Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
Please note that while ISO 27001 provides a general objective for the disposal of media, it does not provide technical guidance on how to perform media disposal.
To see how a Disposal and Destruction Policy compliant with ISO 27001 looks like, please see this free demo template at this link: https://advisera.com/27001academy/documentation/disposal-and-destruction-policy/
For technical guidance, you should consider these references:
These articles can also help:
1 - A further point to the below on when a document can become a record.
This is the principle in the document change history section of documents, that I’ve been basing our document version control journey on:
V0.1, v0.2, v0.3, v0.4 = Drafts
V1.0 = Approved version based upon v0.4
V1.1, V1.2, V1.3 = Updates to the v1.0. Draft status.
V2.0 = Approved version based upon v1.3
V2.1, V2.2, V2.3, V2.4 = Drafts
V2.4 is reviewed and approved
V3.0 = New approved version.
I had thought that as soon as a document has approved status then it becomes a record. At that point the document which is now in the record log, is subject to the controls re assigning an owner that must check the content on a given review date to ensure that the information and data contained with the document is accurate, current and relevant.
From the advice you have given, I realise I have miss-understood what a record can be and also the control that applies to records. The above example of a document, from what you are saying, is not to be considered a record. However, the quality control still needs to take place to review all documents that have information and data in for their accuracy and relevance etc.?
Please note that a document only becomes a record when you cannot change it anymore (at most you can add an amendment, but the original record is kept intact), and you need to implement controls to ensure unauthorized charges do not occur. While it is subjected to updates, you need to review it when necessary to ensure it is still accurate and relevant, so quality control still needs to perform actions on documents.
2 - Records cannot be edited or amended and they have retention periods, whereas documents are only required up until the point that they are useful to the business. Therefore, all previous versions of documents can be archived or deleted. Is this a correct statement?
Filling and exclusion of a number of obsolete versions of documents (i.e., approved versions that were replaced by updated ones) will depend on the applicable requirements for records retention. For example, for some documents, you may need to keep all previous versions, while for others you may need to keep only the two previous versions.
3 - A secondary point, is the above example of version control a good practice approach or am I leading our team down the wrong path?
Your example of versioning is a common one used in the marketing and is fine to be used for ISO 27001.
When you use an external laboratory, ISO 17025 accreditation is a must.
If your supplier who produces the product performs the tests in his own laboratory, I think that if he provides you with evidence that he is in compliance with the 7.1.5.3.1 requirements of the standard, that is, that his internal laboratory is in compliance, it will be sufficient with PPAP.
But again, to be safe, it would be better if you have the tests that are legally required on the product done by an accredited laboratory.
Timeframe is one thing, monitoring frequency is another:
If the monitoring frequency is made equal to the timeframe there will not exist any monitoring during the journey to the desired future. You will have only one verification at the end, and if you fail to meet the objective it is too late to act. For example, in the picture above, before the end of the time frame there are three interim moments of monitoring allowing action if needed.
What is the best timeframe for an objective? It will depend on the dimension of the change needed and on the availability of resources.
The following material will provide you more information:
Following article explains how to create an ISO 9001 process flowchart, and provides an example of a process flowchart that can be used as a guideline for creating a flowchart for your own company. You will also learn:
For more information, please see:
Also, this webinar may provide additional information:
ABC Company is the controller of his own staff's personal data. In the job contract or in the staff privacy notice, the staff gave consent to ABC company to process personal data to carry the task of the job, which means also transfer data to processors or the third parties if related to the job.
The application, therefore, will be a processor that processes ABC’s staff personal data on the behalf of the organization for the scope to fulfill the software license agreement (use the application). Therefore, there will be a data processing agreement between ABC Company and Application Company which regulates how ABC’s data will be processed accordingly Article 28 GDPR requirements.
GDPR applies to the whole organization and all its data processing activities whether they are computer-based or not.
Here you can find more information:
If you want to know more about GDPR compliance you can consider enrolling in this EU GDPR Foundations Course: https://advisera.com/training/eu-gdpr-foundations-course//
Internal auditors receive a kind of order for their audits. That order specifies three critical topics:
You can look for more information below:
Imagine a wooden furniture manufacturing company. Life cycle analysis can begin with a concern for the origin of the wood, the guarantee that the wood came from a legitimate origin with proper exploitation practices. Then, the wood is worked in a way to be used well. And it can reach the point where the company proposes to customers to collect the furniture at the end of its useful life.
Another example may be that of a toy manufacturer that includes information for customers to properly dispose of toy batteries at the end of their useful life.
Please check this information below with more detailed answers:
ISO 14001 is about an environmental management system (EMS). So, risk assessment in ISO 14001 is related with desired or undesired results about the EMS.
In a laboratory you can start by determining environmental aspects and impacts generated by laboratory operation. Then, you can determine if there are any risks and opportunities around those environmental aspects and impacts. For example, I worked in a laboratory that generated hazardous wastes. Risks could be about giving the right treatment for those wastes, working with the authorized waste operators, using practices to minimize waste generation, minimizing wastes mixture.
You can find more information below: