Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
I believe that you can find an explanation in this free webinar on demand - How to perform an ISO 9001:2015 internal audit - https://advisera.com/9001academy/webinar/how-to-perform-an-iso-9001-2015-internal-audit-free-webinar-on-demand/
For example, on slide 9 we present the process:
Then, we develop each step.
You can find more information about the internal audits in following links:
ISO 9001:2015 no longer requires the role of an ISO representative. Many organizations continue to consider that function within their quality management system architecture. Once ISO 9001:2015 no longer mentions the ISO representative, each organization can design the set of authorities and responsibilities most suitable for their particular situation.
A classic is being responsible for liaison with certification body. Other responsibilities can be:
You can find more information about the management representative in following links:
The BCMS scope should include all departments that can affect your organization's capability to deliver your products and/or services. For example, in a beverage industry, the logistics department plays a crucial role in delivering the products, so it should be considered in a BCMS implementation. The same applies to air traffic control activities for airports. So, you should consider your business products and/or services nature, and how your departments impact them, to identify which departments should be included in the BCMS scope.
These articles are related to ISMS but can provide some tips about defining a BCMS scope:
These materials will also help you regarding BCMS scope definition:
I suppose you are the quality manager. Let us focus on ISO 9001:2015 clause 9.3.
Clause 9.3.1 is about the purpose of the management review (slide 8)
Management review is more than a meeting it is a process (slide 9)
Who participates? Top management and managers (slide 10)
Clause 9.3.2 is about the inputs to the management review (slide 11) – each participant has first-hand knowledge about specific topics and can be responsible for leading the conversation about decisions and actions about that topic.
Please check this free webinar on demand where all these topics are treated - How to perform management review according to ISO 9001:2015 - https://advisera.com/9001academy/webinar/how-to-perform-management-review-according-to-iso-9001-2015-free-webinar-on-demand/
You can find more information about management review in the following links:
Thank you.
Your organization, with ISO 9001:2015 clause 4.2, determined relevant interested parties and their relevant requirements and/or expectations. So, considering those relevant interested parties, your organization should determine what needs to be communicated to each party (internal or external) in terms of the quality management system. For example, your organization may want to communicate process performance to employees, or quality test results to clients or environmental information to the local community. For each “what to communicate” your organization should plan (I use a table):
The following material will provide you information about communication:
- Communication requirements according to ISO 9001:2015 - https://advisera.com/9001academy/blog/2016/11/01/communication-requirements-according-to-iso-9001-2015/
- You can enroll for free in this ISO 9001:2015 Foundations Course - https://advisera.com/training/iso-9001-foundations-course/
- Book - Discover ISO 9001:2015 Through Practical Examples - https://advisera.com/books/discover-iso-9001-2015-through-practical-examples/
Do I need to edit the same BC strategy document and add BC strategy for a new business unit or can I create a new BC strategy document for each department?
ISO 22301 does not prescribe how documents need to be developed, so organizations are free to develop them as best to fulfill their needs.
You can create a new BC strategy document for the new department, but you should evaluate if the effort to review and maintain two separate documents are worthy.
Both single and separated documents are accepted approaches. A single document is better to centralize strategies and make systemic review easier, but it can become too big and complex document to handle, while separated documents are easier to handle, but increases the administrative effort to review and maintain them.
A mixed approach would be to create a document with parts that are common for all strategies and then create separate documents with only the specifics of each department.
This article will provide you an idea about developing one o several documents:
This material can also help you with the business continuity strategy:
Do I need to write the workaround of the processes/activities which I recognize in BIA conducted with the departments, in the BC plan?
I'm assuming that by "workaround" you mean a temporary fix to be used as a bypass of a recognized problem.
ISO 22301 requires you to create strategy/solutions and BC plans based on the BIA results - therefore, this should not be a workaround, rather it should be the update of those documents (if you already have them).
These articles will provide you an idea about developing BCPs:
This material can also help you with the business continuity plan:
Can I have a single document of both the BC strategy and plan in a single document for each business unit?
This is acceptable considering compliance with ISO 22301, but during a disruption, you will need rather short and clear documents to execute (i.e. the BC plans), and if such documents also include the BCP strategy they will become unnecessarily complex and will be difficult to execute.
Additionally, you also should evaluate if the effort to review and maintain two separate documents is worthy, and sometimes the business continuity strategy contains sensitive information that should not be shared together with the BCP document.
Let us look into a process:
First, think about the purpose of the process: Why does this process exist? What is the rationale for its existence? Consider a process, any process, for example:
What can be the purpose of this process?
How will you know that the purpose is being met?
One way of measuring performance is at a macro level, measuring the purpose effectiveness.
For this particular case indicators can be:
Another way of measuring process performance is at micro or internal level. Let us zoom and see what is happening inside the “Manufacture parts” process:
Whenever I see a flowchart of a process, I think about possible indicators of process performance, mainly efficiency indicators:
Whenever you see a decision box in a flowchart you can check if there are any relevant indicators concerning rates (rate of good over bad, rate of one decision over another decision)
A third kind of indicator is about quantity. For example:
Please consider our free webinar on demand - Measurement, analysis, and improvement according to ISO 9001:2015 - https://advisera.com/9001academy/webinar/measurement-analysis-and-improvement-according-to-iso-9001-2015-free-webinar/ There one can find the rationale for developing effectiveness indicators and a monitoring plan:
On our free webinar on demand – The Process Approach - What it is, why it is important, and how to do it - https://advisera.com/9001academy/webinar/iso-9001-process-approach-free-webinar-on-demand/ one can find an example of a flowchart that describes the flow of activities.
The following material will provide you information about indicators:
Yes, you can do it yourself. It probably won't be as fast as with a consultant, but it will be more economical.
If you decide to go by yourself Advisera can help you:
Probably you will need some help on environmental legislation. Perhaps you can use a economic sector association, or a legal consultant or a environmental legislation software service company.
1. We have been told by a client (a bank) that we need to become ISO27001 accredited as a company to meet their security standards.
But we are only a small organisation and do not have in-house IT people.
Would you recommend we contract an IT consultant for some time and use your framework?
First is important to note that:
Regarding the implementation approach, there are three major options:
a) using your own personnel
b) hiring a consultant
c) using a DIY approach with external support
All of them have their advantages and disadvantages, considering time, cost, effort, and preservation of knowledge, and you should consider these factors to decide which approach is best for you.
These articles will provide you further explanation about ISO 27001:
These materials will also help you regarding ISO 27001:
2. How do you work with clients like us? I’m not sure where to start?
Our ISO 27001 Toolkit follows the "DIY with external support" approach, and by which you stated about your business, it is the right solution for you. The templates in the toolkit are 90% completed and you only have to include the information about your organization and the specifics about the controls that will be used.
The templates have lots of comments that will help you including your information. And if you are stuck at any moment in the process, you can contact us through e-mail (there is no limit for how many emails you can send), or schedule online meetings with one of our experts.