You can decide how to organize your management review, either through routinely scheduled meetings or through a more continuous review process.
The minimun required inputs ISO9001 that top management needs to review are the following:
- Results of Audits.
- Customer Feedback
- Process Performance and product conformity
- Status of Preventive & Corrective Actions.
- Follow-up Actions from previous Management Reviews.
- Changes that could affect the Quality Management System.
- Recommendations for Improvement
When creating a quality policy you need to consider the following:
- is appropriate to the purpose and context of the organization
- supports the strategic direction of the organization
- provides a framework for the quality objectives of the organization
- includes a commitment for the fullfilment of applicable requirements (customer requirements, regulatory requirements and ISO requirements)
- contains a commitment for continual improvement
Regarding quality objectives - they are goals that can be measured and that are releva nt for the organization in order to increase customer satisfaction. They also must be consistent with the quality policy.
You will also must determine how and when quality objectives will be achieved, what resources will be needed, who will be responsible, and how the results will be assesed.
Yes, ISO 20000 certification for internet data center is good idea.
Here are few benefits of the ISO 20000 implementation (and certification):
- proof of excellence in IT Service Management (ITSM)
- getting ITSM “under control” – meaning managed, measured and improved processes, clear roles&responsibilities, etc.
- distinctiveness from other, non ISO 20000 certified, companies
- integration of ITSM and business operation as well as stakeholders (and their expectations)
- “same language” inside organization
You can find out more in the article “5 key benefits of ISO 20000 implementation” https://advisera.com/20000academy/blog/2016/02/09/5-key-benefits-of-iso-20000-implementation/
Planning communication
Answer:
Your organization, with ISO 9001:2015 clause 4.2, determined relevant interested parties and their relevant requirements and/or expectations. So, considering those relevant interested parties, your organization should determine what needs to be communicated to each party in terms of the quality management system. For example, your organization may want to communicate process performance to employees, or health care results to clients or their families or the local community. For each “what to communicate” your organization should plan (I use a table):
when to communicate – once per month? once per year? Every quarter?
to whom communicate – clearly state who will be the recipients of communication
how will you communicate? – a newsletter? An internal meeting? An e-mail? A press release? An internal report?
Who will communicate? – Which function or functions will be responsible for the communication?
I am a ISO lead auditor with 14 yrs experience in the standards and am looking also at expanding my portfolio to include IT ISO auditing
Any ideas or help appreciated.”
Answer:
Based on your experience description, I would start by contacting consultancy organizations in the market to offer my services as a freelance consultant. At the same time, I would start my commercial activity in order to find clients on my own, and I would develop my marketing activities by starting a blog, or any other way of showing my know-how and experience. About entering IT ISO auditing I can say that it is a very hot job right now with strong demand worldwide:
Answer:
To prepare an environmental risk assessment I consider the definition of risk, the effect of uncertainty that can promote a deviation from intended results. This definition should focus out attention upon intended and unintended results. Then, considering clause 6.1.1 I look into environmental aspects and impacts and determine what possible positive or negative deviations can occur. For example, your organization can control and monitor wastewater quality. What can go wrong with that control or monitoring operation? Look also into compliance obligations, what can go wrong that impair your organization’s capability of complying with water quality discharge permit requirements? Look also into what comes out of context analysis, clauses 4.1 and 4.2. For example, can your organization take advantage of technological developments to improve raw materials consumption? Or consider trends in legislation that can increase environmental performance in a near future.
#1 9.3.2. c) 1) -Does this section may include received certificates from different sponsorships as appreciation like from schools, or clearances/certificates for compliance/registration from different government agencies as required by law?
Answer:
Yes, as long as they allow your organization to perceive your client’s perception about your work. You can also include complaints, praises, client’s evaluations, for example.
#2 9.3.2. e) - What are the specific documents to be inserted or evaluated as source for presentation during the management review meeting/presentation?
Answer:
Your organization previously evaluated risks and opportunities and classified some of them as relevant. According to clause 6.1.2 a) your organization planned some actions to handle those relevant risks and opportunities. Later, your organization will upda te the list of risks and opportunities and their classification. At the management review organizations evaluate if their action plans were effective in reducing, minimizing or controlling risks, or taking advantage of opportunities. This can be evidenced through a risk and opportunities register with a column for evaluating action plans effectiveness.
#3 9.3.2. f)- Previous management review presented a SWOT Analysis, does this said document be updated for this coming new management review or is there any specific documents to be inserted or evaluated as source for presentation during the management review meeting/presentation?”
Answer:
SWOT analysis is more about clause 9.3.2. b).
Clause 9.3.2. f) is about general improvement opportunities resulting from considering all the inputs to the management review.
Applying the standard is not the same as certifying for it. The certification requires a certification body to audit your implementation and verify if it is compliant with all requirements from the standard.
You can implement the standard and not pursue certification. In this case what happens is that this way you gather only partial benefits of the standard (e.g., better internal organization and reduced costs from incidents), but cannot use this implementation as a proper market tool and competitive differential.
We are currently implementing a new Service Management System, i.e. the system to handle tickets from users when having Incidents or service requests regarding their use of IT.
Off course we have many validated IT systemes - and tickets regarding these systems are also handled in this new SMS.
I have now gotten into discussion around validation of this new Service Management System.
In my perception the tickets are Quality Records - and a system handling quality records would need validation.
However I cannot not find a direct link anywhere in ISO13485:2016 - or elsewhere describing this scenario and the requirement to validate.
Am i wrong in my conclusion ?
Answer:
Indeed, you are right that this is a quality record system, therefore, it should be validated. You can refer to clause 4.1.6 and 7.5.4 Servicing activities in ISO 13485 for more information.
This material will help you regarding the validation of your system: