Guest
New to the ISO 27001 space, on my first day with my first client, what discussions do I need to engage in, what do I need to do, what to ask, who to engage etc. to commence 1) an ISO 27001 audit 2) ISO27001 Implementation?
I am going through the documentation and have a question regarding the Information Classification Policy.
More precisely regarding “labeling” of information. I would like to stick as close as possible to the default document.
However, as a B2B communication agency almost all information we manage (and that is a lot) can be classified as “Internal use”.
Is it ok to specify that all “(unlabeled)” or “INTERNAL” labeled information is to be considered “internal use”?
So that we can avoid needing to label just about everything with the same label.
Could can an alternative be to use “(unlabled)” for “internal use” and “public” for “public” assets?
Which and too and approach can I use to make my asset inventory and risk analysis in order to see which control I need to put in place?
1. Regarding EU GDPR & ISO 27001 Integrated Documentation Toolkit:
Does it cover also ISO 27701:2019?
2. Does it cover also GDPR cases where EU customer personal data is processed outside of EU in a country like ***? (like using standard data protection clauses adopted by the EU Commission, etc?)
3. Does there exist an employee contract template which takes into account GDPR?
4. Does there exist a B2B contract template which takes into account GDPR when processing EU customer personal data in a country like ***?
5. Does there exist a B2B contract template which takes into account GDPR when EU customer personal data is processed outside of EU in a country like ***??
Do you have any thoughts on the ISO/IEC 38500?
Would we want to add this after our ISO/IEC 27001 that we are working on?
Also, in regards to the ISO 22301, does this compliment the GDPR that we are working on?
Hello Advisera Team,
a question to this control: A.9.2.5 Review of user access rights.
What we need and what we have now there is that user access rights are reviewed when there is a change in employees status (e.g. department or position is changed).
Is it enough or is periodical review meint here?
Thank you!
Hello Dejan,
In the Appendix 1 in the toolkit I bought you are proposing some assets, I need to ask the whole company (management and so on) to give me a list of all the assets and mark whoever the ones that are more critical for our organization. But on what level should we specify the assets?
For example, the ones you specified:
People
Applications and databases
And so on.
If we take some few real examples from our organization, should we specify detailed such as:
*** (helpdesk software, critical for giving good support to our clients)
*** (billing system for our cloud business)
Or should this be classified as a broader category such as your examples?
Thank you
Agradeceré puedan resolver mi siguiente consulta.
Desde hace algunos meses compré el Paquete Premium de ustedes y he venido haciendo la preparación para que una empresa pueda certificarse en ISO 27001.
Mi pregunta es: Hasta qué punto debo llegar para que la empresa Certificadora haga su auditoría ? Deben considerar que he cumplido todos los pasos exigibles y obligatorios por ISO 27001, habiendo llegado hasta al “Plan de concienciación y capacitación”. Solamente me está faltando los puntos de “Auditoría Interna”, “Revisión por la dirección” y “Acciones correctivas”…. Mi pregunta es, si estos 3 últimos pasos debo realizarlos obligatoriamente antes de pasar la Auditoría de Certificación.
Debo resaltar que, en mi calidad de Consultor de la implementación de ISO 27001, no podría hacer una Auditoría Interna, debido a que no debo ser “juez y parte”.
Que es lo que debo hacer o que me recomiendan ?