Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
You can download an explanation of ISO 22301 standard here: Clause-by-clause explanation of ISO 22301 https://info.advisera.com/27001academy/free-download/clause-by-clause-explanation-of-iso-223012008
In the ISO 27001 & ISO 22301 toolkit you purchased, you will find the document called "List of documents" - it defines which documents are needed for ISO 22301 implementation.
To simplify this, if you want to implement only ISO 22301 without ISO 27001, you would need to implement documents from these folders, in this very sequence:
00 Document management
01 Preparations for the project
02 Identification of requirements
05 Risk assessment and treatment
08 Annex A controls - A.17 Business continuity
09 Training and awareness
10 Internal audit
11 Management review
12 Corrective actions
In SOP for infrastructure you need to consider the following:
More information on this topic you can find in the following article:
You can also see how the procedures for infrastructure and records of the infrastructure maintenance in our ISO 13485:2016 documentation toolkit look like:
Concerning the EU GDPR membership and countries outside of the membership;The EU GDPR will be mirrored by the UK-GDPR version - would this be subject to regular reviews?
The UK chose to mirror the EU GDPR in order to have an adequate decision by the EU Commission and not lose the free flow of data among EU and UK. It is difficult to forecast regular reviews, either on the EU GDPR or the UK GDPR side.We can imagine a coherent evolution for both regulations in order to provide a standard to controllers and processors, but most will depend on how the relationship between the UK and the EU will continue.
Hypothetically, if the EU were to break up - would the GDPR be able to continue under a unified, but individual country membership?I live in the UK (Scotland) and hope this does not become a reality.
The EU GDPR is a regulation of the EU and it produces effects in Member State on the basis of the EU Treaties. In the unlikely event of EU break up, the Treaties will not produce their effects anymore and the GDPR will have no effects in the former EU States unless the country mirrors it with internal legislation. The negotiation on the dissolving EU may also end with an international agreement adopting the GDPR as a separate treaty in order to benefit each State of the same regulation.
Here you can find more information on the territorial scope of the GDPR
To have a deeper idea of the list of requirements of GDPR you can consider enrolling in our free online training EU GDPR Foundations Course: https://advisera.com/training/eu-gdpr-foundations-course//
There is no certification process of compliance with GDPR. However, some ISO standards like ISO 27001 and 27701 may end up in conformity to GDPR requirements.
Here you can find more information about ISO 27001 and GDPR:
There is also our Free webinar:
To have a deeper idea of the list of requirements of GDPR you can consider enrolling in our free online training EU GDPR Foundations Course: https://advisera.com/training/eu-gdpr-foundations-course//
If the organization's OEM automotive customer is Ford, Customer-specific requirements (CSR) are already available on the IATF web page and the FORD portal. Therefore, FORD does not give its specific requirements separately.
Your customer portal usage is opened by the customer and you enter it with your password. Portal usage is available for all automotive IATF OEM customers and CSR’s are also uploaded on the IATF website.
If your customer is not Ford, you should use your main customers' customer-specifics requirements (CSR). You should request CSR from your main customer.
The major finding is that CSRs are not reviewed, included in the quality management system, and not implemented
For more information, please see the following article:
Yes, it is the same. In the ISO 13485:2016 requirement, 4.2.3 Medical device file is stated that an organization must establish the medical device file with the content not limited to the one that is described there. Also, requirement 4.1 states that the organization must be in compliance with all necessary regulatory requirements.
On the EU market, it is not possible to put a medical device without having a technical file under the MDD 93/42/Eec or, from May 2021. according to the MDR 2017/745.
For more information please see the following articles:
I assume you are asking how ISO 17025 accreditation would assist you improve the quality of testing ? Your laboratory would benefit from implementing ISO 17025 as the purpose is to guide laboratories to achieve competency and consistently valid results. What you mentioned would be the laboratory’s scope of testing. Method development, validation and measurement uncertainty will be an important focus to achieve your scope.
For further information see the following:
That would not be appropriate to calibrate an auto titrator. Note firstly that ”a grade glassware” is not a Certified Reference material. The glassware does not come with an individual calibration certificates.
Your equipment supplier or equipment manual should provide you with suitable information, Simply stated, you would need to use a suitable balance and determine the volume dispensed gravimetrically; or use a primary standard for titration to determine the linearity and correlation coefficient of the auto titrator. Depending on the methods you use, you would select a suitable primary standard and titrate a range of five quantities as per your method to provide data for the calculations.
The following toolkit document, with associated records may be of interest Equipment and Calibration Procedure at https://advisera.com/17025academy/documentation/equipment-and-calibration-procedure//
It's our policy not to make recommendations about technologies or products, but from our experience with small and midsized businesses, the excel base tool is still the best solution balancing cost and effectiveness.
To make a usability benchmark, I suggest you see the free demo of our Risk Assessment table (it has been widely used by small and midsized businesses all around the world in their certified ISO 27001 ISMSs). This template used the approach asset-threat, vulnerability.
You can see a demo of this template at this link: https://advisera.com/27001academy/documentation/risk-assessment-table/
These articles will provide you a further explanation about risk assessment according to ISO 27001:
Please note that ISO 27001 specifies that the CIA is directly related to risks (6.1.2 c 1), and to consequences (i.e., impacts) (6.1.2 d 1), and asset value (in your case privacy severity) is defined in terms of legal requirements (e.g., laws, regulations, and contracts), and their criticality and sensitivity to compromise due to realized risks.
There is no direct relation between the CIA triad and Asset value to probability.
For further information, see:
- ISO 27001 risk assessment: How to match assets, threats and vulnerabilities https://advisera.com/27001academy/knowledgebase/iso-27001-risk-assessment-how-to-match-assets-threats-and-vulnerabilities/
- How to assess consequences and likelihood in ISO 27001 risk analysis https://advisera.com/27001academy/iso-27001-risk-assessment-treatment-management/#assessment
This material can also help you:
- Book ISO 27001 Risk Management in Plain English https://advisera.com/books/iso-27001-annex-controls-plain-english/
- Free online training ISO 27001 Foundations Course https://advisera.com/training/iso-27001-foundations-course/