Management Review inputs and monitoring and measurement
Answer:
According to the process approach, your QMS is a set of interrelated processes. Every process has indicators or some other methods of measuring and monitoring performance. The Management Review Meeting (MRM) is a good place to do two things with those methods. First, are they relevant? Do you still consider them to be good choices to monitor and measure performance? Do you see better choices? Second, what about the performance level according to those indicators and other methods? Should your company update the targets for performance? Should your company develop improvement actions?
The following material will provide you information about monitoring and measurement:
Answer: Financial information is only one kind of information that may require the application of control A.14.1.3 (Protecting application services transactions). Other examples of information that may require protection in application service transactions are health information and information the organization classified as sensitive.
So, even if your organization don't have online financial transaction you may have other types of sensitive information processed by your web applications that may require the application of control A.14.1.3. You should consult your inventory of assets, the information classification policy and which information are processed on your web applications to verify if control A.14.1.3 is applicable.
(What is the difference between the asset owner and the risk owner?)
Answer: The asset owner is the person responsible for protecting and managing an asset in your company, while the risk owner is a person designated to solve a risk. Although these are different roles, they can be performed by the same person in a small organizations, but you should note that designating these roles to the same person becomes increasingly complex as the quantity of assets and risks under his responsibility increases.
Answer: This statement is only a recommendation. ISO 27001 control A.8.2.2 (Labeling of information) does not define any form of labeling, only that a labeling procedure must be defined and implemented (if the control is considered applicable). How to label information is an organization's decision. In cases where the implementation of labeling is not feasible, or it will require much effort or resources, an organization can define that labeling will not be applicable.
Answer: To ensure a better alignment between Information security and cyber security practices it is better to consider the Cyber Security Policy as a section of your Information Security Policy. Regarding which points you should consider, a good reference is the ISO 27032 standard, which provides guidelines for cyber security. In terms of policies you should consider the following topics:
- Guidelines to be followed when you are an information providing organization and when you are an information receiving organization
- Classification and categorization of information
- Information minimization
- Limited audience
- Coordination protocol
Answer: In principle any process and/or organizational unit can be excluded from the ISMS scope, but sometimes the effort to implement such segregation is not worthy (e.g., the organization is too small or the process/organizational unit has many relations with elements included in the scope), so your organization should evaluate this situation first before deciding to include or not the purchasing in the scope.
These materials will also help you regarding scope definition:
- Book Secure & Simple: A Small-Business Guide to Implementing ISO 27001 On Your Own https://adv isera.com/books/secure-simple-a-small-business-guide-toimplementing-iso-27001-on-your-own/
- Free online training ISO 27001 Foundations Course https://advisera.com/training/iso-27001-foundations-course/
GDPR implementation process in a non-EU country
Answer: Your company needs to be compliant with the GDPR only if it collects personal data from citizens of European Union; if you do not collect such information, then you do not have to be compliant. This principle is valid no matter whether your company is based in EU or outside of it.