Is ISO 13485 required if we manufacture non-medical parts?
Answer:
ISO 13485 applies to all companies dealing with medical devices. Since in your case, you have clarified that the plastic part is not part of the medical device, ISO 13485 will not be applicable to you. However , you will still need to maintain the specifications and technical details about the part that you are manufacturing for the medical device manufacturer. Since you are currently certified to ISO 9001, it will be quite easy for you to adapt to ISO 13485 which will give you more advantage with your medical device clients in the future.
1. Regarding Inventory of assets: Which assets must be documented? In the tab "Type of Asset" I see a very long list and I think it's not achievable to document all the risks for all these assets, hence the question.
Answer: First it is important to note that you do not need to use all assets listed on the "Type of Asset" tab, they are only suggestions to help you identify which risks are relevant to your organization (the risks that quickly come to your mind). Considering the asset-threat-vulnerability approach for risk assessment this is quite straightforward (from that list you pick the most common and important assets you have, and from them you identify related threats and vulnerabilities).
2. Let us say a control is neither relevant for our company or mandatory for ISO 27001, would I be allowed to write at justification for non-selection that it isn't mandatory for us / ISO 27001?
Answer: A more robust justification for excluding a control would be "There are no unacceptable risks, or legal requirements that demand the implementation of this control", because this one makes explicit the main reasons not to implement a control.
3. Regarding the video tutorial 'How to Write Statement of Applicability' at minute +- 13:45: You're speaking about two mandatory documents, are these by default in the Statement of Applicability template? If that's not the case, in which document can I find these?
Answer: I'm understanding that you are referring to approval of residual risks and the approval for the ISMS implementation. As explained in the tutorial the approval of residual risks is included in the SoA. The record of the approval for the ISMS implementation is done through the Risk Assessment and Treatment Report, located on folder 05 Risk Assessment and Risk Treatment Methodology in your toolkit.
4. In case you're a Web hosting company, the Secure Development Policy isn't mandatory, right? If that is the case, is there anything specific that must be written, or is something similar to this alright: "This Policy is mandatory for ISO 27001, however this is not applicable in our business due to not developing software" ?
Answer: First it is important to note that in the Statement of Applicability the justification refers to controls, not documents. Documents are listed on implementation method, if a control is applicable.
Controls from ISO 27001 Annex A are mandatory only if:
- There are risks identified as unacceptable in the risk assessment that require the implementation of such controls
- There are legal requirements (e.g., contracts, laws, and regulations) that require the implementation of such controls
- There is a top management decision requiring the implementation of such controls
If none of these options occur there is no need to implement such controls, or documents which cover them. In you case you can use the same justification from answer 1 ("There are no unacceptable risks, or legal requirements that demands the implementation of this control")
5. Where could I document all the non-employees of the company in the ISMS Scope Document (apparently they have to sign the 'Statement of Acceptance of ISMS Documents'), do I just document them at 5.2 Organizational units?
Answer: The need for them to sign the 'Statement of Acceptance of ISMS Documents' does not mean they have to be part of the ISMS scope, only that they have to be aware of this document.
Non-employees which are related to processes, services, organizational units, locations, or IT infrastructure inside the scope are normally handled through clauses on contracts and service agreements.
Approaching a case - legal, policy and environmental assessment
QUESTIONS
1. Give the specific legal and policy provisions as per ISO 14000 environmental management framework for this project?”
Answer:
If the proposed location of the construction of the plant is a forest reserve area, then the specific legal provisions have to be directly negotiated with government and/or local authorities because that kind of organization is not easily compatible with a forest reserve area. Due to the planned location, policy should set guidelines around: “scenic areas, water sources, and ecologically sensitive areas within the radius of the project area”
“2. Give a detailed account on how you will carry out an environmental impact assessment?”
Answer:
I cannot give a detailed account of this space. However, I invite you to check these links:
This 2017 version refers to the British version of ISO 27001 (the BS EN ISO/IEC 27001:2017), which does not include any change that impacts requirements defined by the ISO 27001:2013.
Considering that, Conformio set of documents is also compliant with this British version of ISO 27001.
First lets understand the differences between these documents. Normally policies define general guidelines (what must be done), while procedures are more specific (defining how to perform an activity), but it is not mandatory that your documentation is divided in such way.
Considering that, if your "policy" fulfills requirements from Annex A control A.9.4.2 this is compliant with ISO 27001 and will be acceptable for certification audit.
First of all, implementing a certification in multiple geographic locations is a complex task and you should go for it only if it is really necessary for business strategies and objectives. Instead you should consider the prioritization of locations and implementing the certification one location at a time.
Regarding project steps to become certified, they are practically the same for single and multiple locations. Broadly speaking, to implement ISO 27001 an organization has to:
- Obtain top management support
- Define and document a scope based on the needs and expectations of interested parties relevant to information security. At this point, for a multiple location project, you have to identify common needs and handle conflicting issues regarding the multiple locations (e.g. conflicting laws and regulations).
- Define, document and communicate an information security policy and responsibi lities relevant to operation and management of information security. For a multiple location project you should consider an organization wide-policy defining common requirements and defining that local issues are to be considered for specific topics (e.g., common issue may be top management commitment to ISMS, and a specific issue are the definition of security objectives for each location.
- Define a risk assessment and treatment methodology
- Define and allocate competencies and resources for the operation and management of information security
- Implement risk assessment and risk treatment
- Operate the security controls and generate the necessary records. This another point where implementation can differ according the location
- Measure, monitor and evaluate the information security performance
- Implement corrections and improvements
Regarding support required, to increase chances of success, it is important that persons involved have experience in project management and knowledge of the standard, and that you consider hiring expert legal advise to map legal requirements and handle conflicting issues.
A last, but not least, the point is that you have to consider a certification body that can cover all locations you wish to include in your certification.
Answer:
Although ISO 9001:2015 does not require a documented context of the organization when working with organizations, help them develop a document, a report for example, that acts as an input to the management review. Organizations should determine the context and use it to inform decision making. That way, we also ensure that for the next management review the context information is updated.
Also, I’m looking at Conformio, but also need to attach incident, risks, action, etc. Our organization (an agency for UN) is not really big, so budget is a constraint. I would prefer not to go with Eramba (bad experience). Would you have plan for Conformio to add more features ? Or could you suggest a system / platform that can be helpful for us ?
In the second half of 2019 we plan to launch a new version of Conformio which will have a Risk register that will relate assets, threats, vulnerabilities, impact, likelihood, controls, and activities to implement them.
This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember you. We use this information in order to improve and customize your browsing experience and for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy.
If you decline, your information won't be tracked when you visit this website. A single cookie will be used in your browser to remember your preference not to be tracked.