Answer:
First of all, you'll need communication channel i.e. the way your customer can reach you. Service requests, publicly published form (e.g. on the self-service portal or service desk portal) or through Service Level management/Business Relationship Management processes - these are the common way to do it.
Once you receive customer complaint it's important to have someone to handle it. Equally important - to let the customer know that someone is working on his complaint.
An finally, internally you need to setup the procedure how to approach the complain. That would include, for example:
- whom to report that complaint has been received
- timescale (maybe hard to define general timescale to resolve complains but at least for usual complaints)
- escalation procedure
- roles and responsibilities
- depending on the services you provide - particular steps to resolve the complaint
Functional Quality Objectives for Website development and maintenance
Functional quality objectives should be related to some feature of your product (website) or your service (maintenance). It should be related to the requirements of product or service and criteria to determine whether the product or service meets its requirements.
First of all, I apologize for the late answer. Regarding your question, yes, the 40 hours course is compulsory to take the exam, but there is no experience requirement to take it.
The experience is required only when you want to start working as a certification auditor. In such case you start by participating as an observer, and after some audit hours you will participate more actively in the audit, until the point you will have all responsibilities of a lead auditor.
Risk assessment and business analysis impact
Answer: Risk Assessment and Business Impact Analysis can be performed in any sequence, and ISO 22301 allow both approaches. We recommend performing the risk assessment first because this way you will have a better impression of which incidents can happen, which will make easier to focus on the most impacting ones during the Business Impact Analysis.
Answer: Considering ISO 27001, the control of premises access has the objective to protect the physical access both to information and to information processing facilities. This is achieved by considering, according results of risk assessment, applicable legal requirements, and decisions of top management, the definition of security perimeters, entry controls, and protections of rooms and facilities, among other controls.
Regarding individual responsibilities, you can consider terms of:
- guidelines definition and resources provision (top management)
- operation and management of security controls (e.g., technical staff and security officer)
- Compliance with security controls and policies (employees)
Answer: SOC Continued Operations Letter is an artefact provided by Amazon Web Services a service organization may choose to issue describing updates or changes in its controls since previous audits from certification bodies or regulators, as means to support audit activities. You can find more information at this link: https://aws.amazon.com/artifact/
Certifications to support risk resilience.
Answer: If your focus is the recovery of business activities you should consider the ISO 22301 certification, because it can provide you the bases for identifying the most critical aspects of the business, the most relevant disruptions scenarios and how to handle them properly to minimize impact and speed up recovery.
Additionally, I also suggest you to consider ISO 27001 certification, since you also have to consider the protection of business information, and ISO 27001 is specifically designed to handle information protection.
Answer: Being ISO management standards, ISO 20000 and ISO 27001 have many similarities that become easier to integrate them (and this similarities will become clearer after the release of the new version of ISO 20000, that may be in the next two years - currently the revision is half way across the process - https://www.iso.org/standard/70636.html).
Considering the current standard, I advise you to start with the documenting the common procedures and records (e.g., internal audit and management review), considering the requirements of both standards, and after that go for the specificities of each standard.
Answer:
Change ticket should have final result. That could be that change was e.g. rejected, or implemented. In line with that, if change has failed - keep the next attempt in the same ticket. Next attempt belongs to the same change, anyway.
And, don't forget to use number of failed changes as one of the KPI's of the change management process.
To learn more about measuring efficiency of the change management process, read the article:
"How to measure Change Management efficiency according to ITIL" https://advisera.com/20000academy/blog/2016/10/11/how-to-measure-change-management-efficiency-according-to-itil/