2: Which is an acceptable means for personal data transfer outside of the European Union when the data transfer is between different locations of the same company?
Answers:
1.USA is considered safer to transfer information than China, India, Russia because between UE and USA there is a mechanism to comply with data protection requirements when transferring personal data from the European Union and Switzerland to the United States in support of transatlantic commerce. This mechanism is called Privacy Shield Framework and was designed by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the European Commission and Swiss Administration. More information you can find here https://www.privacyshield.gov/welcome
2. One of the safeguards for transferring data outside the EU between different companies of the same group is “Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs) but you could also use a Intragroup Data Transfer Agreement based on standard contrac tual clauses.
This is not something which is regulated by the EU GDPR and it is entirely up to the company. But, my opinion is that if those documents contain sensitive personal data they should be disposed of in a controlled environment and not in someone's home.
Data Processing Agreement and Data Processing Addendum
When using a third party to process personal data on your behalf you need to ensure that it provides “sufficient guarantees to implement appropriate technical and organizational measures in such a manner that processing will meet the requirements of this Regulation” ( art. 28(1) - “Processors” (https://advisera.com/eugdpracademy/gdpr/processor/).
So, whenever you contract a third party to process personal data on your behalf you need to have a Data Processing Agreement/Addendum (there is not difference they both means the same thing). You can choose to have the content of the Data Processing Agreement/Addendum as a separate section of the commercial agreement although it will be harder to manage.
For internal use the English language documents would be enough.
However customer facing documents should be written in local language. Moreover, supervisory authorities would most likely ask for any documents to be presented to them in local language as well.
Existing contracts and GDPR
Answer:
If you are talking about the contracts with the third parties acting as your data processors than most likely you need to ad to those commercial contact a Data Processing Agreement/Processor addendum or another legally binding document to regulate the relation between you as controller and your third party as data processor.
Assessing the legality of the processing activity as regards to sensitive personal data is something that the controller needs to do. What you need to ensure is that in the contract with the your customer you state that he is fully liable for ensuring that the personal data is collected and processed in a lawful manner.
ISO 27001 versions
Whats the difference between the previous version and new version of ISO 27001.
Answer: This kind of question is not common on interviews (specially considering the previous version of ISO 27001:2013 is from 2005), but the main differences are related to:
- the structure
- Interested parties
- Documented information
- Risk assessment and treatment
- Objectives, monitoring and measurement
- Corrective & preventive actions
- Communication
- the number of controls on Annex A.
Knowledge and certifications for the Information security Officer
Answer: Competences that can improve your performance as an Information security Officer are related to risk management, information security and audit. In terms of certification, you should consider the Lead Auditor or the Lead Implementer certification.