would be to have only CISO.), but in organizations with multiple ISO management systems, maybe it is better to have CISO and MR as separated roles, because as MR must be competent on the requirements of the multiple management systems the organization has, the CISO is specialized in Information Security, and maybe overwhelmed by activities regarding other managements systems.
Answer: When dealing with business continuity planning, you always must consider the worst case scenario to make a decision, taking in account not only technical and financial issues, but any other issue considered relevant to the organization. So in your scenario, the Maximum Allowable Outage (MAO) should be based on the time that an financial impact would take to be so great that it would compromise business survival.
1. ISO 9001:2015 requires that an organization determines the internal and external issues that can affect its intended results. The other word for the external issue is: context. ISO 9001:2015 does not prescribe any method to determine context. You can use, for example: Opportunities and threats taken from the SWOT analysis and/or you can brainstorm external issues using the PESTEL framework.
2. If you check the ISO definition for risk, “effect of uncertainty on an expected result”, you can start by determining what are the expected results from your management system, from your products and services and from your processes. Then, for each determined expected result, you can start listing positive (opportunities) and negative (risks) deviations that can occur because of the uncertainty that exists in the world
3. Here, I can just give you my guess. According to my experience organizations had some difficulties in developing preventive actions. I believe that the risk-based approach makes it easier:
to look forward and think about what can happen and if we should do anything about it;
to apply preventive actions at a more strategic level of an organization
The following material will provide you information about the risk-based approach and the context of an organization:
Gracias por tu respuesta Antonio, efectivamente la duda fue aclarada, es mejor definir una Sola política de alto nivel y varias políticas específicas o detalladas, en realción al documento me parece muy completo, pero no aborda la parte de Sanciones en caso de incumplimiento de la Política, como aseguramos que se cumpla si no establecemos Multas y sanciones para que los empleados tomen conciencia de las buenas practicas.