Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
Since you stated in the SoA that control A.8.2.2 Labelling of information is not applicable, then it is sufficient for you to include only N/A in the Labeling column (there is no need to exclude the column).
Regarding controls A.8.2.1 Classification of information and A.8.2.2, you can implement only A.8.2.1 without implementing A.8.2.2 (i.e., you can define classification levels without the need to label media that contains it, although this is not common).
For further information, see:
Yes, you can follow the same procedure. According to Article 16 from the MDR, if the CE mark of the manufacturer stays on the medical device, you do not consider a manufacturer, but rather the distributor.
1 a) makes available on the market a device under its name, registered trade name, or registered trademark, except in cases where a distributor or importer enters into an agreement with a manufacturer whereby the manufacturer is identified as such on the label and is responsible for meeting the requirements placed on manufacturers in this Regulation.
For more information, see:
COBIT is certifiable only for people, although it can be used by organizations to help fulfill requirements from some ISO management standards, like ISO 20000 and ISO 27001.
For further information, see:
Regarding ISO, it does not certify organizations. Its purpose is to develop standards, and some of these are management systems standards, against which organizations can be certified by entities known as certification bodies.
For further information, see:
It is through method verification of a standard method the laboratory proves with objective evidence that they can perform the method and achieve the expected performance
How this can be achieved depends on the method technique. For example for microscopic examinations, if you are the only technician (hance know the makeup of retained sample) get an independent person to issue the samples to you blind. If you don’t have samples across the range, try and identify another laboratory that does have samples, to do a bilateral study with. I can’t comment specifically on the method you describe as “random”. I suggest you engage with your accreditation body to see if they can assess it as part of their scope. If it is a method that involves certain activities, for example weighing or a complex calculation determination, then do what you can by breaking the method up into these activities and verify the activities you can. For example competency to weigh accurately using certified calibration weights and by validating complex calculations for determination of a parameter.
As the principle of Auditing the management component of all Quality management systems, including ISO 17025 involves the same approach and techniques, you could benefit form the Internal Auditor training offered by the ISO 9001 Academy. Have a look her for further information https://advisera.com/training/iso-9001-internal-auditor-course. To strengthen your skills with ISO 17025 technical assessments, I suggest refresher self-learning on the purpose of ISO 17025 and its risk-based approach.
The following will provide more information for you on Auditing and ISO 17025:
How to perform an internal audit using ISO 19011 at https://info.advisera.com/free-download/how-to-perform-an-internal-audit-using-iso-19011
ISO 17025 document template: Internal Audit Procedure at https://advisera.com/17025academy/documentation/internal-audit-procedure/
The Five Internal Audit Procedure appendices Internal Audit Program, Internal Audit Checklist, Audit Nonconformity Report, Internal Audit Process Checklist and Internal Audit Report are available separately from the procedure link above; or included in the toolkit at https://advisera.com/17025academy/iso-17025-documentation-toolkit/
Clause-by-clause explanation of ISO 17025:2017 at https://info.advisera.com/17025academy/free-download/clause-by-clause-explanation-of-iso-17025/
The Book - ISO internal audit: A plain English guide at https://advisera.com/books/iso-internal-audit-plain-english-guide/
I’m assuming that by SABS you mean the South African Bureau of Standards, and you are referring to SANS 27001:2015, which requirements are exactly the same as ISO 27001:2013.
Considering that, the standard clause 4.1 does not require external and internal issues to be documented, so a template regarding this clause is not necessary.
For further information about context and external and internal issues, see:
Regarding clause 4.3, you can use the ISMS Scope Document template: https://advisera.com/27001academy/documentation/isms-scope-document/
For further information about ISMS scope definition, see:
Please note that only some of these documents are mandatory for an ISO 27001 certified organization (e.g., ISMS scope, and the Information Security Policy), while others will depend if you have implemented some specific controls (e.g., control A.9.1.1 – Access Control Policy requires an Access Control Policy to be documented), and others are not needed at all (e.g., Context of organization, ISMG Governance and Training Matrix).
For a list of mandatory documents for ISO 27001-certified companies, please see:
Considering that, unless this request from the customer is based on a contract or service agreement you have with that company, you do not need to have the documents not required by the main clauses of the standard, or by specific controls you implemented.
You have to consider how important this customer is to you and based on this, decide if you will write these documents.
Regarding the mandatory documents, you should sign an NDA with the customer before providing the documents.
Please note that external and internal issues relevant to the ISMS can be evidenced in Conformio through:
Both modules take into account external and internal issues for the definition of the mentioned documents.
For further information, see:
ISO 45001 is implemented in the same way no matter where in the world it is done, because as an international standard ISO 45001 (Health & Safety management) allow your organization to go beyond simply meeting laws for the environment or health & safety, and instead have a coherent system that allows you to proactively manage these parts of your business. The standards help to focus your efforts on identifying OH&S hazards with a focus on identifying the risk that is posed in order to apply controls to prevent environmental damage, injury or ill health.
It can be difficult to get management commitment for an OHSMS, but this is mostly because it is hard to say how much money will be saved by implementing it, which is how management normally talks. Because it is hard to do this Return On Investment (ROI) type of explanation, the best way to approach this is to talk about the benefits that the management system will bring, many of which are related to money and savings.
To help with this, the attached blogs have a lot of information to help with the conversation: