There is not a specific format or standard to use for documenting those requirements.
For the context of the organization you can develop a procedure or just conduct a SWOT analysis with the relevant people of your organization. Doing so, you are demonstrating that you have determined the internal and external issues of your organization, since there is not a mandatory document regarding the context of the organization.
In regards to quality objectives, although there is not a common format to use, they must be SMART, that is specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time-based and also need to have relevance at all levels of the company. Also you should plan how to achieve those quality objectives and record them. You can check this article for more information about quality objectives - How to write good quality objectives: https://advisera.com/9001academy/knowledgebase/how-to-write-good-quality-objectives/
Answer:
Documents relevant to a quality management system (QMS) must be controlled. Controlled documents are approved and reviewed by authorized functions – to avoid documents being issued or changed by anyone.
Changes and current document revision status are identified to avoid unintended use of obsolete versions. Obsolete versions are removed to avoid unintended use.
Controlled documents are available at points of use and are kept legible and readily identifiable.
Documents of external origin considered relevant to the QMS must be controlled: They must be identified, and updated versions kept.
Answer:
You can draw up the context of your organization by using the PESTEL technique (political, economic, social, technological, environmental, legislative) for determining external issues. For example:
New legislation can impact the future of your organization (positively or negatively) - Legislative
Positive or negative economic sentiment can influence demand for your organization’s products - Economic
More and more concern from society with the protection of workers can have an impact in your organization’s activities - Social
New materials and new technologies can be used in the manufacturing of your products – Technological
For determining internal issues:
Both documents and records are included within the so called "documented information" in the standard. Documents are referred in ISO 9001:2015 as documented information that needs to be maintained, while records are referred as documented information that needs to be retained. So you can name it as you want, because any term, documented information or documents and records is correct.
ISO 27001 requires risks to be periodically reviewed, or when situations that may impact the business occur, but it is not mandatory to identify new risks or create new risk treatment plan.
However, it is highly unlikely that risks haven’t changed for so long (this situation will very probably call the attention of the certification auditor).
Some issues you have to consider on risk assessment that may trigger new risks are: new products, new technology, change of the location, change of customer profile, change of employees profile, new compan y strategy, etc.
Answer:
Determining the internal and external context is required by ISO 9001:2015. What is not mandatory is to have it documented. I think about the context of an organization as a way of thinking about the surroundings, the environment where an organization is operating, to avoid “making castles in the air”, to avoid big plans without keeping the feet on the ground. And to promote a reflection about risks and opportunities for the organization based on internal and external issues.
Answer:
First, you must know and formalize your knowledge of ISO 9001:2015.
Second, you must know good auditing practices.
Third, you must have experience doing internal audits.
Fourth, you must have training to be a lead auditor.
Fifth, you should contact a certification body and ask how you can apply to become a Lead Auditor.
2.What suits me better taking the path of consulting or being an auditor?
Answer:
Either path that you take does not invalidate the other. I believe it even enhances the ability of an auditor to have the experience of a consultant and vice versa. So, you can start as a consultant and internal auditor and then become also lead auditor for one or more certification bodies.
Answer
You should start by getting clients and projects to ensure a stream of revenue. To win clients and start building a net of contacts and relationships start a blog, participate in conferences, publish technical papers, work as subcontractor for bigger companies.
Where inside the document: Chapter 3.1 Introduction (first paragraph of the chapter)
What’s my question: The last sentence of the paragraph says: "There should be a procedure for registering users for each system and service.“ It doesn’t sound like a „must“. In that chase the person who is in charge of me says: if it’s not a fact we HAVE to do we won’t do it (and I should delete the passage out of the paragraph). On the other hand this sentence expresses control A.9.2.1 which we definitely need to fulfill. What would the implementation of this sentence look like in general?
Answer:
The fact that this paragraph says "should" and not "must" is because if an organization has too much systems in the ISMS scope, implementing procedures for all of them would be unpractical.
For arguments like the one you suggested, you can perform a risk analysis for specific systems to evaluate the risk of not having a registering procedure for that system. You can either change text of the Access control policy for something like this: "Procedure for registering users for each system and service must be considered based on risks related to each system and service."