Answer: ISO 22301 does not define minimum requirements for education, only that personnel involved with business continuity management has the proper competencies to fulfill their duties, which can be evidenced in terms not only of education, but also in terms of skills and experience.
Considering that, among common competences for Business Continuity Manager we can mention:
- Business Impact Analysis
- Risk Management
- Project management
- Business continuity frameworks (e.g., ISO 22301 standard, BCI Good Practice Guidelines, etc.)
- BCMS audit
- Communication
Some competencies can be found in the following courses:
- ISO 22301 lead implementer course
- ISO 22301 lead auditor course
This article will provide you further explanation about Competences for Business Continuity Manager:
- The challenging role of the ISO 22301 BCM Manager htt ps://advisera.com/27001academy/blog/2016/03/21/the-challenging-role-of-the-iso-22301-bcm-manager/
The life cycle perspective should be applied during the identification of environmental aspects. For every environmental aspects one should consider what happens before and after our organization. For example, in the case of your industry and for the case of ready-mix concrete that you mention, does your suppliers use legal raw-materials? In my country it was common to illegally grab sand without any environmental considerations, does the cement used is produced by a company that respects environmental laws and regulations?
More exampl es:
during construction land is removed - what is its destination?
during renovation, construction-demolition residues are generated – what is its destination?
The following material will provide you information about applying life cycle perspective:
Key performance indicator is not a terminology used by ISO 9001:2015, although very common. Clause 4.4.1 c) mentions performance indicators, indicators to monitor and measure process performance. According to the strategic orientation of an organization, some processes will be more critical than others for organizational success or competitiveness. Performance indicators of those processes will be key performance indicators. For example, for an organization that bets on its ability to innovate, indicators about the performance of the innovation process will be key performance indicators.
The following material will provide you information about key performance indicators:
Answer:
Consent is one of the most widely used for marketing. Under certain circumstances legitimate interest may work as well.
However, If you intend to process personal data for the purposes of direct marketing by electronic means (by email, text, automated calls etc) legitimate interests may not always be an appropriate basis for processing. This is because the e-privacy laws on electronic marketing – currently the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) – require that individuals give their consent to some forms of electronic marketing.
• [relevant national law or regulation for GDPR implementation ]
• [other local laws and regulations]
Answer:
We don`t know each end every national law regarding privacy in the EU. This is why we left the field blank. This is something la corporate counsel or local lawyer can help you with.
Risk assessment process
Answer: You have to evaluate likelihood at the planning level, because at this point it will help you decide which risk treatment option is more appropriated and it will be less costly to make changes if you identify need for changes. After the implementation level the likelihood evaluation is used to confirm the expected likelihood you identified during the planning phase and to make proper adjustments.
2. At what level do evaluate the residual risk?
Answer: The first evaluation is made during the planning phase, after the definition of the risk treatment option. This is a kind of an expected residual risk.
After the implementation phase, during the controls performance review, you use real data to evaluate the residual risk to confirm your assumption during the planning phase and to make proper adjustments
Answer:
For example, a matrix that relates “Effort” and “Consequences”.
With “Effort” we measure the degree of effort needed to exploit an opportunity. With “Consequences” we measure the degree of return that can give an improvement in productivity, sales or quality performance.
We look for opportunities that with a low effort give a high return, for example.
The following material will provide you information about opportunities classification:
First, what does your organization considers organizational knowledge?
I like to think about organizational knowledge as:
1) what the organization knows it knows
2) what the organization does not know that it knows
This can be handled by human resources and is about training, coaching by experienced workers, and experience.
If an auditor, ask for evidences of this type I would show training and coaching records for new employees or employees that changed roles.
3) what the organization knows it does not know
This can be handled with the help of external training, suppliers, books and technical magazines, for example and can be performed by several internal functions.
If an auditor, ask for evidences of this type I would show evidences of learning occurred due to study, external training, reports from suppliers, reports from investigation, reports from improvement projects.
4) what the organization does not know that it does not know
This can be handled by different internal functions that maintain a kind of radar surveying relevant potential new knowledge with the help of books, magazines, blogs, conferences, networking, suppliers, …
I would show evidence of any case that could demonstrate this last case. For example, some years ago, I was working in a process engineering team in the chemical industry. One afternoon, one of my colleagues, reading a technical magazine, started to comment about a new kind of material for storage silos. Rapidly, we in the room started a kind of brainstorm about benefits and drawbacks. After that, my colleague contacted the manufacturer, requested technical information and presented it to our board of directors. After some calculations, it was easy to conclude that the new material had a lot of advantages. We used it in the next plant expansion.
The following material will provide you information about internal audits:
Answer:
The question is much to broad to be able to provide you with an exact answer. However, given the sector in which you are activating I think that one of your first priorities would be: