Is ISO 27001 Risk Assessment Methodology applicable to ISO 22301
Answer:
This is certainly a very good question - actually you can use the ISO 27001 risk assessment methodology also for ISO 22301, because this methodology is so called "asset-based" methodology which lists all the assets, then all related vulnerabilities and threats, and finally calculates the level of risk.
But you are right, there are couple of differences:
1) Information security risk assessment must take into account the consequences related to confidentiality, integrity and availability of assets, whereas the business continuity risk assessment must take into account only the consequences related to availability. Therefore, you can delete "confidentiality" and "integrity" when they are mentioned in the document.
2) ISO 22301 does not require you to have a document called Statement of Applicability, so you can avoid it if you see no value in it for your business continuity (t his document is mentioned in the Risk assessment methodology).
3) Instead of asset-based methodology you can decide to go for a methodology that will be based on critical activities and processes - this will be probably quicker than the asset-based methodology mentioned above, but this will also be less accurate.
Answer: We may say ISO 27001 can provide business values in the following aspects: compliance, marketing edge, expenses decreasing and strengthening of the internal structure. That being said, the following articles may provide you examples about business value that can be achieved with ISO 27001:
Answer: Considering the content of ISO 27013, there is no ISO similar document regarding integration of specific aspects of ISO 27001 (risk assessment and treatment) and ISO 22301 (business impact analysis and business continuity plans), but since both standards follow the same structure, based on ISO Annex SL, their management aspects (e.g., document control, internal audit, management review, etc.) are practically the same, which makes the integration job easier.
Answer: There is no general single answer, since the impacts on information security confidentiality, integrity, or availability for each asset in your scope will vary depending upon the considered threats, which are to be identified during risk assessment. For example, for the asset "research and development information" the threat "fire" will have availability as the aspect most affected, while for the threat "unintentional change of data" the integrity is the most affect aspect.
The purpose of the product verification is to check whether the received product is compliant to the requirements for the product. Depending on the properties of the product, different measurements can be conducted to determine whether it complies to the requirements, it can be measuring dimensions, weight, etc.
Documentation requirements of clause 4.1, 4.2 and 6.1
Answer:
Clauses 4.1 and 4.2 of ISO 14001:2015 do not require any document to be made. Clause 6.1 requires organization to document risks and opportunities to be addressed and this can be done in a form of register. This register can be merged with one for environmental aspects but it would be better if it is separate register because the scope of assessment of environmental aspects and risks and opportunities is different. For more information, see: ISO 14001 risks and opportunities vs. environmental aspects https://advisera.com/14001academy/blog/2016/06/06/iso-14001-risks-and-opportunities-vs-environmental-aspects/
Interpretation of risks in ISO 14001
Answer:
By definition from ISO 14001, the risk is effect of uncertainty . The standard requires organization to identify and address risks and opportunities regarding environmental aspects, compliance obligations and other issues emerging from context of the organization.
The purpose of addressing risks and opportunities is to give assurance that the EMS (Environmental Management System) can achieve its intended outcomes, prevent, or reduce, undesired effects, including the potential for external environmental conditions to affect the organization and achieve continual improvement.