Answer
I miss the context of the situation to give a straight answer. There is no requirement in ISO 9001:2015 that makes mandatory the implementation of an EMS. What can happen is that your organization may have customers that require that their suppliers have an EMS. In that case the auditors’ comment is understandable. Another possibility is that your organization developed internal environmental practices that are not being followed and that is why auditors said that you need to train employees about your environmental practices.
Dos o más organizaciones bajo el mismo certificado
para al documentación de estos procesos de apoyo dentro del alcance se puede dejar establecido que se brinda apoyo para la empresa No.2 ?
o se debe hacer ese mismo procedimiento dos veces uno para la empresa 1 y otro para la empresa 2 teniendo en cuenta que los recursos provienen directamente de la empresa No. 1
Answer:
La opción de tener dos sistemas de administración separados es solo una de las opciones disponibles. Es posible tener dos o más organizaciones bajo el mismo certificado, incluso si son entidades legalmente independientes.
El siguiente material le proporcionará información sobre la subcontratación:
Answer: The value reflecting the effects of an incident that has occurred must be inserted in column G "Consequences" (from the perspective of ISO 27001 "impact" is the same thing as "consequences"), and to know what to include in this column, I suggest you this article:
- How to assess consequences and likelihood in ISO 27001 risk analysis https://advisera.com/27001academy/iso-27001-risk-assessment-treatment-management/#assessment
By the way, included in your toolkit you have access to a video tutorial that can help you fill in the Risk Assessment Table, using real examples.
AS9100 Product safety requirements
Answer:
Product safety is defined in clause 3.4 as the product being able to perform its function without causing unacceptable risk or harm to persons or damage to property. So, by this definition product safety is about not causing injury to people or damage to property. Keeping this in mind when you read clause 8.1.3 for the requirements of product safety, we see that AS9100 asks that we put in place controls to assure product safety throughout the lifecycle of the product, or in other words ensure that the product behaves in a way to reduce or eliminate the risk of injury or property damage until it is disposed of at the end of life.
There is a list of examples that may be included in your proce ss, such as assessing hazards, reporting on events, communication and training of safety hazards, etc. If you have a product that does not have any safety risks, then just doing this assessment is enough since there is nothing to control. However, if you have safety risks you may need to identify this through the process. For example, if you had a product that held an electrical charge that could injure workers or damage property either at your facility or after delivery, you may need to have safety warning labels on the product or in the installation instructions as a control.
For your example of connectors, it is the safety aspects of the connectors through the lifecycle. How are not responsible for the safety aspects of products where your connector is used. If someone using your connector on a product where your connector becomes a contact point for power, this is up to them to determine and control. Your connector has no safety considerations by itself.
For a better understanding of the aerospace definitions in AS9100 Rev D, see the article: Five special aerospace terms in AS9100 Rev D, https://advisera.com/9100academy/blog/2017/05/01/five-special-aerospace-terms-in-as9100-rev-d/
Requirement to be a QMS consultant
Do I need to be certified, in some way, to help them design and implement a Quality management policy that will eventually be audited by an ISO auditor?
Answer
There is no legal requirement for an ISO 9001 consultant to be certified in any way.
Answer
Your QMS shall define authorities and responsibilities for several roles and functions.
Someone shall have the authority to approve the need for forms and their codification. There are several possible alternatives for codification. For example, some organizations just use a serial number, others use a serial number and a process or department reference.
By our experience, an ISMS based on ISO 27001 implements something around 100 from the 114 controls from Annex A, and the results of risk assessment are just one of three general justifications to implement a control. The other two are:
- Legal requirements (e.g., contracts, laws, regulations, etc.) demand the implementation of a control
- Top management decisions demand the implementation of a control (e.g., by considering it a good practice)
If none of the above situations occurs, then you can justify not implementing a control with a text something like : "There are no un acceptable risks nor legal requirements that would demand this control."
At the maintenance warehouse, lubricating oils are handled to apply in preventive maintenance activities. Because people handle lubricating oils there is the possibility of spillages or leakages. If a spillage or leakage occurs, there is the possibility of contamination of soil or water.
The potential spillage or leakage is an environmental aspect, an element of an organization’s products, services and activities which can interact with the environment. Other examples of environmental aspects are, for example, discharges to water, emissions to air, use of natural resources and materials, or generation of wastes. Environmental impacts are the consequences of the environmental aspects.
At the example above, the environmental aspect is permanent but the environmental impact depends of the context, depends on the use of preventive and responsive measures.
How can a bu siness assess the risks of its environmental impacts?
Answer:
Some environmental impacts are more or less predictable. For example, if an organization cuts metal sheets it will always generate metallic waste. Other environmental impacts have more uncertainty associated, like in the example above the contamination of soil or water.
Risks are about uncertainty. For example, is there any risk (any possibility) of extraordinary inefficient metal cutting, generating more metallic waste? Is there any risk of contamination of soil or water because of the handling of lubricating oils?
The organization can evaluate those risks considering the actual situation. For example, if there are preventive measures and responsive means in place perhaps the probability of occurrence and consequences of occurrence make the risk less relevant.
The following material will provide you information about assessment of environmental interactions: