Guest
Please I need some professional advice
A holding/group/mother company with other legal subsidiary companies want to implement ISMS for the group with the scope including the subsidiary companies.
The Group company and the subsidiary companies are all located at the same place
The same staff works for both the Group company and subsidiary company
They both share the same assets.
But the subsidiary companies offer different products and services
What do you suggest should be the best way to implement the ISMS towards achieving Certification?
1. What is the expected risk level of the residual risk? Assume acceptance is below 3, should a residual risk level be more than 3 having implemented all controls
2. Clause 6.1.1 requires actions to address opportunities.
a. What are opportunities - in relation to ISMS
b. What are the actions to address opportunities
3. What determines likelihood of occurrence in risk assessment ? Is it the frequency for occurrence of an activity/process?
Context
For our ISMS scope, I have added in an organisation chart. On the basis of your advice stating that 3rd parties are out of our remit of control I have made our CFO (he is an independent consultant) and shareholders out of scope.
Question.
In the section, exclusions from scope, are we okay to exclude the CFO/Finance function and shareholders from the scope?
Do you have an example of a completed Risk Assessment Table I could look at please. I am interested particularly in the numbering system. It seems to me the numbering should run by asset not by vulnerability, so 1.1, 1.2 etc until next asset.
Es factible contar con una lista de documentos secuencial solo para SGCN.
Te comento que actualmente ya contamos con un SGSI implementado e iniciaremos en breve la implementación de nuestro SGCN. Respecto a los documentos, adquirimos el paquete completo para que nos ayude a complementar el SGSI que actualmente tenemos.
I have been tasked to setup the IT Governance, Risk and Security department from zero and was wondering what approach to take to make it easy to adopt as well as practical being practical and allow me to introduce polices, guidelines to mitigate risks as I go along.