Start a new topic and get direct answers from the Expert Advice Community.
CREATE NEW TOPIC +Guest
In this case you will be focussing on internal issues, personal relationships, or other conflicts of interest between operations and quality activities. Ion these situations, impartiality can be safeguarded by establishing clear measurable quality objectives and a commitment as operations manager that decisions will not be taken which could impact the quality objectives. Use independent internal auditors to ensure fair unbiased decisions are evident. For example not taking on more work that the laboratory can cope with, nor putting unfair pressure on laboratory personnel to rush results by taking shortcuts. Any identified risks must be addressed and resolved.
For more information, have a look at the advice answers
Compliance with the ISO/IEC 17025:2017 requirement for Impartiality - https://community.advisera.com/topic/compliance-with-the-isoiec-170252017-requirement-for-impartiality/
Procedure for impartiality - https://community.advisera.com/topic/procedure-for-impartiality/
The ISO 17025 document template: Registry of Key Risks and Opportunities, is available for purchase -https://advisera.com/17025academy/documentation/registry-of-key-risks-and-opportunities/
No, it is not mandatory to have a flowchart in a procedure. It is up to each organization to decide the composition of a procedure.
As an internal QC laboratory, you need to consider the needs of production, as your “client” when you review the client requests. Reporting can be simplified, as agreed. This is as long as the internal user has accurate, valid information to make a decision on.
Regarding the quality policy for an ISO 17025 laboratory, it needs to specifically address safeguarding impartiality, competency and consistent valid results.
For impartiality look at risks due to shared resources, reporting structures where QC personnel may report to the production manager and possible undue pressure on the QC lab to speed up release of results. Look at the article How to ensure impartiality in an ISO 17025 laboratory at https://advisera.com/17025academy/blog/2020/10/12/ensuring-impartiality-in-an-iso-17025-laboratory/
ISO 27001 does not prescribe retention times for records.
To identify the required retention time, you need to consider the results of the risk assessment and applicable legal requirements (e.g., laws, regulations, and contracts).
In case there are no relevant risks or legal requirements defining for how long to keep records such as CCTV images, the organization can adopt the retention time that best fulfills its needs.
For further information see:
I'm assuming that by "cloud adoption lifecycle" you mean a sequence of steps followed to implement cloud computing capabilities.
Considering that, please note that this toolkit includes all you need to perform the cloud security risk assessment and to plan for cloud security controls. You have to follow the steps in the toolkit and use the templates to achieve this.
In case you need further support to implement the documents, you can schedule a call with an expert to have a one-on-one live consultation.
This article will provide you with further explanation about ISO 27001 information risk assessment:
The general approach to performing an audit is:
Considering a cloud environment, you need to clarify the responsibilities for each asset, so you can properly identify who needs to be audited about which asset.
For example, in an IaaS cloud model, the cloud provider is responsible only for the physical structure, while in a PaaS model, the cloud provider is also responsible for the development environment used by application developers, and in a SaaS environment, the cloud provider is also responsible for the applications.
These articles will provide you a further explanation about preparing an audit:
I do not have enough information to respond to the question of how long it would take to calibrate a tester.
For more information on associated calibration intervals, refer to ILAC G24:2007 Guidelines for the determination of calibration intervals of measuring instruments (note currently under revision) available for download at https://ilac.org/?ddownload=818
For more information, have a look at
The article: What does ISO 17025:2017 require for laboratory measurement equipment and related procedures? at https://advisera.com/17025academy/blog/2019/07/25/iso-17025-measurement-requirements-of-the-standard/
ITIL considers the whole life cycle of the service as well as the whole (IT Service Management) organization.
Here are a few articles that can give you an idea of why consider (and implement) ITIL i.e. what are some of the positive outcomes of the ITIL implementation:
It all depends on the role of the subsidiaries, whether they are data controllers or data processors. If they are data processors, it is the role of the data controller to make sure that data subjects are informed by means of a privacy notice. If they are data controllers, they need to make sure that they have a privacy notice describing their processing operations. What is really important is to make sure that the data subject is informed. The privacy notice or notices can reside in a single location, however, they must be easy to read and understand, and contain information about all the processing operations.
Please visit these resources as well: