Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
Is there anyone who has implement COSO ERM and ISMS together? Can you use COSO ERM to do ISMS risk assessment? Can someone share how it is being implemented? Do you use any tools?
Can ISMS use its own risk assessment methodology and approach that is different from COSO ERM?
I hope I understood your question. Any EMS must be aware of compliance obligations and its changes. I use an Environmental Compliance Software in my work. It allows me to identify environmental legislation changes, its content and applicability.
You can find more information below:
Production, packaging and warehouse for finished products is mainly treated in clauses 8.5, 8.6 and 8.7 of ISO 9001:2015 in things like is concerned with:
You can find more information below:
As far as I understand your question, top management must determine who has the authority to approve each document relevant for the quality management system.
So, validating a QMS document requires its approval by an authorized person. Please consider this article - Some tips to make Document Control more useful for your QMS - https://advisera.com/9001academy/blog/2014/05/20/tips-make-document-control-useful-qms/ - with the main steps for controlling documents
You can find more information about documents and records below:
Organizations exist to serve interested parties. While trying to do that, organizations are constrained, helped or hindered by other interested parties. So, organizations have to consider and manage what each interested party need or expect in order to meet expected results and minimize risks.
You can find more information about interested parties below:
I would verify if:
You can look for more information below:
IATF 16949: 2016 standard 6.1.2.3 e) says "periodically test the contingency plans for efficiency (eg simulations as appropriate)".
Also in article c) "prepare contingency plans for continuity of supply in the event of any of the following: key equipment failures (also see Section 8.5.6.1.1); interruption from externally provided products, processes, and services; recurring natural disasters; wastage; utility interruptions; labor shortages; or infrastructure disruptions".
In the following case, for the cases specified in article c); testing or simulation is mandatory. The organization can determine the frequency of testing or simulation according to the risk and its impact on the customer.
So, at least for all cases, you can test or simulate once; then you can determine the frequency according to the results, risk.
The list of internal documents are all documents that you will prepare for your Quality management system (documented procedures). Records are documents that arise as a result of some work, testing, reports, and similar.
For more information, please see the following articles:
Yes, you can add OFI (observation for Improvement) to your audit report.
You can find more information below:
This topic changes according to the size of the company and the structure of the organization. But according to my experience as a result of my audits, main problematic issues are the following:
1. Defining contingency action plans and test/simulation results
2. Problem-solving root cause analysis and systematic action identification and parallel of this the FMEA/control plan review/update with customer complaint management process
3. Being able to do FMEA correctly
4. Change Management
5. Rework/Repair identification and risk analysis
6. MSA application
7. Manufacturing feasibility documentation and review for new facility and equipment
8. General process-based risk assessment
9. Supplier based risk assessment and supplier audit/development plan
10. Interested party’s expectation management and to deploy the organization QMS
11. Customer-specific requirements documentation, management, and implementation into organization quality management