Answer: Controls from section A.12 can be applied both to server systems and employees' equipment, although most of them are generally more applied to servers.
2 - What are operational systems as per ISO 27001 ?
Answer: For ISO 27001, operational systems are considered any set of software, hardware, database and othrr related assets, used in production environments, i.e., programs, applications and equipment used daily to run the business activities.
Applicability of control
Answer: Controls from section A.17 requires more than a plan to be fulfilled (e.g., control A.17.1.2 requires processes, procedures and other controls for maintaining adequate level of continuity), so only a backup plan is not going to be enough to the requirements of section A.17 and you must consider the devrlopmrnte of a Disaster Recovery Plan.
Answer: Basically the RPO means a volume of data stored/processed in a time frame before the occurrence of a disruption that the organization accepts to lose. For example, if you have a RPO of 4 hours, it means the organization accepts to lose stored/processed data in the last 4 hours before the disruptive incident.
Since the variables to evaluate such loss will depend of the business process evaluated, there is no general formula to apply (e.g., for a sales website the number of transactions lost can be a parameter, and for a cloud storage service the volume of data lost can be the parameter). The way to rationalize RPO is by assessing the damage for different amount of data loss - then they will be able to recognize what is acceptable and what is not.
The right to be forgotten does not apply when the processing is:
- necessary for rights of freedom of expression or information;
- for compliance with a legal obligation under Union or Member State law;
- in the public interest or carried out by an official authority;
- for public interest in the area of public health;
- for archiving or research; or
- for legal claims.
So, as you can see setting up a conventional retention period does not give you the right to object to a “erasure” (right to be forgotten request).
DPO Training
We can keep personal data of clients once they are no longer our customers.
(1)True
(2) False
The answer as posted on your website is #2. I disagree with this answer. Please help me understand why I am wrong. Here is an example.
I use a provider of electricity. I then cancel my service with this provider and switch to another. I can still log into the first electricity service provider's website and review my historic bills and they have an account profile on me. This is a legitimate purpose for keeping my personal data even though I am no longer their customer. The same applies for banks, credit cards, etc. Why is the answer false to your question?
Answer:
Article 5.1.(e) of the EU GDPR - “Principles relating to processing of personal data” https://advisera.com/gdpr/principles-relating-to-processing-of-personal-data/ states that “no longer than is necessary for the purposes for which th e personal data are processed” which means that indeed once someone ceases to be your customer their data should be deleted. This is the general rule and this is why the correct answer is “No”.
However, there are some derogation that may apply such as when there is a legal requirement to keep personal data even if the processing activity is over. The bills and transaction history are usually kept for a certain period of time between 5 and 10 years for regulatory purpose so the legal grounds for processing in this case is legal obligation not legitimate interest.
GDPR DPO Job Description
Answer:
According to Recital 97 of the GDPR “data protection officers, whether or not they are an employee of the controller, should be in a position to perform their duties and tasks in an independent manner.”
Also, one of the major roles of the DPO is to protect the rights and freedoms of the individuals whose data are collected. If the emplo yee is both appointed as DPO and is also responsible for determining the purposes and means of processing of individuals data, this conflictual situation would jeopardize the independence of the DPO.
Signing an additional agreement ensuring that the responsibilities of that other function do not affect the carrying out of the DPO role could be a solution for you if the DPO will not be responsible at all for determining the purposes and means of processing (not only on documents but also in the day by day tasks). To be honest this approach is not full proof since it might be difficult in practice for someone to play two conflicting roles .
Another solution would be to appoint an external DPO which represent an easy way to solve the conflict of interest issues and challenges presented by the requirements for independence.
If the data is stored outside the EEA the answer is yes. Usually Mirosoft and Google mention in their T&C or similar documentation where the data would be stored. Check this article https://cloud.google.com/security/gdpr/
Supervisory authority
We are based in Australia and are setting up an (Art 27) Representative office service and a DPO service based out of the UK for Australian businesses to use. Happy to answer questions. Mike Pym. Gordian 02 8075 3805. You must choose a rep service in one of the countries where your relevant data subjects are located, but that rep service can be used for all of EU Member States data subjects. The rep services is different to a DPO, and you will need both in this case . Brexit will make a difference, but what difference only time will tell! Hope that helps.