Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
Perhaps each big engineering equipment is made to order according to specific customer needs. Validation can be done through simulations and testing under intended user conditions or, for example, during installation with tests. For example, When I worked in the chemical industry my company ordered equipment, a chemical reactor for example, during installation I remember doing water-pressure tests and shaft rotation tests to confirm safety and performance.
The following material will provide you more information:
We received this question:
Thanks Rhand, for our readiness assessment the external auditors issued a finding that we did not explicitly define a policy/procedure describing the context of the organization, they went on further to say we should determine if any internal and external issues would impact the intended outcome of the ISMS.
You guys are saying we do not need to document the context of the organization but we should have a procedure to check internal and external issues.
What I am going to do is add internal and external issues to our yearly compliance check with a step to ensure we determine whether any of these issues impact the intended outcome of the ISMS. Do you think this is sufficient?
Answer: Regarding your proposed solution, adding an internal and external issues to your yearly compliance check would be sufficient to meet standards requirements.
Please note that it is not a matter that "You guys are saying we do not need to document the context of the organization...", but that the ISO 27001 standard itself does not require such documentation. Considering the standard, the issue raised by the external auditors is at most an opportunity for improvement (not a nonconformity).
As a suggestion, you should politely ask your external auditors for clarification about which clause part of the standard requires a policy/procedure describing the context of the organization.
For further information, see: Explanation of the basic terminology in ISO standards https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2015/01/12/explanation-of-the-basic-terminology-in-iso-standards/
ISO 27001 does not prescribe keeping maintenance logs.
For ISO 27001, the need to keep logs is defined by the results of risk assessment and applicable legal requirements, and also by the need to prove to auditors that security processes are being performed. These are the elements that will help you define which information must be logged, as well as for how long.
These articles will provide you a further explanation about logging:
This material will also help you regarding logging:
As far as I understood your question you presented this scenario:
I can add more information:
ISO 9001:2015 no longer mentions preventive action. So, will only speak about corrective action. Go back to your production and raise a corrective action request. Start by stratifying the defects type. Use, for example, a Pareto Chart. For the more common defects try to find the root cause(s).
You can find more information below:
Unfortunately, Advisera’s scope of work is around management systems not product certification. So, I cannot tell you which certifications are needed in each country. If its your first experience of exporting outside Asia, I would rather start with one market, perhaps the less difficult to penetrate. Find certifications required, apply and enter the market. In more mature markets it may be useful to add a management system certification for quality and/or environment. For example, in Europe I see a lot of manufacturers for mature markets applying for ISO 14001 certification to cater clients and consumers that value that message.
Please check this information below with more detailed answers:
With ISO 9001:2015 there is no longer a mandatory requirement for the existence of a function as Management representative or Coordinator for QMS 9001:2015. So, each organization is free to decide to have such a function and to design roles & responsibilities. As a suggestion I invite you to look for ISO 9001:2015 clause 5.1.1 and think about how you can help top management performing their duties with the management system. Other suggestion varies according to the size of the organization and its organization chart. For example, supervise:
You can find more information below:
1.An Integrated approach of ISO 13485 and ISO9001 What should be focused on considering these 2 standards (These will be audited separately). For integrated approach, I am following Anenxure B of ISO 13485
Yes, for integrated part you can follow Annex B of the ISO 13485:2016 standard. Be focused on the following:
To strictly defined and state in Quality manual which requirements from ISO 13485:2016 are not applicable for your process and medical device. For example, if your medical device is not sterile, then requirements 7.5.5 Particular requirements for sterile medical devices and requirement 7.5.7 Particular requirement for validation of processes for sterilization and sterile barrier systems are not applicable for you.
There are certain requirements in the ISO 13485 that need to have documented procedures, while there are no such strict requirements in the ISO 9001:2015. For example, you need to make a documented procedure for purchasing (requirement 7.4.1), the procedure for validation (7.5.6), the procedure for identification, and traceability (7.5.8 and 7.5.9).
For more information what ISO 13485 is, please see the article on the following link:
For more information about Similarities and differences between ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 13485:2016, please see the article on the following link: https://advisera.com/9001academy/blog/2015/01/21/iso-9001-vs-iso-13485/
2. How to pass ISO 9001 stage 1 and stage 2 audit?
To pass ISO 9001 stage 1 and stage 2 audit, your organization must have a quality management system designed according to ISO 9001:2015 requirements and must be implemented and followed.
3. A Regulatory procedure and form is required that will meet both the standards requirements
You can add in your Quality manual cross-reference table for your Quality management system between ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 13485:2016.
If your company is under German law, you will apply German law and GDPR towards all your data processing activities no matter where your employees are located.
From a GDPR point of view, data processed by employees must comply with GDPR requirements wherever your employees are located. Therefore, you should consider your employee as a German or EU employee and require following the same data policy of your organization. This happens because GDPR compliance is an obligation of the data controller who must assess that everyone in its organization complies with it.
There are other aspects of the employment agreement (wage, illness, social security) which may differ from country to country, and for those, you should check with a labor lawyer.
Yes, you are right. Please check ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.5.3.2 a). Organizations should have a way of controlling distribution of, or access to, relevant quality management system documents. If documents are on paper, I recommend using a matrix that relates document identification, version, location and who has access to it. If documents are on a digital support, I still recommend the use of a matrix to relate document identification, version, and who has access to it. This is critical to ensure that paper documents are updated whenever there is a change in version and that people is informed of the change (for paper and digital documents).
You can find more information below: