Guest
I have a question regarding the SOA and Control Objectives.
I was thinking that I should just include the Control Objectives and Controls in ISO27K
Is this OK or do I need to rephrase the words in case there is a Copywrite issue???
The documentation in the package covers all the 114 controls of the Standard?
The Disaster Recovery Plan (of the toolkit) hasn’t a section talking about the reference documents. Is that wanted (even if there are relevant sections in the standard (A.17.1.2 und A.17.2.1)?
Thanks for the support and information you are giving us. I am now doing the risk assessment and I have a question for you. So we have different Asset owners and let's say they all have laptops. So do I need to put every laptop and its associated risks, threats, and vulnerabilities or I just categorize it as laptops?
Our company has a complex IT-infrastructure and various RTOs. We, therefore, need separate disaster recovery plans. Are there templates when you need to work more differentiated?
What to do with the demands of standard that have long since been overcome. You know what I am thinking.
In which document is my question: "Specification of safety requirements“
In which area: "Impact level according to the risk assessment:“
Question:
In our risk assessment table, we didn’t list each information system, we worked with categories like "application software" or "workstations“. Information systems can occur in both categories. Both categories have multiple threats, vulnerabilities, and therefore impact levels. In this case, how is it possible to determine the impact level of the individual information system in the "Specification of security requirements“ based on the risk assessment table?"