If the documentation that is missing is mandatory to start the audit, or if by making it available during the audit the audit team cannot assure the related processes are being performed as planned, then the internal audit should not be performed. In any other cases the audit team can adjust the audit plan to cover the processes related to the missing document at the end of the audit, giving time for the documentation to be ready to be evaluated.
But you should note that this situation must be informed and recorded either at the audit opening meeting as well as at the audit closing meeting. This way the audit team can make the situation and results clear to all involved.
In case you want to perform this internal audit before the implementation of a standard is done, then it would be better to perform the Gap analysis instead of internal audit. For more information about gap analysis and internal audit, please see this article: Gap analysis vs. internal audit in ISO 9001 https://advisera.com/9001academy/blog/2015/02/17/gap-analysis-vs-internal-audit-iso-9001//
Answer: I don't know the legal requirements of your country to start a company, but in terms of certification you should have at least one dedicated office location (company's headquarters), where the people accountable for the company can be found. This dedicated office can be the home address of the founder / CEO of the company. You can present this address as company's address and all other locations can be considered remote locations and can be audited accordingly.
Cybersecurity and ISO 9001
Answer: Cybersecurity is the protection of computer systems from situations that can prevent them to fulfill their intended objectives, and ISO 9001 is a standard related to quality management, with focus on meeting customer's requirements and ensure their satisfaction.
THe scope of Environmental Management System (EMS) is a simple statement on to what processes, products and services and locations your EMS is applied to. It can be as simple as "EMS of XYZ Company applies to following processes [...], services [...] and locations [...]." THis statement can be documented as a separate document or included in the Environmental Manual or any other document which you see fit.
These materials will also help you regarding EMS scope:
- Free online training ISO 14001:2015 Foundations Course ht tps://advisera.com/training/iso-140012015-foundations-course/
- Conformio (online tool for [write the relevant standard]) https://advisera.com/conformio/ "
Exclusion of ISO 9001 requirements in call centre
Answer:
Clause 8.3 is referring to both product and services, but if the organization doesn't develop new services, it can exclude clause 8.3 from the scope of its QMS (Quality Management System). Property belonging to the customer has nothing to do with the clause 8.3, this clause can be excluded regardless of whether the company is using customer property in its processes or not. Clause 8.5.3 is dealing with requirements regarding customer property and it can also be excluded if the organization does not use such property.
For call centre, you can also consider excluding clause 7.1.5 Monitoring and measuring resources, 8.5.6 Release of products and services and 8.5.5 Post-delivery activities. For any exclusion made, you need to provide and document justification.
Since the standard doesn't have any requirements regarding accounting and finance, the only way of auditing them is against the organization internal procedures regarding accounting and finance. Department of finance and accounting is often left out from the scope of the QMS, simply because it is perceived that these processes do not affect quality of the product and service and customer satisfaction. In the same way they can be left out from the scope of ISO 9001 internal audit.
In order to verify the internal auditors, they need to demonstrate competences for:
- understanding process approach and risk-based thinking
- understanding of customer specific requirements
- understanding of applicable ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 requirements
- understanding of the core tools, and
- understanding of the auditing techniques.
In order to demonstrate this, the auditors should provide some evidence in terms of experience and training they had on these topics. The training can be conducted by the organization itself, or by some external trainers. Basically, the training records can be sufficient to demonstrate competence. Also, all auditors need to be listed in a record about qualified internal auditors.
Challenge here is that the "line managers" are usually not in a position to review information security ... so to fulfil this what would they actually need to prove/review? The standard does say "review IS processing in their area [...] with appropriate security policies, standards and any other security requirements".
Actually this could be read that, let´s say the production manager has to make sure that OHAS, 9001 etc are correctly followed - so the fulfillment of A18.2.2 is rather an issue outside 27k (and would not require a special Risk Assessment for this)
Answer: The main objective of the section A.18.2 is "to ensure that information security is implemented and operated in accordance with the organizational policies and procedures", so I wouldn't agree with your interpretation that "production manager has to make sure that OHAS, 9001 etc are correctly followed" is related to A18.2.2 because this control speaks about information security implementation, not about quality management o r health & safety.
Considering that, to fulfil control A.18.2.2 managers must define how this will be done. The most common approaches are:
- through review of internal audits results
- through results provided by monitoring and measurement tools
- through the evaluation of the results achieved against security objectives and security performance indicators
Additionally, the managers also must define how eventual non conformities identified will be handled.