Based on your description you will be sending marketing emails to a potential client database. In this case, it is very important that whoever provides you the database can also be able to prove that the persons in the database have provided their consent to be approached for marketing reasons.
Just one more thing, with the 2015 version is it still necessary to have a quality manual?'
Answer
ISO 9001:2015 does not require a quality manual and does not forbid its use. I understand that your question is about an organization subcontracting design and development activities. An organization should evidence planning and control of subcontracted activities. You don’t have to detail your external service provider's design and development, you have to detail supplying or controlling design and development inputs, and at least control activities (at least verification and validation activities).
There is not such requirement of a minimum amount of peformance data in ISO 9001:2015. There are just some mandatory documents that are required by ISO 9001 in order to be compliant with the standard. In this article you can find those mandatory documents - List of mandatory documents required by ISO 9001:2015: https://advisera.com/9001academy/knowledgebase/list-of-mandatory-documents-required-by-iso-90012015/
Transfer of employee personal data to a third party
Answer:
Usually, for these kinds of processing activities companies rely on legitimate interest rather than consent. Basically what you need to do is to specify in your Employee Privacy Notice the fact that their personal data may be transferred to third party processors that perform payroll and accounting services.
1 - During the risk assessment, can we already take existing controls into consideration to assess the risk level ? and immediately assess the residual risk ?
Answer: In fact you must consider the existing controls when assessing risk, including the information about implemented controls in the last column. In this case the assessed risk will be already a residual risk, which can or can't be acceptable according your risk acceptance criteria.
2 - In the toolkit there is a risk treatment “table” and a risk assessment “plan”
What is the difference between both documents because in my assumption the “table” is already enough as a plan ?
Answer: The Appendix 2 Risk Treatment Table is the document used to select treatment options and controls.
The Risk Treatment Plan is the document where you list all the actions and resources needed to implement the treatment options identified in the Risk Treatment Table, as well as the respective deadlines an d responsible people.
As you can see, from the Risk treatment table to the risk treatment plan, the information becomes more focused on the risks that must be treated. You could have all this information in a single document, but this will make it more complex to handle.
By the way, included in the toolkit you bought you have access to video tutorials that will explain you about these documents and how to fill them in.
ISO 22301 and ISO 27001 share many similar requirements that allow the use of a single document for both systems (e.g., document control procedure, internal audit etc.). Other required documents defined specifically for each standard, such as security policies and continuity strategy, can be kept separated without risks to create inconsistencies.
This article will provide you further explanation about integrating management systems:
- How to implement integrated management systems https://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/ 15/10/05/how-to-implement-integrated-management-systems/
1. MSS being a critical service chosen for BCP. However MSS will have multiple inter dependency process like infra, service mgmt, endpoint.
a. So do we have to conduct BIA individually for every inter dependent process too or BIA will be done only for MSS but it takes inputs from inter dependent process”.?
Answer: In fact both approaches are acceptable (a BIA for each supporting process or a single BIA for MSS), and both have their own advantages and disadvantages, and you have to consider them to chose the best approach to your organization:
- Performing a BIA for each supporting process is less complex and will require less people involved in each process (only the people directly involved in the process), but you have to evaluate the results of each BIA all together later, to have a picture for the MSS, and the independent BIAs may hide issues that only can be identified when analyzed together, and you may have to perfor m some BIAs again.
- Performing a single BIA for MSS will provide you a systemic picture of all situations that may cause disruption of MSS (e.g., failures on independent process that together can disrupt MSS), and probably will need to be performed only once, but it is a more complex process and you may have a problem to schedule meetings with all people involved.
By the way, included in the toolkit you bought you have access to a video tutorial that can help you perform BIA, including examples with real data.
2. Regarding “Business_Impact_Analysis_Methodology_EN”,
a. how do we complete the section 4 “Managing records kept on the basis of this document”?
i. Is the record linked to the specific document? E.g. business impact questionnaire analysis is the record for Business_Impact_Analysis_Methodology_EN”,
Answer: You assumption is correct. The business impact questionnaire analysis is a record for Business Impact Analysis Methodology, and you only have to define who is responsible for this record, where it is stored, controls used to protect this record and for how long you have to keep this record. Detailed information and examples can be found in comments included in the Business Impact Analysis Methodology template.